btrfs: send: fix crash when memory allocations trigger reclaim
When doing a send we don't expect the task to ever start a transaction after the initial check that verifies if commit roots match the regular roots. This is because after that we set current->journal_info with a stub (special value) that signals we are in send context, so that we take a read lock on an extent buffer when reading it from disk and verifying it is valid (its generation matches the generation stored in the parent). This stub was introduced in 2014 by commita26e8c9f75("Btrfs: don't clear uptodate if the eb is under IO") in order to fix a concurrency issue between send and balance. However there is one particular exception where we end up needing to start a transaction and when this happens it results in a crash with a stack trace like the following: [60015.902283] kernel: WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 58159 at arch/x86/include/asm/kfence.h:44 kfence_protect_page+0x21/0x80 [60015.902292] kernel: Modules linked in: uinput rfcomm snd_seq_dummy (...) [60015.902384] kernel: CPU: 3 PID: 58159 Comm: btrfs Not tainted 5.12.9-300.fc34.x86_64 #1 [60015.902387] kernel: Hardware name: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. To be filled by O.E.M./F2A88XN-WIFI, BIOS F6 12/24/2015 [60015.902389] kernel: RIP: 0010:kfence_protect_page+0x21/0x80 [60015.902393] kernel: Code: ff 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 55 48 89 fd (...) [60015.902396] kernel: RSP: 0018:ffff9fb583453220 EFLAGS: 00010246 [60015.902399] kernel: RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffff9fb583453224 [60015.902401] kernel: RDX: ffff9fb583453224 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000 [60015.902402] kernel: RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 [60015.902404] kernel: R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000002 [60015.902406] kernel: R13: ffff9fb583453348 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000001 [60015.902408] kernel: FS: 00007f158e62d8c0(0000) GS:ffff93bd37580000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [60015.902410] kernel: CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [60015.902412] kernel: CR2: 0000000000000039 CR3: 00000001256d2000 CR4: 00000000000506e0 [60015.902414] kernel: Call Trace: [60015.902419] kernel: kfence_unprotect+0x13/0x30 [60015.902423] kernel: page_fault_oops+0x89/0x270 [60015.902427] kernel: ? search_module_extables+0xf/0x40 [60015.902431] kernel: ? search_bpf_extables+0x57/0x70 [60015.902435] kernel: kernelmode_fixup_or_oops+0xd6/0xf0 [60015.902437] kernel: __bad_area_nosemaphore+0x142/0x180 [60015.902440] kernel: exc_page_fault+0x67/0x150 [60015.902445] kernel: asm_exc_page_fault+0x1e/0x30 [60015.902450] kernel: RIP: 0010:start_transaction+0x71/0x580 [60015.902454] kernel: Code: d3 0f 84 92 00 00 00 80 e7 06 0f 85 63 (...) [60015.902456] kernel: RSP: 0018:ffff9fb5834533f8 EFLAGS: 00010246 [60015.902458] kernel: RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: 0000000000000000 [60015.902460] kernel: RDX: 0000000000000801 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000039 [60015.902462] kernel: RBP: ffff93bc0a7eb800 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000 [60015.902463] kernel: R10: 0000000000098a00 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: 0000000000000001 [60015.902464] kernel: R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff93bc0c92b000 R15: ffff93bc0c92b000 [60015.902468] kernel: btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_inode+0x5d/0x120 [60015.902473] kernel: btrfs_evict_inode+0x2c5/0x3f0 [60015.902476] kernel: evict+0xd1/0x180 [60015.902480] kernel: inode_lru_isolate+0xe7/0x180 [60015.902483] kernel: __list_lru_walk_one+0x77/0x150 [60015.902487] kernel: ? iput+0x1a0/0x1a0 [60015.902489] kernel: ? iput+0x1a0/0x1a0 [60015.902491] kernel: list_lru_walk_one+0x47/0x70 [60015.902495] kernel: prune_icache_sb+0x39/0x50 [60015.902497] kernel: super_cache_scan+0x161/0x1f0 [60015.902501] kernel: do_shrink_slab+0x142/0x240 [60015.902505] kernel: shrink_slab+0x164/0x280 [60015.902509] kernel: shrink_node+0x2c8/0x6e0 [60015.902512] kernel: do_try_to_free_pages+0xcb/0x4b0 [60015.902514] kernel: try_to_free_pages+0xda/0x190 [60015.902516] kernel: __alloc_pages_slowpath.constprop.0+0x373/0xcc0 [60015.902521] kernel: ? __memcg_kmem_charge_page+0xc2/0x1e0 [60015.902525] kernel: __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x30a/0x340 [60015.902528] kernel: pipe_write+0x30b/0x5c0 [60015.902531] kernel: ? set_next_entity+0xad/0x1e0 [60015.902534] kernel: ? switch_mm_irqs_off+0x58/0x440 [60015.902538] kernel: __kernel_write+0x13a/0x2b0 [60015.902541] kernel: kernel_write+0x73/0x150 [60015.902543] kernel: send_cmd+0x7b/0xd0 [60015.902545] kernel: send_extent_data+0x5a3/0x6b0 [60015.902549] kernel: process_extent+0x19b/0xed0 [60015.902551] kernel: btrfs_ioctl_send+0x1434/0x17e0 [60015.902554] kernel: ? _btrfs_ioctl_send+0xe1/0x100 [60015.902557] kernel: _btrfs_ioctl_send+0xbf/0x100 [60015.902559] kernel: ? enqueue_entity+0x18c/0x7b0 [60015.902562] kernel: btrfs_ioctl+0x185f/0x2f80 [60015.902564] kernel: ? psi_task_change+0x84/0xc0 [60015.902569] kernel: ? _flat_send_IPI_mask+0x21/0x40 [60015.902572] kernel: ? check_preempt_curr+0x2f/0x70 [60015.902576] kernel: ? selinux_file_ioctl+0x137/0x1e0 [60015.902579] kernel: ? expand_files+0x1cb/0x1d0 [60015.902582] kernel: ? __x64_sys_ioctl+0x82/0xb0 [60015.902585] kernel: __x64_sys_ioctl+0x82/0xb0 [60015.902588] kernel: do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 [60015.902591] kernel: entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [60015.902595] kernel: RIP: 0033:0x7f158e38f0ab [60015.902599] kernel: Code: ff ff ff 85 c0 79 9b (...) [60015.902602] kernel: RSP: 002b:00007ffcb2519bf8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 [60015.902605] kernel: RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffcb251ae00 RCX: 00007f158e38f0ab [60015.902607] kernel: RDX: 00007ffcb2519cf0 RSI: 0000000040489426 RDI: 0000000000000004 [60015.902608] kernel: RBP: 0000000000000004 R08: 00007f158e297640 R09: 00007f158e297640 [60015.902610] kernel: R10: 0000000000000008 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 [60015.902612] kernel: R13: 0000000000000002 R14: 00007ffcb251aee0 R15: 0000558c1a83e2a0 [60015.902615] kernel: ---[ end trace 7bbc33e23bb887ae ]--- This happens because when writing to the pipe, by calling kernel_write(), we end up doing page allocations using GFP_HIGHUSER | __GFP_ACCOUNT as the gfp flags, which allow reclaim to happen if there is memory pressure. This allocation happens at fs/pipe.c:pipe_write(). If the reclaim is triggered, inode eviction can be triggered and that in turn can result in starting a transaction if the inode has a link count of 0. The transaction start happens early on during eviction, when we call btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_inode() at btrfs_evict_inode(). This happens if there is currently an open file descriptor for an inode with a link count of 0 and the reclaim task gets a reference on the inode before that descriptor is closed, in which case the reclaim task ends up doing the final iput that triggers the inode eviction. When we have assertions enabled (CONFIG_BTRFS_ASSERT=y), this triggers the following assertion at transaction.c:start_transaction(): /* Send isn't supposed to start transactions. */ ASSERT(current->journal_info != BTRFS_SEND_TRANS_STUB); And when assertions are not enabled, it triggers a crash since after that assertion we cast current->journal_info into a transaction handle pointer and then dereference it: if (current->journal_info) { WARN_ON(type & TRANS_EXTWRITERS); h = current->journal_info; refcount_inc(&h->use_count); (...) Which obviously results in a crash due to an invalid memory access. The same type of issue can happen during other memory allocations we do directly in the send code with kmalloc (and friends) as they use GFP_KERNEL and therefore may trigger reclaim too, which started to happen since 2016 after commite780b0d1c1("btrfs: send: use GFP_KERNEL everywhere"). The issue could be solved by setting up a NOFS context for the entire send operation so that reclaim could not be triggered when allocating memory or pages through kernel_write(). However that is not very friendly and we can in fact get rid of the send stub because: 1) The stub was introduced way back in 2014 by commita26e8c9f75("Btrfs: don't clear uptodate if the eb is under IO") to solve an issue exclusive to when send and balance are running in parallel, however there were other problems between balance and send and we do not allow anymore to have balance and send run concurrently since commit9e967495e0("Btrfs: prevent send failures and crashes due to concurrent relocation"). More generically the issues are between send and relocation, and that last commit eliminated only the possibility of having send and balance run concurrently, but shrinking a device also can trigger relocation, and on zoned filesystems we have relocation of partially used block groups triggered automatically as well. The previous patch that has a subject of: "btrfs: ensure relocation never runs while we have send operations running" Addresses all the remaining cases that can trigger relocation. 2) We can actually allow starting and even committing transactions while in a send context if needed because send is not holding any locks that would block the start or the commit of a transaction. So get rid of all the logic added by commita26e8c9f75("Btrfs: don't clear uptodate if the eb is under IO"). We can now always call clear_extent_buffer_uptodate() at verify_parent_transid() since send is the only case that uses commit roots without having a transaction open or without holding the commit_root_sem. Reported-by: Chris Murphy <lists@colorremedies.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CAJCQCtRQ57=qXo3kygwpwEBOU_CA_eKvdmjP52sU=eFvuVOEGw@mail.gmail.com/ Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This commit is contained in:
Filipe Manana
David Sterba
parent
1cea5cf0e6
commit
35b22c19af
|
|
@ -241,7 +241,6 @@ static int verify_parent_transid(struct extent_io_tree *io_tree,
|
|||
{
|
||||
struct extent_state *cached_state = NULL;
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
bool need_lock = (current->journal_info == BTRFS_SEND_TRANS_STUB);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!parent_transid || btrfs_header_generation(eb) == parent_transid)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
|
@ -249,9 +248,6 @@ static int verify_parent_transid(struct extent_io_tree *io_tree,
|
|||
if (atomic)
|
||||
return -EAGAIN;
|
||||
|
||||
if (need_lock)
|
||||
btrfs_tree_read_lock(eb);
|
||||
|
||||
lock_extent_bits(io_tree, eb->start, eb->start + eb->len - 1,
|
||||
&cached_state);
|
||||
if (extent_buffer_uptodate(eb) &&
|
||||
|
|
@ -264,22 +260,10 @@ static int verify_parent_transid(struct extent_io_tree *io_tree,
|
|||
eb->start,
|
||||
parent_transid, btrfs_header_generation(eb));
|
||||
ret = 1;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Things reading via commit roots that don't have normal protection,
|
||||
* like send, can have a really old block in cache that may point at a
|
||||
* block that has been freed and re-allocated. So don't clear uptodate
|
||||
* if we find an eb that is under IO (dirty/writeback) because we could
|
||||
* end up reading in the stale data and then writing it back out and
|
||||
* making everybody very sad.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!extent_buffer_under_io(eb))
|
||||
clear_extent_buffer_uptodate(eb);
|
||||
clear_extent_buffer_uptodate(eb);
|
||||
out:
|
||||
unlock_extent_cached(io_tree, eb->start, eb->start + eb->len - 1,
|
||||
&cached_state);
|
||||
if (need_lock)
|
||||
btrfs_tree_read_unlock(eb);
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -3545,13 +3545,7 @@ static int try_flush_qgroup(struct btrfs_root *root)
|
|||
struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans;
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Can't hold an open transaction or we run the risk of deadlocking,
|
||||
* and can't either be under the context of a send operation (where
|
||||
* current->journal_info is set to BTRFS_SEND_TRANS_STUB), as that
|
||||
* would result in a crash when starting a transaction and does not
|
||||
* make sense either (send is a read-only operation).
|
||||
*/
|
||||
/* Can't hold an open transaction or we run the risk of deadlocking. */
|
||||
ASSERT(current->journal_info == NULL);
|
||||
if (WARN_ON(current->journal_info))
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -7427,9 +7427,7 @@ long btrfs_ioctl_send(struct file *mnt_file, struct btrfs_ioctl_send_args *arg)
|
|||
fs_info->send_in_progress++;
|
||||
spin_unlock(&fs_info->send_reloc_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
current->journal_info = BTRFS_SEND_TRANS_STUB;
|
||||
ret = send_subvol(sctx);
|
||||
current->journal_info = NULL;
|
||||
spin_lock(&fs_info->send_reloc_lock);
|
||||
fs_info->send_in_progress--;
|
||||
spin_unlock(&fs_info->send_reloc_lock);
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -583,9 +583,6 @@ start_transaction(struct btrfs_root *root, unsigned int num_items,
|
|||
bool do_chunk_alloc = false;
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Send isn't supposed to start transactions. */
|
||||
ASSERT(current->journal_info != BTRFS_SEND_TRANS_STUB);
|
||||
|
||||
if (test_bit(BTRFS_FS_STATE_ERROR, &fs_info->fs_state))
|
||||
return ERR_PTR(-EROFS);
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -122,8 +122,6 @@ struct btrfs_transaction {
|
|||
|
||||
#define TRANS_EXTWRITERS (__TRANS_START | __TRANS_ATTACH)
|
||||
|
||||
#define BTRFS_SEND_TRANS_STUB ((void *)1)
|
||||
|
||||
struct btrfs_trans_handle {
|
||||
u64 transid;
|
||||
u64 bytes_reserved;
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue