genirq: Move MASK_ON_SUSPEND handling into suspend_device_irqs()
There is no reason why we should delay the masking of interrupts whose interrupt chip requests MASK_ON_SUSPEND to the point where we check the wakeup interrupts. We can do it right at the point where we mark the interrupt as suspended. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
5417de2223
commit
092fadd59b
|
@ -56,6 +56,15 @@ static void suspend_device_irq(struct irq_desc *desc, int irq)
|
|||
|
||||
desc->istate |= IRQS_SUSPENDED;
|
||||
__disable_irq(desc, irq);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Hardware which has no wakeup source configuration facility
|
||||
* requires that the non wakeup interrupts are masked at the
|
||||
* chip level. The chip implementation indicates that with
|
||||
* IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (irq_desc_get_chip(desc)->flags & IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND)
|
||||
mask_irq(desc);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
|
@ -176,19 +185,7 @@ int check_wakeup_irqs(void)
|
|||
if (irqd_is_wakeup_set(&desc->irq_data)) {
|
||||
if (desc->depth == 1 && desc->istate & IRQS_PENDING)
|
||||
return -EBUSY;
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Check the non wakeup interrupts whether they need
|
||||
* to be masked before finally going into suspend
|
||||
* state. That's for hardware which has no wakeup
|
||||
* source configuration facility. The chip
|
||||
* implementation indicates that with
|
||||
* IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (desc->istate & IRQS_SUSPENDED &&
|
||||
irq_desc_get_chip(desc)->flags & IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND)
|
||||
mask_irq(desc);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue