hfsplus: incorrect return value

In case of memory allocation error, the return should be -ENOMEM, instead
of -ENOSPC.

Signed-off-by: Chengyu Song <csong84@gatech.edu>
Reviewed-by: Sergei Antonov <saproj@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
Chengyu Song 2015-04-16 12:47:12 -07:00 committed by Linus Torvalds
parent 7ce844a20e
commit 27a4e3884e
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions

View File

@ -434,7 +434,7 @@ static int hfsplus_symlink(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry,
{ {
struct hfsplus_sb_info *sbi = HFSPLUS_SB(dir->i_sb); struct hfsplus_sb_info *sbi = HFSPLUS_SB(dir->i_sb);
struct inode *inode; struct inode *inode;
int res = -ENOSPC; int res = -ENOMEM;
mutex_lock(&sbi->vh_mutex); mutex_lock(&sbi->vh_mutex);
inode = hfsplus_new_inode(dir->i_sb, S_IFLNK | S_IRWXUGO); inode = hfsplus_new_inode(dir->i_sb, S_IFLNK | S_IRWXUGO);
@ -476,7 +476,7 @@ static int hfsplus_mknod(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry,
{ {
struct hfsplus_sb_info *sbi = HFSPLUS_SB(dir->i_sb); struct hfsplus_sb_info *sbi = HFSPLUS_SB(dir->i_sb);
struct inode *inode; struct inode *inode;
int res = -ENOSPC; int res = -ENOMEM;
mutex_lock(&sbi->vh_mutex); mutex_lock(&sbi->vh_mutex);
inode = hfsplus_new_inode(dir->i_sb, mode); inode = hfsplus_new_inode(dir->i_sb, mode);