e1000: Use time_after() for time comparison
To be future-proof and for better readability the time comparisons are modified to use time_after() instead of plain, error-prone math. Signed-off-by: Manuel Schölling <manuel.schoelling@gmx.de> Tested-by: Aaron Brown <aaron.f.brown@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
c46d150404
commit
1aa65f4d7f
|
@ -1460,7 +1460,8 @@ static int e1000_run_loopback_test(struct e1000_adapter *adapter)
|
||||||
* enough time to complete the receives, if it's
|
* enough time to complete the receives, if it's
|
||||||
* exceeded, break and error off
|
* exceeded, break and error off
|
||||||
*/
|
*/
|
||||||
} while (good_cnt < 64 && jiffies < (time + 20));
|
} while (good_cnt < 64 && time_after(time + 20, jiffies));
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (good_cnt != 64) {
|
if (good_cnt != 64) {
|
||||||
ret_val = 13; /* ret_val is the same as mis-compare */
|
ret_val = 13; /* ret_val is the same as mis-compare */
|
||||||
break;
|
break;
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue