bridge: simplify br_getlink() a bit
Static checkers complain that we should maybe set "ret" before we do the "goto out;". They interpret the NULL return from br_port_get_rtnl() as a failure and forgetting to set the error code is a common bug in this situation. The code is confusing but it's actually correct. We are returning zero deliberately. Let's re-write it a bit to be more clear. Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Acked-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
5c66cfe078
commit
1b846f9282
|
@ -311,17 +311,14 @@ errout:
|
|||
int br_getlink(struct sk_buff *skb, u32 pid, u32 seq,
|
||||
struct net_device *dev, u32 filter_mask)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int err = 0;
|
||||
struct net_bridge_port *port = br_port_get_rtnl(dev);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!port && !(filter_mask & RTEXT_FILTER_BRVLAN) &&
|
||||
!(filter_mask & RTEXT_FILTER_BRVLAN_COMPRESSED))
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
err = br_fill_ifinfo(skb, port, pid, seq, RTM_NEWLINK, NLM_F_MULTI,
|
||||
filter_mask, dev);
|
||||
out:
|
||||
return err;
|
||||
return br_fill_ifinfo(skb, port, pid, seq, RTM_NEWLINK, NLM_F_MULTI,
|
||||
filter_mask, dev);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int br_vlan_info(struct net_bridge *br, struct net_bridge_port *p,
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue