Btrfs: remove misleading handling of missing device scrub

scrub_submit() claims that it can handle a bio with a NULL block device,
but this is misleading, as calling bio_add_page() on a bio with a NULL
->bi_bdev would've already crashed. Delete this, as we're about to
properly handle a missing block device.

Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
This commit is contained in:
Omar Sandoval 2015-06-19 11:52:48 -07:00 committed by Chris Mason
parent 293a8489f3
commit 03679ade86
1 changed files with 1 additions and 15 deletions

View File

@ -2096,21 +2096,7 @@ static void scrub_submit(struct scrub_ctx *sctx)
sbio = sctx->bios[sctx->curr];
sctx->curr = -1;
scrub_pending_bio_inc(sctx);
if (!sbio->bio->bi_bdev) {
/*
* this case should not happen. If btrfs_map_block() is
* wrong, it could happen for dev-replace operations on
* missing devices when no mirrors are available, but in
* this case it should already fail the mount.
* This case is handled correctly (but _very_ slowly).
*/
printk_ratelimited(KERN_WARNING
"BTRFS: scrub_submit(bio bdev == NULL) is unexpected!\n");
bio_endio(sbio->bio, -EIO);
} else {
btrfsic_submit_bio(READ, sbio->bio);
}
btrfsic_submit_bio(READ, sbio->bio);
}
static int scrub_add_page_to_rd_bio(struct scrub_ctx *sctx,