s390/lcs: don't use intparm for channel IO
lcs passes an intparm when calling ccw_device_*(), even though lcs_irq() later makes no use of this. To reduce the confusion, consistently pass 0 as intparm instead. Signed-off-by: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Sebastian Ott <sebott@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
4f6e01f3d6
commit
0506d5ba68
|
@ -504,7 +504,7 @@ lcs_clear_channel(struct lcs_channel *channel)
|
|||
LCS_DBF_TEXT(4,trace,"clearch");
|
||||
LCS_DBF_TEXT_(4, trace, "%s", dev_name(&channel->ccwdev->dev));
|
||||
spin_lock_irqsave(get_ccwdev_lock(channel->ccwdev), flags);
|
||||
rc = ccw_device_clear(channel->ccwdev, (addr_t) channel);
|
||||
rc = ccw_device_clear(channel->ccwdev, 0);
|
||||
spin_unlock_irqrestore(get_ccwdev_lock(channel->ccwdev), flags);
|
||||
if (rc) {
|
||||
LCS_DBF_TEXT_(4, trace, "ecsc%s",
|
||||
|
@ -532,7 +532,7 @@ lcs_stop_channel(struct lcs_channel *channel)
|
|||
LCS_DBF_TEXT_(4, trace, "%s", dev_name(&channel->ccwdev->dev));
|
||||
channel->state = LCS_CH_STATE_INIT;
|
||||
spin_lock_irqsave(get_ccwdev_lock(channel->ccwdev), flags);
|
||||
rc = ccw_device_halt(channel->ccwdev, (addr_t) channel);
|
||||
rc = ccw_device_halt(channel->ccwdev, 0);
|
||||
spin_unlock_irqrestore(get_ccwdev_lock(channel->ccwdev), flags);
|
||||
if (rc) {
|
||||
LCS_DBF_TEXT_(4, trace, "ehsc%s",
|
||||
|
@ -1427,7 +1427,7 @@ lcs_irq(struct ccw_device *cdev, unsigned long intparm, struct irb *irb)
|
|||
channel->state = LCS_CH_STATE_SUSPENDED;
|
||||
if (irb->scsw.cmd.fctl & SCSW_FCTL_HALT_FUNC) {
|
||||
if (irb->scsw.cmd.cc != 0) {
|
||||
ccw_device_halt(channel->ccwdev, (addr_t) channel);
|
||||
ccw_device_halt(channel->ccwdev, 0);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
/* The channel has been stopped by halt_IO. */
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue