seccomp: Selftest for detection of filter flag support
Userspace needs to be able to reliably detect the support of a filter flag. A good way of doing that is by attempting to enter filter mode, with the flag bit(s) in question set, and a NULL pointer for the args parameter of seccomp(2). EFAULT indicates that the flag is valid and EINVAL indicates that the flag is invalid. This patch adds a selftest that can be used to test this method of detection in userspace. Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
0ddec0fc89
commit
2b7ea5b5b5
|
@ -1835,6 +1835,66 @@ TEST(seccomp_syscall_mode_lock)
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Test detection of known and unknown filter flags. Userspace needs to be able
|
||||
* to check if a filter flag is supported by the current kernel and a good way
|
||||
* of doing that is by attempting to enter filter mode, with the flag bit in
|
||||
* question set, and a NULL pointer for the _args_ parameter. EFAULT indicates
|
||||
* that the flag is valid and EINVAL indicates that the flag is invalid.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
TEST(detect_seccomp_filter_flags)
|
||||
{
|
||||
unsigned int flags[] = { SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_TSYNC };
|
||||
unsigned int flag, all_flags;
|
||||
int i;
|
||||
long ret;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Test detection of known-good filter flags */
|
||||
for (i = 0, all_flags = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(flags); i++) {
|
||||
flag = flags[i];
|
||||
ret = seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, flag, NULL);
|
||||
ASSERT_NE(ENOSYS, errno) {
|
||||
TH_LOG("Kernel does not support seccomp syscall!");
|
||||
}
|
||||
EXPECT_EQ(-1, ret);
|
||||
EXPECT_EQ(EFAULT, errno) {
|
||||
TH_LOG("Failed to detect that a known-good filter flag (0x%X) is supported!",
|
||||
flag);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
all_flags |= flag;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Test detection of all known-good filter flags */
|
||||
ret = seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, all_flags, NULL);
|
||||
EXPECT_EQ(-1, ret);
|
||||
EXPECT_EQ(EFAULT, errno) {
|
||||
TH_LOG("Failed to detect that all known-good filter flags (0x%X) are supported!",
|
||||
all_flags);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Test detection of an unknown filter flag */
|
||||
flag = -1;
|
||||
ret = seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, flag, NULL);
|
||||
EXPECT_EQ(-1, ret);
|
||||
EXPECT_EQ(EINVAL, errno) {
|
||||
TH_LOG("Failed to detect that an unknown filter flag (0x%X) is unsupported!",
|
||||
flag);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Test detection of an unknown filter flag that may simply need to be
|
||||
* added to this test
|
||||
*/
|
||||
flag = flags[ARRAY_SIZE(flags) - 1] << 1;
|
||||
ret = seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, flag, NULL);
|
||||
EXPECT_EQ(-1, ret);
|
||||
EXPECT_EQ(EINVAL, errno) {
|
||||
TH_LOG("Failed to detect that an unknown filter flag (0x%X) is unsupported! Does a new flag need to be added to this test?",
|
||||
flag);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
TEST(TSYNC_first)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct sock_filter filter[] = {
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue