bonding: make slave status notifications GFP_ATOMIC

Currently we're using GFP_KERNEL, however there are some path(s) where we
can hold some spinlocks, specifically bond->curr_slave_lock:

[    4.722916] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/slub.c:965
[    4.724438] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 940, name: ifup-eth
[    4.726034] 5 locks held by ifup-eth/940:
...snip...
[    4.734646]  #4:  (&bond->curr_slave_lock){+...+.}, at: [<ffffffffa00badc6>] bond_enslave+0xda6/0xdd0 [bonding]
...snip...
[    4.759081]  [<ffffffffa00b6f11>] bond_change_active_slave+0x191/0x3b0 [bonding]
[    4.760917]  [<ffffffffa00b7227>] bond_select_active_slave+0xf7/0x1d0 [bonding]
[    4.762751]  [<ffffffffa00badce>] bond_enslave+0xdae/0xdd0 [bonding]
...snip...

As it's out of hot path and is a really rare event - change the gfp_t flags
to GFP_ATOMIC to avoid sleeping under spinlock.

v2: convert new notify calls to GFP_ATOMIC.

CC: Thomas Glanzmann <thomas@glanzmann.de>
CC: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@huawei.com>
CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>
Signed-off-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
Veaceslav Falico 2014-03-06 15:33:22 +01:00 committed by David S. Miller
parent e90c14835b
commit 072256d1f2
1 changed files with 4 additions and 4 deletions

View File

@ -293,7 +293,7 @@ static inline void bond_set_active_slave(struct slave *slave)
{
if (slave->backup) {
slave->backup = 0;
rtmsg_ifinfo(RTM_NEWLINK, slave->dev, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
rtmsg_ifinfo(RTM_NEWLINK, slave->dev, 0, GFP_ATOMIC);
}
}
@ -301,7 +301,7 @@ static inline void bond_set_backup_slave(struct slave *slave)
{
if (!slave->backup) {
slave->backup = 1;
rtmsg_ifinfo(RTM_NEWLINK, slave->dev, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
rtmsg_ifinfo(RTM_NEWLINK, slave->dev, 0, GFP_ATOMIC);
}
}
@ -313,7 +313,7 @@ static inline void bond_set_slave_state(struct slave *slave,
slave->backup = slave_state;
if (notify) {
rtmsg_ifinfo(RTM_NEWLINK, slave->dev, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
rtmsg_ifinfo(RTM_NEWLINK, slave->dev, 0, GFP_ATOMIC);
slave->should_notify = 0;
} else {
if (slave->should_notify)
@ -343,7 +343,7 @@ static inline void bond_slave_state_notify(struct bonding *bond)
bond_for_each_slave(bond, tmp, iter) {
if (tmp->should_notify) {
rtmsg_ifinfo(RTM_NEWLINK, tmp->dev, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
rtmsg_ifinfo(RTM_NEWLINK, tmp->dev, 0, GFP_ATOMIC);
tmp->should_notify = 0;
}
}