[S390] fix ext2_find_next_bit
ext4 does not work on s390 because ext2_find_next_bit is broken. Fortunately this function is only used by ext4. The function uses ffs which does not work analog to ffz. The result of ffs has an offset of 1 which is not taken into account. To fix this use the low level __ffs_word function directly instead of the ill defined ffs. In addition the patch improves find_next_zero_bit and ext2_find_next_zero_bit by passing the bit offset into __ffz_word instead of adding it after the function call returned. Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
16f7f9564c
commit
152382af40
|
@ -709,7 +709,7 @@ static inline int find_next_zero_bit (const unsigned long * addr,
|
|||
* __ffz_word returns __BITOPS_WORDSIZE
|
||||
* if no zero bit is present in the word.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
set = __ffz_word(0, *p >> bit) + bit;
|
||||
set = __ffz_word(bit, *p >> bit);
|
||||
if (set >= size)
|
||||
return size + offset;
|
||||
if (set < __BITOPS_WORDSIZE)
|
||||
|
@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ static inline int ext2_find_next_zero_bit(void *vaddr, unsigned long size,
|
|||
* s390 version of ffz returns __BITOPS_WORDSIZE
|
||||
* if no zero bit is present in the word.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
set = ffz(__load_ulong_le(p, 0) >> bit) + bit;
|
||||
set = __ffz_word(bit, __load_ulong_le(p, 0) >> bit);
|
||||
if (set >= size)
|
||||
return size + offset;
|
||||
if (set < __BITOPS_WORDSIZE)
|
||||
|
@ -865,7 +865,7 @@ static inline int ext2_find_next_bit(void *vaddr, unsigned long size,
|
|||
* s390 version of ffz returns __BITOPS_WORDSIZE
|
||||
* if no zero bit is present in the word.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
set = ffs(__load_ulong_le(p, 0) >> bit) + bit;
|
||||
set = __ffs_word(0, __load_ulong_le(p, 0) & (~0UL << bit));
|
||||
if (set >= size)
|
||||
return size + offset;
|
||||
if (set < __BITOPS_WORDSIZE)
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue