drm/i915: Add missing 'else' to intel_digital_port_connected()
intel_digital_port_connected() lacks one 'else'. There's no actual harm in not having it since each branch has an unconditional return, so it can't accidentally end up in taking two branches instead of just the one. But let's be consistent and add the 'else' anyway. Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1455201868-31527-1-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
0780cd36c7
commit
22824fac94
|
@ -4561,7 +4561,7 @@ bool intel_digital_port_connected(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
|
|||
{
|
||||
if (HAS_PCH_IBX(dev_priv))
|
||||
return ibx_digital_port_connected(dev_priv, port);
|
||||
if (HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev_priv))
|
||||
else if (HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev_priv))
|
||||
return cpt_digital_port_connected(dev_priv, port);
|
||||
else if (IS_BROXTON(dev_priv))
|
||||
return bxt_digital_port_connected(dev_priv, port);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue