From 2e13bde1315373cf7e9fb7dc4330d0d2a6bd5417 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tony Lu Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2022 14:52:21 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] net/smc: Add comment for smc_tx_pending The previous patch introduces a lock-free version of smc_tx_work() to solve unnecessary lock contention, which is expected to be held lock. So this adds comment to remind people to keep an eye out for locks. Suggested-by: Stefan Raspl Signed-off-by: Tony Lu Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- net/smc/smc_tx.c | 7 ++++++- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/net/smc/smc_tx.c b/net/smc/smc_tx.c index a96ce162825e..5df3940d4543 100644 --- a/net/smc/smc_tx.c +++ b/net/smc/smc_tx.c @@ -611,6 +611,10 @@ int smc_tx_sndbuf_nonempty(struct smc_connection *conn) return rc; } +/* Wakeup sndbuf consumers from process context + * since there is more data to transmit. The caller + * must hold sock lock. + */ void smc_tx_pending(struct smc_connection *conn) { struct smc_sock *smc = container_of(conn, struct smc_sock, conn); @@ -626,7 +630,8 @@ void smc_tx_pending(struct smc_connection *conn) } /* Wakeup sndbuf consumers from process context - * since there is more data to transmit + * since there is more data to transmit in locked + * sock. */ void smc_tx_work(struct work_struct *work) {