libata: be less verbose about hpa

There's no reason to print out hpa related messages when HPA is not
active.  Kill the unconditional message and add a warning message
which is printed if HPA size is smaller than the current size.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
This commit is contained in:
Tejun Heo 2007-06-25 20:45:54 +09:00 committed by Jeff Garzik
parent 8af500bc7f
commit 37301a559d
1 changed files with 5 additions and 6 deletions

View File

@ -983,11 +983,6 @@ static u64 ata_hpa_resize(struct ata_device *dev)
else
hpa_sectors = ata_read_native_max_address(dev);
/* if no hpa, both should be equal */
ata_dev_printk(dev, KERN_INFO, "%s 1: sectors = %lld, "
"hpa_sectors = %lld\n",
__FUNCTION__, (long long)sectors, (long long)hpa_sectors);
if (hpa_sectors > sectors) {
ata_dev_printk(dev, KERN_INFO,
"Host Protected Area detected:\n"
@ -1009,7 +1004,11 @@ static u64 ata_hpa_resize(struct ata_device *dev)
return hpa_sectors;
}
}
}
} else if (hpa_sectors < sectors)
ata_dev_printk(dev, KERN_WARNING, "%s 1: hpa sectors (%lld) "
"is smaller than sectors (%lld)\n", __FUNCTION__,
(long long)hpa_sectors, (long long)sectors);
return sectors;
}