[PATCH] broken inline asm on s390 (misuse of labels)

use of explicit labels in inline asm is a Bad Idea(tm), since gcc can
decide to inline the function in several places.  Fixed by use of 1f/f:
instead of .Lfitsin/.Lfitsin:

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
This commit is contained in:
Al Viro 2005-08-23 22:47:32 +01:00 committed by Linus Torvalds
parent a828b8e4e6
commit 0cbdff4f7f
1 changed files with 4 additions and 4 deletions

View File

@ -46,9 +46,9 @@ int __cpcmd(const char *cmd, char *response, int rlen, int *response_code)
"lra 3,0(%4)\n"
"lr 5,%5\n"
"diag 2,4,0x8\n"
"brc 8, .Litfits\n"
"brc 8, 1f\n"
"ar 5, %5\n"
".Litfits: \n"
"1: \n"
"lr %0,4\n"
"lr %1,5\n"
: "=d" (return_code), "=d" (return_len)
@ -64,9 +64,9 @@ int __cpcmd(const char *cmd, char *response, int rlen, int *response_code)
"sam31\n"
"diag 2,4,0x8\n"
"sam64\n"
"brc 8, .Litfits\n"
"brc 8, 1f\n"
"agr 5, %5\n"
".Litfits: \n"
"1: \n"
"lgr %0,4\n"
"lgr %1,5\n"
: "=d" (return_code), "=d" (return_len)