regmap: avoid -Wint-in-bool-context warning

When we pass the result of a multiplication as the timeout or the delay,
we can get a warning from gcc-7:

drivers/mmc/host/bcm2835.c:596:149: error: '*' in boolean context, suggest '&&' instead [-Werror=int-in-bool-context]
drivers/mfd/arizona-core.c:247:195: error: '*' in boolean context, suggest '&&' instead [-Werror=int-in-bool-context]
drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_hdmi_i2c.c:49:27: error: '*' in boolean context, suggest '&&' instead [-Werror=int-in-bool-context]

The warning is a bit questionable inside of a macro, but this is
intentional on the side of the gcc developers.  It is also an indication
of another problem: we evaluate the timeout and sleep arguments multiple
times, which can have undesired side-effects when those are complex
expressions.

This changes the two regmap variants to use local variables for storing
copies of the timeouts.  This adds some more type safety, and avoids both
the double-evaluation and the gcc warning.

Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81484
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170726133756.2161367-1-arnd@arndb.de
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Arnd Bergmann 2017-10-13 14:12:45 +02:00 committed by Mark Brown
parent 89d5788315
commit 1b0c22e455
1 changed files with 14 additions and 10 deletions

View File

@ -120,22 +120,24 @@ struct reg_sequence {
*/
#define regmap_read_poll_timeout(map, addr, val, cond, sleep_us, timeout_us) \
({ \
ktime_t __timeout = ktime_add_us(ktime_get(), timeout_us); \
u64 __timeout_us = (timeout_us); \
unsigned long __sleep_us = (sleep_us); \
ktime_t __timeout = ktime_add_us(ktime_get(), __timeout_us); \
int __ret; \
might_sleep_if(sleep_us); \
might_sleep_if(__sleep_us); \
for (;;) { \
__ret = regmap_read((map), (addr), &(val)); \
if (__ret) \
break; \
if (cond) \
break; \
if ((timeout_us) && \
if ((__timeout_us) && \
ktime_compare(ktime_get(), __timeout) > 0) { \
__ret = regmap_read((map), (addr), &(val)); \
break; \
} \
if (sleep_us) \
usleep_range(((sleep_us) >> 2) + 1, sleep_us); \
if (__sleep_us) \
usleep_range((__sleep_us >> 2) + 1, __sleep_us); \
} \
__ret ?: ((cond) ? 0 : -ETIMEDOUT); \
})
@ -160,21 +162,23 @@ struct reg_sequence {
*/
#define regmap_field_read_poll_timeout(field, val, cond, sleep_us, timeout_us) \
({ \
ktime_t timeout = ktime_add_us(ktime_get(), timeout_us); \
u64 __timeout_us = (timeout_us); \
unsigned long __sleep_us = (sleep_us); \
ktime_t timeout = ktime_add_us(ktime_get(), __timeout_us); \
int pollret; \
might_sleep_if(sleep_us); \
might_sleep_if(__sleep_us); \
for (;;) { \
pollret = regmap_field_read((field), &(val)); \
if (pollret) \
break; \
if (cond) \
break; \
if (timeout_us && ktime_compare(ktime_get(), timeout) > 0) { \
if (__timeout_us && ktime_compare(ktime_get(), timeout) > 0) { \
pollret = regmap_field_read((field), &(val)); \
break; \
} \
if (sleep_us) \
usleep_range((sleep_us >> 2) + 1, sleep_us); \
if (__sleep_us) \
usleep_range((__sleep_us >> 2) + 1, __sleep_us); \
} \
pollret ?: ((cond) ? 0 : -ETIMEDOUT); \
})