ASoC: cht_bsw_rt5645: Use snd_pcm_hw_constraint_single()
Use the new snd_pcm_hw_constraint_single() helper function rather than installing a list constraint with a single value. Since snd_pcm_hw_constraint_single() sets a static constraint while snd_pcm_hw_constraint_list() sets a dynamic constraint the former is slightly more efficient and it also needs less code. Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de> Acked-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com> Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
This commit is contained in:
parent
a6553a24d4
commit
3d6a76c48e
|
@ -235,20 +235,10 @@ static int cht_codec_fixup(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd,
|
|||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static unsigned int rates_48000[] = {
|
||||
48000,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
static struct snd_pcm_hw_constraint_list constraints_48000 = {
|
||||
.count = ARRAY_SIZE(rates_48000),
|
||||
.list = rates_48000,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
static int cht_aif1_startup(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return snd_pcm_hw_constraint_list(substream->runtime, 0,
|
||||
SNDRV_PCM_HW_PARAM_RATE,
|
||||
&constraints_48000);
|
||||
return snd_pcm_hw_constraint_single(substream->runtime,
|
||||
SNDRV_PCM_HW_PARAM_RATE, 48000);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static struct snd_soc_ops cht_aif1_ops = {
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue