hollalinux
/
linux-sg2042
mirror of https://github.com/sophgo/linux-riscv.git
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

make skb_copy_datagram_msg() et.al. preserve ->msg_iter on error 

Fixes the mess observed in e.g. rsync over a noisy link we'd been
seeing since last Summer.  What happens is that we copy part of
a datagram before noticing a checksum mismatch.  Datagram will be
resent, all right, but we want the next try go into the same place,
not after it...

All this family of primitives (copy/checksum and copy a datagram
into destination) is "all or nothing" sort of interface - either
we get 0 (meaning that copy had been successful) or we get an
error (and no way to tell how much had been copied before we ran
into whatever error it had been).  Make all of them leave iterator
unadvanced in case of errors - all callers must be able to cope
with that (an error might've been caught before the iterator had
been advanced), it costs very little to arrange, it's safer for
callers and actually fixes at least one bug in said callers.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
This commit is contained in:
Al Viro 2017-02-17 20:16:34 -05:00
parent 27c0e3748e
commit 3278682123
1 changed files with 14 additions and 9 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

23
net/core/datagram.c
View File

@ -398,7 +398,7 @@ int skb_copy_datagram_iter(const struct sk_buff *skb, int offset,
struct iov_iter *to, int len)
{
int start = skb_headlen(skb);
int i, copy = start - offset;
int i, copy = start - offset, start_off = offset, n;
struct sk_buff *frag_iter;
trace_skb_copy_datagram_iovec(skb, len);
@ -407,11 +407,12 @@ int skb_copy_datagram_iter(const struct sk_buff *skb, int offset,
if (copy > 0) {
if (copy > len)
copy = len;
if (copy_to_iter(skb->data + offset, copy, to) != copy)
n = copy_to_iter(skb->data + offset, copy, to);
offset += n;
if (n != copy)
goto short_copy;
if ((len -= copy) == 0)
return 0;
offset += copy;
}
/* Copy paged appendix. Hmm... why does this look so complicated? */
@ -425,13 +426,14 @@ int skb_copy_datagram_iter(const struct sk_buff *skb, int offset,
if ((copy = end - offset) > 0) {
if (copy > len)
copy = len;
if (copy_page_to_iter(skb_frag_page(frag),
n = copy_page_to_iter(skb_frag_page(frag),
frag->page_offset + offset -
start, copy, to) != copy)
start, copy, to);
offset += n;
if (n != copy)
goto short_copy;
if (!(len -= copy))
return 0;
offset += copy;
}
start = end;
}
@ -463,6 +465,7 @@ int skb_copy_datagram_iter(const struct sk_buff *skb, int offset,
*/
fault:
iov_iter_revert(to, offset - start_off);
return -EFAULT;
short_copy:
@ -613,7 +616,7 @@ static int skb_copy_and_csum_datagram(const struct sk_buff *skb, int offset,
__wsum *csump)
{
int start = skb_headlen(skb);
int i, copy = start - offset;
int i, copy = start - offset, start_off = offset;
struct sk_buff *frag_iter;
int pos = 0;
int n;
@ -623,11 +626,11 @@ static int skb_copy_and_csum_datagram(const struct sk_buff *skb, int offset,
if (copy > len)
copy = len;
n = csum_and_copy_to_iter(skb->data + offset, copy, csump, to);
offset += n;
if (n != copy)
goto fault;
if ((len -= copy) == 0)
return 0;
offset += copy;
pos = copy;
}
@ -649,12 +652,12 @@ static int skb_copy_and_csum_datagram(const struct sk_buff *skb, int offset,
offset - start, copy,
&csum2, to);
kunmap(page);
offset += n;
if (n != copy)
goto fault;
*csump = csum_block_add(*csump, csum2, pos);
if (!(len -= copy))
return 0;
offset += copy;
pos += copy;
}
start = end;
@ -687,6 +690,7 @@ static int skb_copy_and_csum_datagram(const struct sk_buff *skb, int offset,
return 0;
fault:
iov_iter_revert(to, offset - start_off);
return -EFAULT;
}
@ -771,6 +775,7 @@ int skb_copy_and_csum_datagram_msg(struct sk_buff *skb,
}
return 0;
csum_error:
iov_iter_revert(&msg->msg_iter, chunk);
return -EINVAL;
fault:
return -EFAULT;