sched/core: Rework and clarify prepare_lock_switch()
The prepare_lock_switch() function has an unused parameter, and also the function name was not descriptive. To improve readability and remove the extra parameter, do the following changes: * Move prepare_lock_switch() from kernel/sched/sched.h to kernel/sched/core.c, rename it to prepare_task(), and remove the unused parameter. * Split the smp_store_release() out from finish_lock_switch() to a function named finish_task. * Comments ajdustments. Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <rodrigosiqueiramelo@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171215140603.gxe5i2y6fg5ojfpp@smtp.gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
cb1f34ddcc
commit
31cb1bc0dc
|
@ -2045,7 +2045,7 @@ try_to_wake_up(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int state, int wake_flags)
|
|||
* If the owning (remote) CPU is still in the middle of schedule() with
|
||||
* this task as prev, wait until its done referencing the task.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Pairs with the smp_store_release() in finish_lock_switch().
|
||||
* Pairs with the smp_store_release() in finish_task().
|
||||
*
|
||||
* This ensures that tasks getting woken will be fully ordered against
|
||||
* their previous state and preserve Program Order.
|
||||
|
@ -2571,6 +2571,50 @@ fire_sched_out_preempt_notifiers(struct task_struct *curr,
|
|||
|
||||
#endif /* CONFIG_PREEMPT_NOTIFIERS */
|
||||
|
||||
static inline void prepare_task(struct task_struct *next)
|
||||
{
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Claim the task as running, we do this before switching to it
|
||||
* such that any running task will have this set.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
next->on_cpu = 1;
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static inline void finish_task(struct task_struct *prev)
|
||||
{
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* After ->on_cpu is cleared, the task can be moved to a different CPU.
|
||||
* We must ensure this doesn't happen until the switch is completely
|
||||
* finished.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* In particular, the load of prev->state in finish_task_switch() must
|
||||
* happen before this.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Pairs with the smp_cond_load_acquire() in try_to_wake_up().
|
||||
*/
|
||||
smp_store_release(&prev->on_cpu, 0);
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static inline void finish_lock_switch(struct rq *rq)
|
||||
{
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK
|
||||
/* this is a valid case when another task releases the spinlock */
|
||||
rq->lock.owner = current;
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If we are tracking spinlock dependencies then we have to
|
||||
* fix up the runqueue lock - which gets 'carried over' from
|
||||
* prev into current:
|
||||
*/
|
||||
spin_acquire(&rq->lock.dep_map, 0, 0, _THIS_IP_);
|
||||
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&rq->lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* prepare_task_switch - prepare to switch tasks
|
||||
* @rq: the runqueue preparing to switch
|
||||
|
@ -2591,7 +2635,7 @@ prepare_task_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev,
|
|||
sched_info_switch(rq, prev, next);
|
||||
perf_event_task_sched_out(prev, next);
|
||||
fire_sched_out_preempt_notifiers(prev, next);
|
||||
prepare_lock_switch(rq, next);
|
||||
prepare_task(next);
|
||||
prepare_arch_switch(next);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -2646,7 +2690,7 @@ static struct rq *finish_task_switch(struct task_struct *prev)
|
|||
* the scheduled task must drop that reference.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* We must observe prev->state before clearing prev->on_cpu (in
|
||||
* finish_lock_switch), otherwise a concurrent wakeup can get prev
|
||||
* finish_task), otherwise a concurrent wakeup can get prev
|
||||
* running on another CPU and we could rave with its RUNNING -> DEAD
|
||||
* transition, resulting in a double drop.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
@ -2663,7 +2707,8 @@ static struct rq *finish_task_switch(struct task_struct *prev)
|
|||
* to use.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
smp_mb__after_unlock_lock();
|
||||
finish_lock_switch(rq, prev);
|
||||
finish_task(prev);
|
||||
finish_lock_switch(rq);
|
||||
finish_arch_post_lock_switch();
|
||||
|
||||
fire_sched_in_preempt_notifiers(current);
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1328,47 +1328,6 @@ static inline int task_on_rq_migrating(struct task_struct *p)
|
|||
# define finish_arch_post_lock_switch() do { } while (0)
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
static inline void prepare_lock_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *next)
|
||||
{
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We can optimise this out completely for !SMP, because the
|
||||
* SMP rebalancing from interrupt is the only thing that cares
|
||||
* here.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
next->on_cpu = 1;
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static inline void finish_lock_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
|
||||
{
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* After ->on_cpu is cleared, the task can be moved to a different CPU.
|
||||
* We must ensure this doesn't happen until the switch is completely
|
||||
* finished.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* In particular, the load of prev->state in finish_task_switch() must
|
||||
* happen before this.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Pairs with the smp_cond_load_acquire() in try_to_wake_up().
|
||||
*/
|
||||
smp_store_release(&prev->on_cpu, 0);
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK
|
||||
/* this is a valid case when another task releases the spinlock */
|
||||
rq->lock.owner = current;
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If we are tracking spinlock dependencies then we have to
|
||||
* fix up the runqueue lock - which gets 'carried over' from
|
||||
* prev into current:
|
||||
*/
|
||||
spin_acquire(&rq->lock.dep_map, 0, 0, _THIS_IP_);
|
||||
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&rq->lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* wake flags
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue