mmc: change .get_ro() callback semantics

Now get_ro() callback must return 0/1 values for its logical states, and
negative errno values in case of error. If particular host instance doesn't
support RO/WP switch, it should return -ENOSYS.

This patch changes some hosts in two ways:

1. Now functions should be smart to not return negative values in
   "RO asserted" case (particularly gpio_ calls could return negative
   values for the outermost GPIOs).

   Also, board code usually passes get_ro() callbacks that directly return
   gpioreg & bit result, so at91_mci, imxmmc, pxamci and mmc_spi's get_ro()
   handlers need take special care when returning platform's values to the
   mmc core.

2. In case of host instance didn't implement get_ro() callback, it should
   really return -ENOSYS and let the mmc core decide what to do about it
   (mmc core thinks the same way as the hosts, so it isn't functional
   change).

Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>
Signed-off-by: Pierre Ossman <drzeus@drzeus.cx>
This commit is contained in:
Anton Vorontsov 2008-06-17 18:17:39 +04:00 committed by Pierre Ossman
parent 619ef4b421
commit 08f80bb519
7 changed files with 40 additions and 23 deletions

View File

@ -494,13 +494,13 @@ static int mmc_sd_init_card(struct mmc_host *host, u32 ocr,
* Check if read-only switch is active. * Check if read-only switch is active.
*/ */
if (!oldcard) { if (!oldcard) {
if (!host->ops->get_ro) { if (!host->ops->get_ro || host->ops->get_ro(host) < 0) {
printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: host does not " printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: host does not "
"support reading read-only " "support reading read-only "
"switch. assuming write-enable.\n", "switch. assuming write-enable.\n",
mmc_hostname(host)); mmc_hostname(host));
} else { } else {
if (host->ops->get_ro(host)) if (host->ops->get_ro(host) > 0)
mmc_card_set_readonly(card); mmc_card_set_readonly(card);
} }
} }

View File

@ -793,19 +793,15 @@ static irqreturn_t at91_mmc_det_irq(int irq, void *_host)
static int at91_mci_get_ro(struct mmc_host *mmc) static int at91_mci_get_ro(struct mmc_host *mmc)
{ {
int read_only = 0;
struct at91mci_host *host = mmc_priv(mmc); struct at91mci_host *host = mmc_priv(mmc);
if (host->board->wp_pin) { if (host->board->wp_pin)
read_only = gpio_get_value(host->board->wp_pin); return !!gpio_get_value(host->board->wp_pin);
printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: card is %s\n", mmc_hostname(mmc), /*
(read_only ? "read-only" : "read-write") ); * Board doesn't support read only detection; let the mmc core
} * decide what to do.
else { */
printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: host does not support reading read-only " return -ENOSYS;
"switch. Assuming write-enable.\n", mmc_hostname(mmc));
}
return read_only;
} }
static const struct mmc_host_ops at91_mci_ops = { static const struct mmc_host_ops at91_mci_ops = {

View File

@ -892,9 +892,12 @@ static int imxmci_get_ro(struct mmc_host *mmc)
struct imxmci_host *host = mmc_priv(mmc); struct imxmci_host *host = mmc_priv(mmc);
if (host->pdata && host->pdata->get_ro) if (host->pdata && host->pdata->get_ro)
return host->pdata->get_ro(mmc_dev(mmc)); return !!host->pdata->get_ro(mmc_dev(mmc));
/* Host doesn't support read only detection so assume writeable */ /*
return 0; * Board doesn't support read only detection; let the mmc core
* decide what to do.
*/
return -ENOSYS;
} }

View File

@ -1126,9 +1126,12 @@ static int mmc_spi_get_ro(struct mmc_host *mmc)
struct mmc_spi_host *host = mmc_priv(mmc); struct mmc_spi_host *host = mmc_priv(mmc);
if (host->pdata && host->pdata->get_ro) if (host->pdata && host->pdata->get_ro)
return host->pdata->get_ro(mmc->parent); return !!host->pdata->get_ro(mmc->parent);
/* board doesn't support read only detection; assume writeable */ /*
return 0; * Board doesn't support read only detection; let the mmc core
* decide what to do.
*/
return -ENOSYS;
} }
static int mmc_spi_get_cd(struct mmc_host *mmc) static int mmc_spi_get_cd(struct mmc_host *mmc)

View File

@ -374,9 +374,12 @@ static int pxamci_get_ro(struct mmc_host *mmc)
struct pxamci_host *host = mmc_priv(mmc); struct pxamci_host *host = mmc_priv(mmc);
if (host->pdata && host->pdata->get_ro) if (host->pdata && host->pdata->get_ro)
return host->pdata->get_ro(mmc_dev(mmc)); return !!host->pdata->get_ro(mmc_dev(mmc));
/* Host doesn't support read only detection so assume writeable */ /*
return 0; * Board doesn't support read only detection; let the mmc core
* decide what to do.
*/
return -ENOSYS;
} }
static void pxamci_set_ios(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_ios *ios) static void pxamci_set_ios(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_ios *ios)

View File

@ -939,7 +939,7 @@ static int wbsd_get_ro(struct mmc_host *mmc)
spin_unlock_bh(&host->lock); spin_unlock_bh(&host->lock);
return csr & WBSD_WRPT; return !!(csr & WBSD_WRPT);
} }
static const struct mmc_host_ops wbsd_ops = { static const struct mmc_host_ops wbsd_ops = {

View File

@ -58,6 +58,18 @@ struct mmc_host_ops {
* *
* Also note that these functions might sleep, so don't call them * Also note that these functions might sleep, so don't call them
* in the atomic contexts! * in the atomic contexts!
*
* Return values for the get_ro callback should be:
* 0 for a read/write card
* 1 for a read-only card
* -ENOSYS when not supported (equal to NULL callback)
* or a negative errno value when something bad happened
*
* Return values for the get_ro callback should be:
* 0 for a absent card
* 1 for a present card
* -ENOSYS when not supported (equal to NULL callback)
* or a negative errno value when something bad happened
*/ */
void (*set_ios)(struct mmc_host *host, struct mmc_ios *ios); void (*set_ios)(struct mmc_host *host, struct mmc_ios *ios);
int (*get_ro)(struct mmc_host *host); int (*get_ro)(struct mmc_host *host);