bitfield: add explicit inclusions to the example
It's not obvious that bitfield.h doesn't guarantee the bits.h inclusion and the example in the former is confusing. Some developers think that it's okay to just include bitfield.h to get it working. Change example to explicitly include necessary headers in order to avoid confusion. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220207123341.47533-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com Fixes:3e9b3112ec
("add basic register-field manipulation macros") Depends-on:8bd9cb51da
("locking/atomics, asm-generic: Move some macros from <linux/bitops.h> to a new <linux/bits.h> file") Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Reported-by: Jan Dąbroś <jsd@semihalf.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
f334f5668b
commit
25cb5b7ac6
|
@ -19,6 +19,9 @@
|
|||
*
|
||||
* Example:
|
||||
*
|
||||
* #include <linux/bitfield.h>
|
||||
* #include <linux/bits.h>
|
||||
*
|
||||
* #define REG_FIELD_A GENMASK(6, 0)
|
||||
* #define REG_FIELD_B BIT(7)
|
||||
* #define REG_FIELD_C GENMASK(15, 8)
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue