[PATCH] spin_unlock_bh() and preempt_check_resched()
In _spin_unlock_bh(lock): do { \ _raw_spin_unlock(lock); \ preempt_enable(); \ local_bh_enable(); \ __release(lock); \ } while (0) there is no reason for using preempt_enable() instead of a simple preempt_enable_no_resched() Since we know bottom halves are disabled, preempt_schedule() will always return at once (preempt_count!=0), and hence preempt_check_resched() is useless here... This fixes it by using "preempt_enable_no_resched()" instead of the "preempt_enable()", and thus avoids the useless preempt_check_resched() just before re-enabling bottom halves. Signed-off-by: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
9636273dae
commit
10f02d1c59
|
@ -248,7 +248,7 @@ typedef struct {
|
|||
|
||||
#define _spin_trylock_bh(lock) ({preempt_disable(); local_bh_disable(); \
|
||||
_raw_spin_trylock(lock) ? \
|
||||
1 : ({preempt_enable(); local_bh_enable(); 0;});})
|
||||
1 : ({preempt_enable_no_resched(); local_bh_enable(); 0;});})
|
||||
|
||||
#define _spin_lock(lock) \
|
||||
do { \
|
||||
|
@ -383,7 +383,7 @@ do { \
|
|||
#define _spin_unlock_bh(lock) \
|
||||
do { \
|
||||
_raw_spin_unlock(lock); \
|
||||
preempt_enable(); \
|
||||
preempt_enable_no_resched(); \
|
||||
local_bh_enable(); \
|
||||
__release(lock); \
|
||||
} while (0)
|
||||
|
@ -391,7 +391,7 @@ do { \
|
|||
#define _write_unlock_bh(lock) \
|
||||
do { \
|
||||
_raw_write_unlock(lock); \
|
||||
preempt_enable(); \
|
||||
preempt_enable_no_resched(); \
|
||||
local_bh_enable(); \
|
||||
__release(lock); \
|
||||
} while (0)
|
||||
|
@ -423,8 +423,8 @@ do { \
|
|||
#define _read_unlock_bh(lock) \
|
||||
do { \
|
||||
_raw_read_unlock(lock); \
|
||||
preempt_enable_no_resched(); \
|
||||
local_bh_enable(); \
|
||||
preempt_enable(); \
|
||||
__release(lock); \
|
||||
} while (0)
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -294,7 +294,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(_spin_unlock_irq);
|
|||
void __lockfunc _spin_unlock_bh(spinlock_t *lock)
|
||||
{
|
||||
_raw_spin_unlock(lock);
|
||||
preempt_enable();
|
||||
preempt_enable_no_resched();
|
||||
local_bh_enable();
|
||||
}
|
||||
EXPORT_SYMBOL(_spin_unlock_bh);
|
||||
|
@ -318,7 +318,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(_read_unlock_irq);
|
|||
void __lockfunc _read_unlock_bh(rwlock_t *lock)
|
||||
{
|
||||
_raw_read_unlock(lock);
|
||||
preempt_enable();
|
||||
preempt_enable_no_resched();
|
||||
local_bh_enable();
|
||||
}
|
||||
EXPORT_SYMBOL(_read_unlock_bh);
|
||||
|
@ -342,7 +342,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(_write_unlock_irq);
|
|||
void __lockfunc _write_unlock_bh(rwlock_t *lock)
|
||||
{
|
||||
_raw_write_unlock(lock);
|
||||
preempt_enable();
|
||||
preempt_enable_no_resched();
|
||||
local_bh_enable();
|
||||
}
|
||||
EXPORT_SYMBOL(_write_unlock_bh);
|
||||
|
@ -354,7 +354,7 @@ int __lockfunc _spin_trylock_bh(spinlock_t *lock)
|
|||
if (_raw_spin_trylock(lock))
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
|
||||
preempt_enable();
|
||||
preempt_enable_no_resched();
|
||||
local_bh_enable();
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue