rcu: Don't set nesting depth negative in rcu_preempt_deferred_qs()
Now that RCU flavors have been consolidated, an RCU-preempt rcu_read_unlock() in an interrupt or softirq handler cannot possibly end the RCU read-side critical section. Consider the old vulnerability involving rcu_preempt_deferred_qs() being invoked within such a handler that interrupted an extended RCU read-side critical section, in which a wakeup might be invoked with a scheduler lock held. Because rcu_read_unlock_special() no longer does wakeups in such situations, it is no longer necessary for rcu_preempt_deferred_qs() to set the nesting level negative. This commit therefore removes this recursion-protection code from rcu_preempt_deferred_qs(). [ paulmck: Fix typo in commit log per Steve Rostedt. ] Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
e4453d8a1c
commit
07b4a930fc
|
@ -569,16 +569,11 @@ static bool rcu_preempt_need_deferred_qs(struct task_struct *t)
|
|||
static void rcu_preempt_deferred_qs(struct task_struct *t)
|
||||
{
|
||||
unsigned long flags;
|
||||
bool couldrecurse = rcu_preempt_depth() >= 0;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!rcu_preempt_need_deferred_qs(t))
|
||||
return;
|
||||
if (couldrecurse)
|
||||
rcu_preempt_depth_set(rcu_preempt_depth() - RCU_NEST_BIAS);
|
||||
local_irq_save(flags);
|
||||
rcu_preempt_deferred_qs_irqrestore(t, flags);
|
||||
if (couldrecurse)
|
||||
rcu_preempt_depth_set(rcu_preempt_depth() + RCU_NEST_BIAS);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue