ASoC: Fix memory allocation for snd_soc_dapm_switch names

snd_soc_dapm_switch ends up ends up in dapm_new_mixer() (since a switch
is a special case of a mixer with only one input) but this wasn't
correctly handled in the code.

Also fix the coding style for the switch below while we're here.

Reported-by: Joonyoung Shim <dofmind@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
This commit is contained in:
Mark Brown 2009-03-05 17:06:23 +00:00
parent b0c5033f02
commit 07495f3e5a
1 changed files with 3 additions and 4 deletions

View File

@ -332,7 +332,7 @@ static int dapm_new_mixer(struct snd_soc_codec *codec,
* kcontrol name.
*/
name_len = strlen(w->kcontrols[i].name) + 1;
if (w->id == snd_soc_dapm_mixer)
if (w->id != snd_soc_dapm_mixer_named_ctl)
name_len += 1 + strlen(w->name);
path->long_name = kmalloc(name_len, GFP_KERNEL);
@ -341,15 +341,14 @@ static int dapm_new_mixer(struct snd_soc_codec *codec,
return -ENOMEM;
switch (w->id) {
case snd_soc_dapm_mixer:
default:
snprintf(path->long_name, name_len, "%s %s",
w->name, w->kcontrols[i].name);
break;
break;
case snd_soc_dapm_mixer_named_ctl:
snprintf(path->long_name, name_len, "%s",
w->kcontrols[i].name);
break;
break;
}
path->long_name[name_len - 1] = '\0';