PM / OPP: fix warning in of_free_opp_table()
Not having OPP defined for a device is not a crime, we should not splat warning in this case. Also, it seems that we are ready to accept invalid dev (find_device_opp will return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL) then) so let's not crash in dev_name() in such case. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@chromium.org> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
b02ded246d
commit
0fe30da2cb
|
@ -799,9 +799,15 @@ void of_free_opp_table(struct device *dev)
|
|||
|
||||
/* Check for existing list for 'dev' */
|
||||
dev_opp = find_device_opp(dev);
|
||||
if (WARN(IS_ERR(dev_opp), "%s: dev_opp: %ld\n", dev_name(dev),
|
||||
PTR_ERR(dev_opp)))
|
||||
if (IS_ERR(dev_opp)) {
|
||||
int error = PTR_ERR(dev_opp);
|
||||
if (error != -ENODEV)
|
||||
WARN(1, "%s: dev_opp: %d\n",
|
||||
IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dev) ?
|
||||
"Invalid device" : dev_name(dev),
|
||||
error);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Hold our list modification lock here */
|
||||
mutex_lock(&dev_opp_list_lock);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue