x86: Fix various duplicate-word comment typos

[ mingo: Consolidated 4 very similar patches into one, it's silly to spread this out. ]

Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <wangborong@cdjrlc.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220715044809.20572-1-wangborong@cdjrlc.com
This commit is contained in:
Jason Wang 2022-07-15 12:48:09 +08:00 committed by Borislav Petkov
parent 039f0e054a
commit 3163600cab
4 changed files with 4 additions and 4 deletions

View File

@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ static u32 *iommu_gatt_base; /* Remapping table */
* of only flushing when an mapping is reused. With it true the GART is
* flushed for every mapping. Problem is that doing the lazy flush seems
* to trigger bugs with some popular PCI cards, in particular 3ware (but
* has been also also seen with Qlogic at least).
* has been also seen with Qlogic at least).
*/
static int iommu_fullflush = 1;

View File

@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
/*
* Using 512M as goal, in case kexec will load kernel_big
* that will do the on-position decompress, and could overlap with
* with the gart aperture that is used.
* the gart aperture that is used.
* Sequence:
* kernel_small
* ==> kexec (with kdump trigger path or gart still enabled)

View File

@ -2570,7 +2570,7 @@ static int prepare_vmcs02(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vmcs12 *vmcs12,
* bits which we consider mandatory enabled.
* The CR0_READ_SHADOW is what L2 should have expected to read given
* the specifications by L1; It's not enough to take
* vmcs12->cr0_read_shadow because on our cr0_guest_host_mask we we
* vmcs12->cr0_read_shadow because on our cr0_guest_host_mask we
* have more bits than L1 expected.
*/
vmx_set_cr0(vcpu, vmcs12->guest_cr0);

View File

@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ static void __init do_add_efi_memmap(void)
}
/*
* Given add_efi_memmap defaults to 0 and there there is no alternative
* Given add_efi_memmap defaults to 0 and there is no alternative
* e820 mechanism for soft-reserved memory, import the full EFI memory
* map if soft reservations are present and enabled. Otherwise, the
* mechanism to disable the kernel's consideration of EFI_MEMORY_SP is