exofs: remove BKL from super operations
the two places inside exofs that where taking the BKL were: exofs_put_super() - .put_super and exofs_sync_fs() - which is .sync_fs and is also called from .write_super. Now exofs_sync_fs() is protected from itself by also taking the sb_lock. exofs_put_super() directly calls exofs_sync_fs() so there is no danger between these two either. In anyway there is absolutely nothing dangerous been done inside exofs_sync_fs(). Unless there is some subtle race with the actual lifetime of the super_block in regard to .put_super and some other parts of the VFS. Which is highly unlikely. Signed-off-by: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
This commit is contained in:
parent
88a0a53d70
commit
1ba50bbe93
|
@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ int exofs_sync_fs(struct super_block *sb, int wait)
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
lock_super(sb);
|
||||
lock_kernel();
|
||||
sbi = sb->s_fs_info;
|
||||
fscb->s_nextid = cpu_to_le64(sbi->s_nextid);
|
||||
fscb->s_numfiles = cpu_to_le32(sbi->s_numfiles);
|
||||
|
@ -245,7 +244,6 @@ int exofs_sync_fs(struct super_block *sb, int wait)
|
|||
out:
|
||||
if (or)
|
||||
osd_end_request(or);
|
||||
unlock_kernel();
|
||||
unlock_super(sb);
|
||||
kfree(fscb);
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
|
@ -268,8 +266,6 @@ static void exofs_put_super(struct super_block *sb)
|
|||
int num_pend;
|
||||
struct exofs_sb_info *sbi = sb->s_fs_info;
|
||||
|
||||
lock_kernel();
|
||||
|
||||
if (sb->s_dirt)
|
||||
exofs_write_super(sb);
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -286,8 +282,6 @@ static void exofs_put_super(struct super_block *sb)
|
|||
osduld_put_device(sbi->s_dev);
|
||||
kfree(sb->s_fs_info);
|
||||
sb->s_fs_info = NULL;
|
||||
|
||||
unlock_kernel();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue