nfsd4: hash lockowners to simplify RELEASE_LOCKOWNER
Hash lockowners on just the owner string rather than on (owner, inode). This makes the owner-string lookup needed for RELEASE_LOCKOWNER simpler (currently it's doing at a linear search through the entire hash table!). That may come at the expense of making (owner, inode) lookups more expensive if a client reuses the same lockowner across multiple files. We might add a separate lookup for that. Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
c7e8472cf8
commit
06f1f864d4
|
@ -3746,15 +3746,6 @@ last_byte_offset(u64 start, u64 len)
|
|||
return end > start ? end - 1: NFS4_MAX_UINT64;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static inline unsigned int
|
||||
lock_ownerstr_hashval(struct inode *inode, u32 cl_id,
|
||||
struct xdr_netobj *ownername)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return (file_hashval(inode) + cl_id
|
||||
+ opaque_hashval(ownername->data, ownername->len))
|
||||
& LOCK_HASH_MASK;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static struct list_head lock_ownerstr_hashtbl[LOCK_HASH_SIZE];
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
@ -3824,7 +3815,7 @@ static struct nfs4_lockowner *
|
|||
find_lockowner_str(struct inode *inode, clientid_t *clid,
|
||||
struct xdr_netobj *owner)
|
||||
{
|
||||
unsigned int hashval = lock_ownerstr_hashval(inode, clid->cl_id, owner);
|
||||
unsigned int hashval = open_ownerstr_hashval(clid->cl_id, owner);
|
||||
struct nfs4_lockowner *lo;
|
||||
struct nfs4_stateowner *op;
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -3847,7 +3838,7 @@ static void hash_lockowner(struct nfs4_lockowner *lo, unsigned int strhashval, s
|
|||
* Called in nfsd4_lock - therefore, OPEN and OPEN_CONFIRM (if needed) has
|
||||
* occurred.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* strhashval = lock_ownerstr_hashval
|
||||
* strhashval = open_ownerstr_hashval
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
static struct nfs4_lockowner *
|
||||
|
@ -3922,7 +3913,7 @@ __be32 lookup_or_create_lock_state(struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate, struct n
|
|||
struct nfs4_ol_stateid, st_perstateowner);
|
||||
return nfs_ok;
|
||||
}
|
||||
strhashval = lock_ownerstr_hashval(fi->fi_inode, cl->cl_clientid.cl_id,
|
||||
strhashval = open_ownerstr_hashval(cl->cl_clientid.cl_id,
|
||||
&lock->v.new.owner);
|
||||
lo = alloc_init_lock_stateowner(strhashval, cl, ost, lock);
|
||||
if (lo == NULL)
|
||||
|
@ -4286,7 +4277,7 @@ nfsd4_release_lockowner(struct svc_rqst *rqstp,
|
|||
struct nfs4_ol_stateid *stp;
|
||||
struct xdr_netobj *owner = &rlockowner->rl_owner;
|
||||
struct list_head matches;
|
||||
int i;
|
||||
unsigned int hashval = open_ownerstr_hashval(clid->cl_id, owner);
|
||||
__be32 status;
|
||||
|
||||
dprintk("nfsd4_release_lockowner clientid: (%08x/%08x):\n",
|
||||
|
@ -4301,22 +4292,17 @@ nfsd4_release_lockowner(struct svc_rqst *rqstp,
|
|||
nfs4_lock_state();
|
||||
|
||||
status = nfserr_locks_held;
|
||||
/* XXX: we're doing a linear search through all the lockowners.
|
||||
* Yipes! For now we'll just hope clients aren't really using
|
||||
* release_lockowner much, but eventually we have to fix these
|
||||
* data structures. */
|
||||
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&matches);
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < LOCK_HASH_SIZE; i++) {
|
||||
list_for_each_entry(sop, &lock_ownerstr_hashtbl[i], so_strhash) {
|
||||
if (!same_owner_str(sop, owner, clid))
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
list_for_each_entry(stp, &sop->so_stateids,
|
||||
st_perstateowner) {
|
||||
lo = lockowner(sop);
|
||||
if (check_for_locks(stp->st_file, lo))
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
list_add(&lo->lo_list, &matches);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
list_for_each_entry(sop, &lock_ownerstr_hashtbl[hashval], so_strhash) {
|
||||
if (!same_owner_str(sop, owner, clid))
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
list_for_each_entry(stp, &sop->so_stateids,
|
||||
st_perstateowner) {
|
||||
lo = lockowner(sop);
|
||||
if (check_for_locks(stp->st_file, lo))
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
list_add(&lo->lo_list, &matches);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
/* Clients probably won't expect us to return with some (but not all)
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue