ocfs2: Fix endian bug in o2dlm protocol negotiation.
struct dlm_query_join_packet is made up of four one-byte fields. They are effectively in big-endian order already. However, little-endian machines swap them before putting the packet on the wire (because query_join's response is a status, and that status is treated as a u32 on the wire). Thus, a big-endian and little-endian machines will treat this structure differently. The solution is to have little-endian machines swap the structure when converting from the structure to the u32 representation. Signed-off-by: Joel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh <mark.fasheh@oracle.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
2af37ce82d
commit
0f71b7b40f
|
@ -602,17 +602,19 @@ enum dlm_query_join_response_code {
|
|||
JOIN_PROTOCOL_MISMATCH,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
struct dlm_query_join_packet {
|
||||
u8 code; /* Response code. dlm_minor and fs_minor
|
||||
are only valid if this is JOIN_OK */
|
||||
u8 dlm_minor; /* The minor version of the protocol the
|
||||
dlm is speaking. */
|
||||
u8 fs_minor; /* The minor version of the protocol the
|
||||
filesystem is speaking. */
|
||||
u8 reserved;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
union dlm_query_join_response {
|
||||
u32 intval;
|
||||
struct {
|
||||
u8 code; /* Response code. dlm_minor and fs_minor
|
||||
are only valid if this is JOIN_OK */
|
||||
u8 dlm_minor; /* The minor version of the protocol the
|
||||
dlm is speaking. */
|
||||
u8 fs_minor; /* The minor version of the protocol the
|
||||
filesystem is speaking. */
|
||||
u8 reserved;
|
||||
} packet;
|
||||
struct dlm_query_join_packet packet;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
struct dlm_lock_request
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -713,14 +713,46 @@ static int dlm_query_join_proto_check(char *proto_type, int node,
|
|||
return rc;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* struct dlm_query_join_packet is made up of four one-byte fields. They
|
||||
* are effectively in big-endian order already. However, little-endian
|
||||
* machines swap them before putting the packet on the wire (because
|
||||
* query_join's response is a status, and that status is treated as a u32
|
||||
* on the wire). Thus, a big-endian and little-endian machines will treat
|
||||
* this structure differently.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* The solution is to have little-endian machines swap the structure when
|
||||
* converting from the structure to the u32 representation. This will
|
||||
* result in the structure having the correct format on the wire no matter
|
||||
* the host endian format.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static void dlm_query_join_packet_to_wire(struct dlm_query_join_packet *packet,
|
||||
u32 *wire)
|
||||
{
|
||||
union dlm_query_join_response response;
|
||||
|
||||
response.packet = *packet;
|
||||
*wire = cpu_to_be32(response.intval);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void dlm_query_join_wire_to_packet(u32 wire,
|
||||
struct dlm_query_join_packet *packet)
|
||||
{
|
||||
union dlm_query_join_response response;
|
||||
|
||||
response.intval = cpu_to_be32(wire);
|
||||
*packet = response.packet;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int dlm_query_join_handler(struct o2net_msg *msg, u32 len, void *data,
|
||||
void **ret_data)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct dlm_query_join_request *query;
|
||||
union dlm_query_join_response response = {
|
||||
.packet.code = JOIN_DISALLOW,
|
||||
struct dlm_query_join_packet packet = {
|
||||
.code = JOIN_DISALLOW,
|
||||
};
|
||||
struct dlm_ctxt *dlm = NULL;
|
||||
u32 response;
|
||||
u8 nodenum;
|
||||
|
||||
query = (struct dlm_query_join_request *) msg->buf;
|
||||
|
@ -737,11 +769,11 @@ static int dlm_query_join_handler(struct o2net_msg *msg, u32 len, void *data,
|
|||
mlog(0, "node %u is not in our live map yet\n",
|
||||
query->node_idx);
|
||||
|
||||
response.packet.code = JOIN_DISALLOW;
|
||||
packet.code = JOIN_DISALLOW;
|
||||
goto respond;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
response.packet.code = JOIN_OK_NO_MAP;
|
||||
packet.code = JOIN_OK_NO_MAP;
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock(&dlm_domain_lock);
|
||||
dlm = __dlm_lookup_domain_full(query->domain, query->name_len);
|
||||
|
@ -760,7 +792,7 @@ static int dlm_query_join_handler(struct o2net_msg *msg, u32 len, void *data,
|
|||
mlog(0, "disallow join as node %u does not "
|
||||
"have node %u in its nodemap\n",
|
||||
query->node_idx, nodenum);
|
||||
response.packet.code = JOIN_DISALLOW;
|
||||
packet.code = JOIN_DISALLOW;
|
||||
goto unlock_respond;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -780,23 +812,23 @@ static int dlm_query_join_handler(struct o2net_msg *msg, u32 len, void *data,
|
|||
/*If this is a brand new context and we
|
||||
* haven't started our join process yet, then
|
||||
* the other node won the race. */
|
||||
response.packet.code = JOIN_OK_NO_MAP;
|
||||
packet.code = JOIN_OK_NO_MAP;
|
||||
} else if (dlm->joining_node != DLM_LOCK_RES_OWNER_UNKNOWN) {
|
||||
/* Disallow parallel joins. */
|
||||
response.packet.code = JOIN_DISALLOW;
|
||||
packet.code = JOIN_DISALLOW;
|
||||
} else if (dlm->reco.state & DLM_RECO_STATE_ACTIVE) {
|
||||
mlog(0, "node %u trying to join, but recovery "
|
||||
"is ongoing.\n", bit);
|
||||
response.packet.code = JOIN_DISALLOW;
|
||||
packet.code = JOIN_DISALLOW;
|
||||
} else if (test_bit(bit, dlm->recovery_map)) {
|
||||
mlog(0, "node %u trying to join, but it "
|
||||
"still needs recovery.\n", bit);
|
||||
response.packet.code = JOIN_DISALLOW;
|
||||
packet.code = JOIN_DISALLOW;
|
||||
} else if (test_bit(bit, dlm->domain_map)) {
|
||||
mlog(0, "node %u trying to join, but it "
|
||||
"is still in the domain! needs recovery?\n",
|
||||
bit);
|
||||
response.packet.code = JOIN_DISALLOW;
|
||||
packet.code = JOIN_DISALLOW;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
/* Alright we're fully a part of this domain
|
||||
* so we keep some state as to who's joining
|
||||
|
@ -807,19 +839,15 @@ static int dlm_query_join_handler(struct o2net_msg *msg, u32 len, void *data,
|
|||
if (dlm_query_join_proto_check("DLM", bit,
|
||||
&dlm->dlm_locking_proto,
|
||||
&query->dlm_proto)) {
|
||||
response.packet.code =
|
||||
JOIN_PROTOCOL_MISMATCH;
|
||||
packet.code = JOIN_PROTOCOL_MISMATCH;
|
||||
} else if (dlm_query_join_proto_check("fs", bit,
|
||||
&dlm->fs_locking_proto,
|
||||
&query->fs_proto)) {
|
||||
response.packet.code =
|
||||
JOIN_PROTOCOL_MISMATCH;
|
||||
packet.code = JOIN_PROTOCOL_MISMATCH;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
response.packet.dlm_minor =
|
||||
query->dlm_proto.pv_minor;
|
||||
response.packet.fs_minor =
|
||||
query->fs_proto.pv_minor;
|
||||
response.packet.code = JOIN_OK;
|
||||
packet.dlm_minor = query->dlm_proto.pv_minor;
|
||||
packet.fs_minor = query->fs_proto.pv_minor;
|
||||
packet.code = JOIN_OK;
|
||||
__dlm_set_joining_node(dlm, query->node_idx);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -830,9 +858,10 @@ unlock_respond:
|
|||
spin_unlock(&dlm_domain_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
respond:
|
||||
mlog(0, "We respond with %u\n", response.packet.code);
|
||||
mlog(0, "We respond with %u\n", packet.code);
|
||||
|
||||
return response.intval;
|
||||
dlm_query_join_packet_to_wire(&packet, &response);
|
||||
return response;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int dlm_assert_joined_handler(struct o2net_msg *msg, u32 len, void *data,
|
||||
|
@ -968,7 +997,8 @@ static int dlm_request_join(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm,
|
|||
{
|
||||
int status;
|
||||
struct dlm_query_join_request join_msg;
|
||||
union dlm_query_join_response join_resp;
|
||||
struct dlm_query_join_packet packet;
|
||||
u32 join_resp;
|
||||
|
||||
mlog(0, "querying node %d\n", node);
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -984,11 +1014,12 @@ static int dlm_request_join(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm,
|
|||
|
||||
status = o2net_send_message(DLM_QUERY_JOIN_MSG, DLM_MOD_KEY, &join_msg,
|
||||
sizeof(join_msg), node,
|
||||
&join_resp.intval);
|
||||
&join_resp);
|
||||
if (status < 0 && status != -ENOPROTOOPT) {
|
||||
mlog_errno(status);
|
||||
goto bail;
|
||||
}
|
||||
dlm_query_join_wire_to_packet(join_resp, &packet);
|
||||
|
||||
/* -ENOPROTOOPT from the net code means the other side isn't
|
||||
listening for our message type -- that's fine, it means
|
||||
|
@ -997,10 +1028,10 @@ static int dlm_request_join(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm,
|
|||
if (status == -ENOPROTOOPT) {
|
||||
status = 0;
|
||||
*response = JOIN_OK_NO_MAP;
|
||||
} else if (join_resp.packet.code == JOIN_DISALLOW ||
|
||||
join_resp.packet.code == JOIN_OK_NO_MAP) {
|
||||
*response = join_resp.packet.code;
|
||||
} else if (join_resp.packet.code == JOIN_PROTOCOL_MISMATCH) {
|
||||
} else if (packet.code == JOIN_DISALLOW ||
|
||||
packet.code == JOIN_OK_NO_MAP) {
|
||||
*response = packet.code;
|
||||
} else if (packet.code == JOIN_PROTOCOL_MISMATCH) {
|
||||
mlog(ML_NOTICE,
|
||||
"This node requested DLM locking protocol %u.%u and "
|
||||
"filesystem locking protocol %u.%u. At least one of "
|
||||
|
@ -1012,14 +1043,12 @@ static int dlm_request_join(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm,
|
|||
dlm->fs_locking_proto.pv_minor,
|
||||
node);
|
||||
status = -EPROTO;
|
||||
*response = join_resp.packet.code;
|
||||
} else if (join_resp.packet.code == JOIN_OK) {
|
||||
*response = join_resp.packet.code;
|
||||
*response = packet.code;
|
||||
} else if (packet.code == JOIN_OK) {
|
||||
*response = packet.code;
|
||||
/* Use the same locking protocol as the remote node */
|
||||
dlm->dlm_locking_proto.pv_minor =
|
||||
join_resp.packet.dlm_minor;
|
||||
dlm->fs_locking_proto.pv_minor =
|
||||
join_resp.packet.fs_minor;
|
||||
dlm->dlm_locking_proto.pv_minor = packet.dlm_minor;
|
||||
dlm->fs_locking_proto.pv_minor = packet.fs_minor;
|
||||
mlog(0,
|
||||
"Node %d responds JOIN_OK with DLM locking protocol "
|
||||
"%u.%u and fs locking protocol %u.%u\n",
|
||||
|
@ -1031,11 +1060,11 @@ static int dlm_request_join(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm,
|
|||
} else {
|
||||
status = -EINVAL;
|
||||
mlog(ML_ERROR, "invalid response %d from node %u\n",
|
||||
join_resp.packet.code, node);
|
||||
packet.code, node);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
mlog(0, "status %d, node %d response is %d\n", status, node,
|
||||
*response);
|
||||
*response);
|
||||
|
||||
bail:
|
||||
return status;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue