mfd: twl4030 irq fixes
The TWL4030 IRQ handler has a bug which leads to spinlock lock-up. It is calling the 'unmask' function in a process context. :The mask/unmask/ack functions are only designed to be called from the IRQ handler code, or the proper API interfaces found in linux/interrupt.h. Also there is no need to have IRQ chaining mechanism. The right way to handle this is to claim the parent interrupt as a standard interrupt and arrange for handle_twl4030_pih to take care of the rest of the devices. Mail thread on this issue can be found at: http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=124629940123396&w=2 Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> Tested-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
a33a052f19
commit
1cef8e4107
|
@ -180,14 +180,9 @@ static struct completion irq_event;
|
|||
static int twl4030_irq_thread(void *data)
|
||||
{
|
||||
long irq = (long)data;
|
||||
struct irq_desc *desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
|
||||
static unsigned i2c_errors;
|
||||
static const unsigned max_i2c_errors = 100;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!desc) {
|
||||
pr_err("twl4030: Invalid IRQ: %ld\n", irq);
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
current->flags |= PF_NOFREEZE;
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -240,7 +235,7 @@ static int twl4030_irq_thread(void *data)
|
|||
}
|
||||
local_irq_enable();
|
||||
|
||||
desc->chip->unmask(irq);
|
||||
enable_irq(irq);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
@ -255,25 +250,13 @@ static int twl4030_irq_thread(void *data)
|
|||
* thread. All we do here is acknowledge and mask the interrupt and wakeup
|
||||
* the kernel thread.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static void handle_twl4030_pih(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
|
||||
static irqreturn_t handle_twl4030_pih(int irq, void *devid)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* Acknowledge, clear *AND* mask the interrupt... */
|
||||
desc->chip->ack(irq);
|
||||
complete(&irq_event);
|
||||
disable_irq_nosync(irq);
|
||||
complete(devid);
|
||||
return IRQ_HANDLED;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static struct task_struct *start_twl4030_irq_thread(long irq)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct task_struct *thread;
|
||||
|
||||
init_completion(&irq_event);
|
||||
thread = kthread_run(twl4030_irq_thread, (void *)irq, "twl4030-irq");
|
||||
if (!thread)
|
||||
pr_err("twl4030: could not create irq %ld thread!\n", irq);
|
||||
|
||||
return thread;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*----------------------------------------------------------------------*/
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
@ -734,18 +717,28 @@ int twl_init_irq(int irq_num, unsigned irq_base, unsigned irq_end)
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* install an irq handler to demultiplex the TWL4030 interrupt */
|
||||
task = start_twl4030_irq_thread(irq_num);
|
||||
if (!task) {
|
||||
pr_err("twl4030: irq thread FAIL\n");
|
||||
status = -ESRCH;
|
||||
goto fail;
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
init_completion(&irq_event);
|
||||
|
||||
status = request_irq(irq_num, handle_twl4030_pih, IRQF_DISABLED,
|
||||
"TWL4030-PIH", &irq_event);
|
||||
if (status < 0) {
|
||||
pr_err("twl4030: could not claim irq%d: %d\n", irq_num, status);
|
||||
goto fail_rqirq;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
set_irq_data(irq_num, task);
|
||||
set_irq_chained_handler(irq_num, handle_twl4030_pih);
|
||||
|
||||
task = kthread_run(twl4030_irq_thread, (void *)irq_num, "twl4030-irq");
|
||||
if (IS_ERR(task)) {
|
||||
pr_err("twl4030: could not create irq %d thread!\n", irq_num);
|
||||
status = PTR_ERR(task);
|
||||
goto fail_kthread;
|
||||
}
|
||||
return status;
|
||||
|
||||
fail_kthread:
|
||||
free_irq(irq_num, &irq_event);
|
||||
fail_rqirq:
|
||||
/* clean up twl4030_sih_setup */
|
||||
fail:
|
||||
for (i = irq_base; i < irq_end; i++)
|
||||
set_irq_chip_and_handler(i, NULL, NULL);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue