drm/nouveau/gem: use bo.offset rather than mm_node.start
Won't necessarily be a drm_mm_node in the future, and I can't think of any good reason to not use the offset from the bo struct. There may have been some reason once apon a time, but, separate commit just in case. Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
d6ba6d215a
commit
3a92d37e40
|
@ -733,10 +733,8 @@ nouveau_gem_ioctl_pushbuf(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
|
|||
for (i = 0; i < req->nr_push; i++) {
|
||||
struct nouveau_bo *nvbo = (void *)(unsigned long)
|
||||
bo[push[i].bo_index].user_priv;
|
||||
struct drm_mm_node *mem = nvbo->bo.mem.mm_node;
|
||||
|
||||
OUT_RING(chan, ((mem->start << PAGE_SHIFT) +
|
||||
push[i].offset) | 2);
|
||||
OUT_RING(chan, (nvbo->bo.offset + push[i].offset) | 2);
|
||||
OUT_RING(chan, 0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
|
@ -749,7 +747,6 @@ nouveau_gem_ioctl_pushbuf(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
|
|||
for (i = 0; i < req->nr_push; i++) {
|
||||
struct nouveau_bo *nvbo = (void *)(unsigned long)
|
||||
bo[push[i].bo_index].user_priv;
|
||||
struct drm_mm_node *mem = nvbo->bo.mem.mm_node;
|
||||
uint32_t cmd;
|
||||
|
||||
cmd = chan->pushbuf_base + ((chan->dma.cur + 2) << 2);
|
||||
|
@ -771,8 +768,8 @@ nouveau_gem_ioctl_pushbuf(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
|
|||
push[i].length - 8) / 4, cmd);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
OUT_RING(chan, ((mem->start << PAGE_SHIFT) +
|
||||
push[i].offset) | 0x20000000);
|
||||
OUT_RING(chan, 0x20000000 |
|
||||
(nvbo->bo.offset + push[i].offset));
|
||||
OUT_RING(chan, 0);
|
||||
for (j = 0; j < NOUVEAU_DMA_SKIPS; j++)
|
||||
OUT_RING(chan, 0);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue