libata: be less verbose about hpa
There's no reason to print out hpa related messages when HPA is not active. Kill the unconditional message and add a warning message which is printed if HPA size is smaller than the current size. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
8af500bc7f
commit
37301a559d
|
@ -983,11 +983,6 @@ static u64 ata_hpa_resize(struct ata_device *dev)
|
|||
else
|
||||
hpa_sectors = ata_read_native_max_address(dev);
|
||||
|
||||
/* if no hpa, both should be equal */
|
||||
ata_dev_printk(dev, KERN_INFO, "%s 1: sectors = %lld, "
|
||||
"hpa_sectors = %lld\n",
|
||||
__FUNCTION__, (long long)sectors, (long long)hpa_sectors);
|
||||
|
||||
if (hpa_sectors > sectors) {
|
||||
ata_dev_printk(dev, KERN_INFO,
|
||||
"Host Protected Area detected:\n"
|
||||
|
@ -1009,7 +1004,11 @@ static u64 ata_hpa_resize(struct ata_device *dev)
|
|||
return hpa_sectors;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else if (hpa_sectors < sectors)
|
||||
ata_dev_printk(dev, KERN_WARNING, "%s 1: hpa sectors (%lld) "
|
||||
"is smaller than sectors (%lld)\n", __FUNCTION__,
|
||||
(long long)hpa_sectors, (long long)sectors);
|
||||
|
||||
return sectors;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue