Input: pwm-vibra - prevent unbalanced regulator
pwm_vibrator_stop disables the regulator, but it can be called from multiple places, even when the regulator is already disabled. Fix this by using regulator_is_enabled check when starting and stopping device. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Bakker <xc-racer2@live.ca> Signed-off-by: Paweł Chmiel <pawel.mikolaj.chmiel@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
4d741f3dd1
commit
3ca232df99
|
@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ struct pwm_vibrator {
|
|||
struct work_struct play_work;
|
||||
u16 level;
|
||||
u32 direction_duty_cycle;
|
||||
bool vcc_on;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
static int pwm_vibrator_start(struct pwm_vibrator *vibrator)
|
||||
|
@ -42,10 +43,13 @@ static int pwm_vibrator_start(struct pwm_vibrator *vibrator)
|
|||
struct pwm_state state;
|
||||
int err;
|
||||
|
||||
err = regulator_enable(vibrator->vcc);
|
||||
if (err) {
|
||||
dev_err(pdev, "failed to enable regulator: %d", err);
|
||||
return err;
|
||||
if (!vibrator->vcc_on) {
|
||||
err = regulator_enable(vibrator->vcc);
|
||||
if (err) {
|
||||
dev_err(pdev, "failed to enable regulator: %d", err);
|
||||
return err;
|
||||
}
|
||||
vibrator->vcc_on = true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pwm_get_state(vibrator->pwm, &state);
|
||||
|
@ -76,7 +80,10 @@ static int pwm_vibrator_start(struct pwm_vibrator *vibrator)
|
|||
|
||||
static void pwm_vibrator_stop(struct pwm_vibrator *vibrator)
|
||||
{
|
||||
regulator_disable(vibrator->vcc);
|
||||
if (vibrator->vcc_on) {
|
||||
regulator_disable(vibrator->vcc);
|
||||
vibrator->vcc_on = false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (vibrator->pwm_dir)
|
||||
pwm_disable(vibrator->pwm_dir);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue