fs/proc/task_mmu.c: cleanup the "tail_vma" horror in m_next()
1. Kill the first "vma != NULL" check. Firstly this is not possible, m_next() won't be called if ->start() or the previous ->next() returns NULL. And if it was possible the 2nd "vma != tail_vma" check is buggy, we should not wrongly return ->tail_vma. 2. Make this function readable. The logic is very simple, we should return check "vma != tail" once and return "vm_next || tail_vma". Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org> Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
59b4bf12d4
commit
23d54837e4
|
@ -210,15 +210,13 @@ out:
|
|||
static void *m_next(struct seq_file *m, void *v, loff_t *pos)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct proc_maps_private *priv = m->private;
|
||||
struct vm_area_struct *vma = v;
|
||||
struct vm_area_struct *tail_vma = priv->tail_vma;
|
||||
struct vm_area_struct *next;
|
||||
struct vm_area_struct *vma = v, *next = NULL;
|
||||
|
||||
(*pos)++;
|
||||
if (vma && (vma != tail_vma) && vma->vm_next)
|
||||
return vma->vm_next;
|
||||
if (vma != tail_vma)
|
||||
next = vma->vm_next ?: tail_vma;
|
||||
|
||||
next = (vma != tail_vma) ? tail_vma : NULL;
|
||||
if (!next)
|
||||
vma_stop(priv);
|
||||
return next;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue