ipsec: Fix aborted xfrm policy dump crash
An independent security researcher, Mohamed Ghannam, has reported
this vulnerability to Beyond Security's SecuriTeam Secure Disclosure
program.
The xfrm_dump_policy_done function expects xfrm_dump_policy to
have been called at least once or it will crash. This can be
triggered if a dump fails because the target socket's receive
buffer is full.
This patch fixes it by using the cb->start mechanism to ensure that
the initialisation is always done regardless of the buffer situation.
Fixes: 12a169e7d8
("ipsec: Put dumpers on the dump list")
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
10a7ef3367
commit
1137b5e252
|
@ -1693,32 +1693,34 @@ static int dump_one_policy(struct xfrm_policy *xp, int dir, int count, void *ptr
|
|||
|
||||
static int xfrm_dump_policy_done(struct netlink_callback *cb)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct xfrm_policy_walk *walk = (struct xfrm_policy_walk *) &cb->args[1];
|
||||
struct xfrm_policy_walk *walk = (struct xfrm_policy_walk *)cb->args;
|
||||
struct net *net = sock_net(cb->skb->sk);
|
||||
|
||||
xfrm_policy_walk_done(walk, net);
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int xfrm_dump_policy_start(struct netlink_callback *cb)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct xfrm_policy_walk *walk = (struct xfrm_policy_walk *)cb->args;
|
||||
|
||||
BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(*walk) > sizeof(cb->args));
|
||||
|
||||
xfrm_policy_walk_init(walk, XFRM_POLICY_TYPE_ANY);
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int xfrm_dump_policy(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct net *net = sock_net(skb->sk);
|
||||
struct xfrm_policy_walk *walk = (struct xfrm_policy_walk *) &cb->args[1];
|
||||
struct xfrm_policy_walk *walk = (struct xfrm_policy_walk *)cb->args;
|
||||
struct xfrm_dump_info info;
|
||||
|
||||
BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct xfrm_policy_walk) >
|
||||
sizeof(cb->args) - sizeof(cb->args[0]));
|
||||
|
||||
info.in_skb = cb->skb;
|
||||
info.out_skb = skb;
|
||||
info.nlmsg_seq = cb->nlh->nlmsg_seq;
|
||||
info.nlmsg_flags = NLM_F_MULTI;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!cb->args[0]) {
|
||||
cb->args[0] = 1;
|
||||
xfrm_policy_walk_init(walk, XFRM_POLICY_TYPE_ANY);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
(void) xfrm_policy_walk(net, walk, dump_one_policy, &info);
|
||||
|
||||
return skb->len;
|
||||
|
@ -2474,6 +2476,7 @@ static const struct nla_policy xfrma_spd_policy[XFRMA_SPD_MAX+1] = {
|
|||
|
||||
static const struct xfrm_link {
|
||||
int (*doit)(struct sk_buff *, struct nlmsghdr *, struct nlattr **);
|
||||
int (*start)(struct netlink_callback *);
|
||||
int (*dump)(struct sk_buff *, struct netlink_callback *);
|
||||
int (*done)(struct netlink_callback *);
|
||||
const struct nla_policy *nla_pol;
|
||||
|
@ -2487,6 +2490,7 @@ static const struct xfrm_link {
|
|||
[XFRM_MSG_NEWPOLICY - XFRM_MSG_BASE] = { .doit = xfrm_add_policy },
|
||||
[XFRM_MSG_DELPOLICY - XFRM_MSG_BASE] = { .doit = xfrm_get_policy },
|
||||
[XFRM_MSG_GETPOLICY - XFRM_MSG_BASE] = { .doit = xfrm_get_policy,
|
||||
.start = xfrm_dump_policy_start,
|
||||
.dump = xfrm_dump_policy,
|
||||
.done = xfrm_dump_policy_done },
|
||||
[XFRM_MSG_ALLOCSPI - XFRM_MSG_BASE] = { .doit = xfrm_alloc_userspi },
|
||||
|
@ -2539,6 +2543,7 @@ static int xfrm_user_rcv_msg(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
|
|||
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct netlink_dump_control c = {
|
||||
.start = link->start,
|
||||
.dump = link->dump,
|
||||
.done = link->done,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue