gpio: tps65218: remove platform_set_drvdata() + cleanup probe

The platform_set_drvdata() call is only useful if we need to retrieve back
the private information.
Since the driver doesn't do that, it's not useful to have it.

If this is removed, we can also just do a direct return on
devm_gpiochip_add_data(). We don't need to print that this call failed as
there are other ways to log/see this during probe.

Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <aardelean@deviqon.com>
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
This commit is contained in:
Alexandru Ardelean 2021-05-15 10:54:44 +03:00 committed by Bartosz Golaszewski
parent 3660660a8e
commit 0cef30b8be
1 changed files with 2 additions and 11 deletions

View File

@ -187,7 +187,6 @@ static int tps65218_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct tps65218 *tps65218 = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent);
struct tps65218_gpio *tps65218_gpio;
int ret;
tps65218_gpio = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*tps65218_gpio),
GFP_KERNEL);
@ -201,16 +200,8 @@ static int tps65218_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
tps65218_gpio->gpio_chip.of_node = pdev->dev.of_node;
#endif
ret = devm_gpiochip_add_data(&pdev->dev, &tps65218_gpio->gpio_chip,
tps65218_gpio);
if (ret < 0) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to register gpiochip, %d\n", ret);
return ret;
}
platform_set_drvdata(pdev, tps65218_gpio);
return ret;
return devm_gpiochip_add_data(&pdev->dev, &tps65218_gpio->gpio_chip,
tps65218_gpio);
}
static const struct of_device_id tps65218_dt_match[] = {