drm: fix minor number range calculation
Currently, both ranges overlap. Fix the limits so both ranges are mutually exclusive. Also use the occasion to convert whitespaces to tabs. Signed-off-by: Kristian Høgsberg <krh@bitplanet.net> (fixed up tabs and adjust commit-msg accordingly) Signed-off-by: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
90254ac084
commit
24f4003267
|
@ -113,12 +113,12 @@ static int drm_minor_get_id(struct drm_device *dev, int type)
|
||||||
int base = 0, limit = 63;
|
int base = 0, limit = 63;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (type == DRM_MINOR_CONTROL) {
|
if (type == DRM_MINOR_CONTROL) {
|
||||||
base += 64;
|
base += 64;
|
||||||
limit = base + 127;
|
limit = base + 63;
|
||||||
} else if (type == DRM_MINOR_RENDER) {
|
} else if (type == DRM_MINOR_RENDER) {
|
||||||
base += 128;
|
base += 128;
|
||||||
limit = base + 255;
|
limit = base + 63;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
|
mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
|
||||||
ret = idr_alloc(&drm_minors_idr, NULL, base, limit, GFP_KERNEL);
|
ret = idr_alloc(&drm_minors_idr, NULL, base, limit, GFP_KERNEL);
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue