svcrdma: Select NFSv4.1 backchannel transport based on forward channel
The current code always selects XPRT_TRANSPORT_BC_TCP for the back channel, even when the forward channel was not TCP (eg, RDMA). When a 4.1 mount is attempted with RDMA, the server panics in the TCP BC code when trying to send CB_NULL. Instead, construct the transport protocol number from the forward channel transport or'd with XPRT_TRANSPORT_BC. Transports that do not support bi-directional RPC will not have registered a "BC" transport, causing create_backchannel_client() to fail immediately. Fixes: https://bugzilla.linux-nfs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=265 Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
5d6031ca74
commit
3c45ddf823
|
@ -689,7 +689,8 @@ static int setup_callback_client(struct nfs4_client *clp, struct nfs4_cb_conn *c
|
||||||
clp->cl_cb_session = ses;
|
clp->cl_cb_session = ses;
|
||||||
args.bc_xprt = conn->cb_xprt;
|
args.bc_xprt = conn->cb_xprt;
|
||||||
args.prognumber = clp->cl_cb_session->se_cb_prog;
|
args.prognumber = clp->cl_cb_session->se_cb_prog;
|
||||||
args.protocol = XPRT_TRANSPORT_BC_TCP;
|
args.protocol = conn->cb_xprt->xpt_class->xcl_ident |
|
||||||
|
XPRT_TRANSPORT_BC;
|
||||||
args.authflavor = ses->se_cb_sec.flavor;
|
args.authflavor = ses->se_cb_sec.flavor;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
/* Create RPC client */
|
/* Create RPC client */
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ struct svc_xprt_class {
|
||||||
struct svc_xprt_ops *xcl_ops;
|
struct svc_xprt_ops *xcl_ops;
|
||||||
struct list_head xcl_list;
|
struct list_head xcl_list;
|
||||||
u32 xcl_max_payload;
|
u32 xcl_max_payload;
|
||||||
|
int xcl_ident;
|
||||||
};
|
};
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/*
|
/*
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -692,6 +692,7 @@ static struct svc_xprt_class svc_udp_class = {
|
||||||
.xcl_owner = THIS_MODULE,
|
.xcl_owner = THIS_MODULE,
|
||||||
.xcl_ops = &svc_udp_ops,
|
.xcl_ops = &svc_udp_ops,
|
||||||
.xcl_max_payload = RPCSVC_MAXPAYLOAD_UDP,
|
.xcl_max_payload = RPCSVC_MAXPAYLOAD_UDP,
|
||||||
|
.xcl_ident = XPRT_TRANSPORT_UDP,
|
||||||
};
|
};
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
static void svc_udp_init(struct svc_sock *svsk, struct svc_serv *serv)
|
static void svc_udp_init(struct svc_sock *svsk, struct svc_serv *serv)
|
||||||
|
@ -1292,6 +1293,7 @@ static struct svc_xprt_class svc_tcp_class = {
|
||||||
.xcl_owner = THIS_MODULE,
|
.xcl_owner = THIS_MODULE,
|
||||||
.xcl_ops = &svc_tcp_ops,
|
.xcl_ops = &svc_tcp_ops,
|
||||||
.xcl_max_payload = RPCSVC_MAXPAYLOAD_TCP,
|
.xcl_max_payload = RPCSVC_MAXPAYLOAD_TCP,
|
||||||
|
.xcl_ident = XPRT_TRANSPORT_TCP,
|
||||||
};
|
};
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
void svc_init_xprt_sock(void)
|
void svc_init_xprt_sock(void)
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -1306,7 +1306,7 @@ struct rpc_xprt *xprt_create_transport(struct xprt_create *args)
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
spin_unlock(&xprt_list_lock);
|
spin_unlock(&xprt_list_lock);
|
||||||
printk(KERN_ERR "RPC: transport (%d) not supported\n", args->ident);
|
dprintk("RPC: transport (%d) not supported\n", args->ident);
|
||||||
return ERR_PTR(-EIO);
|
return ERR_PTR(-EIO);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
found:
|
found:
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -92,6 +92,7 @@ struct svc_xprt_class svc_rdma_class = {
|
||||||
.xcl_owner = THIS_MODULE,
|
.xcl_owner = THIS_MODULE,
|
||||||
.xcl_ops = &svc_rdma_ops,
|
.xcl_ops = &svc_rdma_ops,
|
||||||
.xcl_max_payload = RPCSVC_MAXPAYLOAD_TCP,
|
.xcl_max_payload = RPCSVC_MAXPAYLOAD_TCP,
|
||||||
|
.xcl_ident = XPRT_TRANSPORT_RDMA,
|
||||||
};
|
};
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
struct svc_rdma_op_ctxt *svc_rdma_get_context(struct svcxprt_rdma *xprt)
|
struct svc_rdma_op_ctxt *svc_rdma_get_context(struct svcxprt_rdma *xprt)
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue