lockdep: remove extra "irq" string
Impact: clarify lockdep printk text print_irq_inversion_bug() gets handed state strings of the form "HARDIRQ", "SOFTIRQ", "RECLAIM_FS" and appends "-irq-{un,}safe" to them, which is either redudant for *IRQ or confusing in the RECLAIM_FS case. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> LKML-Reference: <1236175192.5330.7585.camel@laptop> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
This commit is contained in:
parent
1c21f14ec4
commit
26575e28df
|
@ -1900,9 +1900,9 @@ print_irq_inversion_bug(struct task_struct *curr, struct lock_class *other,
|
|||
curr->comm, task_pid_nr(curr));
|
||||
print_lock(this);
|
||||
if (forwards)
|
||||
printk("but this lock took another, %s-irq-unsafe lock in the past:\n", irqclass);
|
||||
printk("but this lock took another, %s-unsafe lock in the past:\n", irqclass);
|
||||
else
|
||||
printk("but this lock was taken by another, %s-irq-safe lock in the past:\n", irqclass);
|
||||
printk("but this lock was taken by another, %s-safe lock in the past:\n", irqclass);
|
||||
print_lock_name(other);
|
||||
printk("\n\nand interrupts could create inverse lock ordering between them.\n\n");
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue