apparmor: make signal label match work when matching stacked labels
Given a label with a profile stack of A//&B or A//&C ... A ptrace rule should be able to specify a generic trace pattern with a rule like signal send A//&**, however this is failing because while the correct label match routine is called, it is being done post label decomposition so it is always being done against a profile instead of the stacked label. To fix this refactor the cross check to pass the full peer label in to the label_match. Signed-off-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
1d6583d9c6
commit
3dc6b1ce68
|
@ -184,50 +184,34 @@ static void audit_signal_cb(struct audit_buffer *ab, void *va)
|
|||
FLAGS_NONE, GFP_ATOMIC);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* TODO: update to handle compound name&name2, conditionals */
|
||||
static void profile_match_signal(struct aa_profile *profile, const char *label,
|
||||
int signal, struct aa_perms *perms)
|
||||
{
|
||||
unsigned int state;
|
||||
|
||||
/* TODO: secondary cache check <profile, profile, perm> */
|
||||
state = aa_dfa_next(profile->policy.dfa,
|
||||
profile->policy.start[AA_CLASS_SIGNAL],
|
||||
signal);
|
||||
state = aa_dfa_match(profile->policy.dfa, state, label);
|
||||
aa_compute_perms(profile->policy.dfa, state, perms);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int profile_signal_perm(struct aa_profile *profile,
|
||||
struct aa_profile *peer, u32 request,
|
||||
struct aa_label *peer, u32 request,
|
||||
struct common_audit_data *sa)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct aa_perms perms;
|
||||
unsigned int state;
|
||||
|
||||
if (profile_unconfined(profile) ||
|
||||
!PROFILE_MEDIATES(profile, AA_CLASS_SIGNAL))
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
aad(sa)->peer = &peer->label;
|
||||
profile_match_signal(profile, peer->base.hname, aad(sa)->signal,
|
||||
&perms);
|
||||
aad(sa)->peer = peer;
|
||||
/* TODO: secondary cache check <profile, profile, perm> */
|
||||
state = aa_dfa_next(profile->policy.dfa,
|
||||
profile->policy.start[AA_CLASS_SIGNAL],
|
||||
aad(sa)->signal);
|
||||
aa_label_match(profile, peer, state, false, request, &perms);
|
||||
aa_apply_modes_to_perms(profile, &perms);
|
||||
return aa_check_perms(profile, &perms, request, sa, audit_signal_cb);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int aa_signal_cross_perm(struct aa_profile *sender,
|
||||
struct aa_profile *target,
|
||||
struct common_audit_data *sa)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return xcheck(profile_signal_perm(sender, target, MAY_WRITE, sa),
|
||||
profile_signal_perm(target, sender, MAY_READ, sa));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
int aa_may_signal(struct aa_label *sender, struct aa_label *target, int sig)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct aa_profile *profile;
|
||||
DEFINE_AUDIT_DATA(sa, LSM_AUDIT_DATA_NONE, OP_SIGNAL);
|
||||
|
||||
aad(&sa)->signal = map_signal_num(sig);
|
||||
return xcheck_labels_profiles(sender, target, aa_signal_cross_perm,
|
||||
&sa);
|
||||
return xcheck_labels(sender, target, profile,
|
||||
profile_signal_perm(profile, target, MAY_WRITE, &sa),
|
||||
profile_signal_perm(profile, sender, MAY_READ, &sa));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue