time: Fix spelling mistakes in new comments

Fixup spelling issues caught by Richard

CC: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
CC: Chen Jie <chenj@lemote.com>
CC: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
This commit is contained in:
John Stultz 2011-10-27 17:41:17 -07:00
parent c9fad429d4
commit 3f86f28ffc
1 changed files with 4 additions and 4 deletions

View File

@ -809,11 +809,11 @@ static void timekeeping_adjust(s64 offset)
* First we shift it down from NTP_SHIFT to clocksource->shifted nsecs.
*
* Note we subtract one in the shift, so that error is really error*2.
* This "saves" dividing(shifting) intererval twice, but keeps the
* (error > interval) comparision as still measuring if error is
* This "saves" dividing(shifting) interval twice, but keeps the
* (error > interval) comparison as still measuring if error is
* larger then half an interval.
*
* Note: It does not "save" on aggrivation when reading the code.
* Note: It does not "save" on aggravation when reading the code.
*/
error = timekeeper.ntp_error >> (timekeeper.ntp_error_shift - 1);
if (error > interval) {
@ -829,7 +829,7 @@ static void timekeeping_adjust(s64 offset)
* nanosecond, and store the amount rounded up into
* the error. This causes the likely below to be unlikely.
*
* The properfix is to avoid rounding up by using
* The proper fix is to avoid rounding up by using
* the high precision timekeeper.xtime_nsec instead of
* xtime.tv_nsec everywhere. Fixing this will take some
* time.