x86: remove __range_not_ok()
The __range_not_ok() helper is an x86 (and sparc64) specific interface that does roughly the same thing as __access_ok(), but with different calling conventions. Change this to use the normal interface in order for consistency as we clean up all access_ok() implementations. This changes the limit from TASK_SIZE to TASK_SIZE_MAX, which Al points out is the right thing do do here anyway. The callers have to use __access_ok() instead of the normal access_ok() though, because on x86 that contains a WARN_ON_IN_IRQ() check that cannot be used inside of NMI context while tracing. The check in copy_code() is not needed any more, because this one is already done by copy_from_user_nmi(). Suggested-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/YgsUKcXGR7r4nINj@zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk/ Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
This commit is contained in:
parent
8afafbc955
commit
36903abedf
|
@ -2794,7 +2794,7 @@ perf_callchain_kernel(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry, struct pt_regs *re
|
|||
static inline int
|
||||
valid_user_frame(const void __user *fp, unsigned long size)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return (__range_not_ok(fp, size, TASK_SIZE) == 0);
|
||||
return __access_ok(fp, size);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static unsigned long get_segment_base(unsigned int segment)
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -16,8 +16,10 @@
|
|||
* Test whether a block of memory is a valid user space address.
|
||||
* Returns 0 if the range is valid, nonzero otherwise.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static inline bool __chk_range_not_ok(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size, unsigned long limit)
|
||||
static inline bool __chk_range_not_ok(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size)
|
||||
{
|
||||
unsigned long limit = TASK_SIZE_MAX;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If we have used "sizeof()" for the size,
|
||||
* we know it won't overflow the limit (but
|
||||
|
@ -35,10 +37,10 @@ static inline bool __chk_range_not_ok(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size, un
|
|||
return unlikely(addr > limit);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#define __range_not_ok(addr, size, limit) \
|
||||
#define __access_ok(addr, size) \
|
||||
({ \
|
||||
__chk_user_ptr(addr); \
|
||||
__chk_range_not_ok((unsigned long __force)(addr), size, limit); \
|
||||
!__chk_range_not_ok((unsigned long __force)(addr), size); \
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP
|
||||
|
@ -69,7 +71,7 @@ static inline bool pagefault_disabled(void);
|
|||
#define access_ok(addr, size) \
|
||||
({ \
|
||||
WARN_ON_IN_IRQ(); \
|
||||
likely(!__range_not_ok(addr, size, TASK_SIZE_MAX)); \
|
||||
likely(__access_ok(addr, size)); \
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
extern int __get_user_1(void);
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -81,12 +81,6 @@ static int copy_code(struct pt_regs *regs, u8 *buf, unsigned long src,
|
|||
/* The user space code from other tasks cannot be accessed. */
|
||||
if (regs != task_pt_regs(current))
|
||||
return -EPERM;
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Make sure userspace isn't trying to trick us into dumping kernel
|
||||
* memory by pointing the userspace instruction pointer at it.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (__chk_range_not_ok(src, nbytes, TASK_SIZE_MAX))
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Even if named copy_from_user_nmi() this can be invoked from
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ copy_stack_frame(const struct stack_frame_user __user *fp,
|
|||
{
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
|
||||
if (__range_not_ok(fp, sizeof(*frame), TASK_SIZE))
|
||||
if (!__access_ok(fp, sizeof(*frame)))
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
ret = 1;
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ copy_from_user_nmi(void *to, const void __user *from, unsigned long n)
|
|||
{
|
||||
unsigned long ret;
|
||||
|
||||
if (__range_not_ok(from, n, TASK_SIZE))
|
||||
if (!__access_ok(from, n))
|
||||
return n;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!nmi_uaccess_okay())
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue