vlan: slight optimization for vlan_do_receive()
According Joe's suggestion, maybe it'd be faster to add an unlikely to the test for PCKET_OTHERHOST, so I add it and see whether the performance could be better, although the differences is so small and negligible, but it is hard to catch that any lower device would set the skb type to PACKET_OTHERHOST, so most of time, I think it make sense to add unlikely for the test. Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> Cc: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
2d8d40afd1
commit
375f67df28
|
@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ bool vlan_do_receive(struct sk_buff **skbp)
|
||||||
return false;
|
return false;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
skb->dev = vlan_dev;
|
skb->dev = vlan_dev;
|
||||||
if (skb->pkt_type == PACKET_OTHERHOST) {
|
if (unlikely(skb->pkt_type == PACKET_OTHERHOST)) {
|
||||||
/* Our lower layer thinks this is not local, let's make sure.
|
/* Our lower layer thinks this is not local, let's make sure.
|
||||||
* This allows the VLAN to have a different MAC than the
|
* This allows the VLAN to have a different MAC than the
|
||||||
* underlying device, and still route correctly. */
|
* underlying device, and still route correctly. */
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue