ima: remove unnecessary extra variable

'function' variable value can be changed instead of
allocating extra '_func' variable.

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Kasatkin <d.kasatkin@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
This commit is contained in:
Dmitry Kasatkin 2014-09-03 10:19:57 +03:00 committed by Mimi Zohar
parent f68c05f4d2
commit 3a8a2eadc4
1 changed files with 5 additions and 4 deletions

View File

@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ static int process_measurement(struct file *file, const char *filename,
struct ima_template_desc *template_desc;
char *pathbuf = NULL;
const char *pathname = NULL;
int rc = -ENOMEM, action, must_appraise, _func;
int rc = -ENOMEM, action, must_appraise;
struct evm_ima_xattr_data *xattr_value = NULL, **xattr_ptr = NULL;
int xattr_len = 0;
@ -182,7 +182,8 @@ static int process_measurement(struct file *file, const char *filename,
must_appraise = action & IMA_APPRAISE;
/* Is the appraise rule hook specific? */
_func = (action & IMA_FILE_APPRAISE) ? FILE_CHECK : function;
if (action & IMA_FILE_APPRAISE)
function = FILE_CHECK;
mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex);
@ -201,7 +202,7 @@ static int process_measurement(struct file *file, const char *filename,
/* Nothing to do, just return existing appraised status */
if (!action) {
if (must_appraise)
rc = ima_get_cache_status(iint, _func);
rc = ima_get_cache_status(iint, function);
goto out_digsig;
}
@ -223,7 +224,7 @@ static int process_measurement(struct file *file, const char *filename,
ima_store_measurement(iint, file, pathname,
xattr_value, xattr_len);
if (action & IMA_APPRAISE_SUBMASK)
rc = ima_appraise_measurement(_func, iint, file, pathname,
rc = ima_appraise_measurement(function, iint, file, pathname,
xattr_value, xattr_len, opened);
if (action & IMA_AUDIT)
ima_audit_measurement(iint, pathname);