oprofile: Use pr_warn instead of pr_warning

As said in commit f2c2cbcc35 ("powerpc: Use pr_warn instead of
pr_warning"), removing pr_warning so all logging messages use a
consistent <prefix>_warn style. Let's do it.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191018031850.48498-17-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Robert Richter <rric@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
This commit is contained in:
Kefeng Wang 2019-10-18 11:18:34 +08:00 committed by Petr Mladek
parent e2f04da75c
commit 19e2b4b370
1 changed files with 4 additions and 4 deletions

View File

@ -46,8 +46,8 @@ static void op_overflow_handler(struct perf_event *event,
if (id != num_counters)
oprofile_add_sample(regs, id);
else
pr_warning("oprofile: ignoring spurious overflow "
"on cpu %u\n", cpu);
pr_warn("oprofile: ignoring spurious overflow on cpu %u\n",
cpu);
}
/*
@ -88,8 +88,8 @@ static int op_create_counter(int cpu, int event)
if (pevent->state != PERF_EVENT_STATE_ACTIVE) {
perf_event_release_kernel(pevent);
pr_warning("oprofile: failed to enable event %d "
"on CPU %d\n", event, cpu);
pr_warn("oprofile: failed to enable event %d on CPU %d\n",
event, cpu);
return -EBUSY;
}