gpio: Fix return value mismatch of function gpiod_get_from_of_node()
In case the requested gpio property is not found in the device tree, some callers of gpiod_get_from_of_node() expect a return value of NULL, others expect -ENOENT. In particular devm_fwnode_get_index_gpiod_from_child() expects -ENOENT. Currently it gets a NULL, which breaks the loop that tries all gpio_suffixes. The result is that a gpio property is not found, even though it is there. This patch changes gpiod_get_from_of_node() to return -ENOENT instead of NULL when the requested gpio property is not found in the device tree. Additionally it modifies all calling functions to properly evaluate the return value. Another approach would be to leave the return value of gpiod_get_from_of_node() as is and fix the bug in devm_fwnode_get_index_gpiod_from_child(). Other callers would still need to be reworked. The effort would be the same as with the chosen solution. Signed-off-by: Georg Waibel <georg.waibel@sensor-technik.de> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
65d80db2ee
commit
025bf37725
|
@ -4244,8 +4244,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpiod_get_index);
|
|||
*
|
||||
* Returns:
|
||||
* On successful request the GPIO pin is configured in accordance with
|
||||
* provided @dflags. If the node does not have the requested GPIO
|
||||
* property, NULL is returned.
|
||||
* provided @dflags.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* In case of error an ERR_PTR() is returned.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
@ -4267,9 +4266,6 @@ struct gpio_desc *gpiod_get_from_of_node(struct device_node *node,
|
|||
index, &flags);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!desc || IS_ERR(desc)) {
|
||||
/* If it is not there, just return NULL */
|
||||
if (PTR_ERR(desc) == -ENOENT)
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
return desc;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -289,6 +289,8 @@ static struct da9211_pdata *da9211_parse_regulators_dt(
|
|||
0,
|
||||
GPIOD_OUT_HIGH | GPIOD_FLAGS_BIT_NONEXCLUSIVE,
|
||||
"da9211-enable");
|
||||
if (IS_ERR(pdata->gpiod_ren[n]))
|
||||
pdata->gpiod_ren[n] = NULL;
|
||||
n++;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -843,7 +843,9 @@ static void s2mps14_pmic_dt_parse_ext_control_gpio(struct platform_device *pdev,
|
|||
0,
|
||||
GPIOD_OUT_HIGH | GPIOD_FLAGS_BIT_NONEXCLUSIVE,
|
||||
"s2mps11-regulator");
|
||||
if (IS_ERR(gpio[reg])) {
|
||||
if (PTR_ERR(gpio[reg]) == -ENOENT)
|
||||
gpio[reg] = NULL;
|
||||
else if (IS_ERR(gpio[reg])) {
|
||||
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to get control GPIO for %d/%s\n",
|
||||
reg, rdata[reg].name);
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -574,7 +574,9 @@ static int s5m8767_pmic_dt_parse_pdata(struct platform_device *pdev,
|
|||
0,
|
||||
GPIOD_OUT_HIGH | GPIOD_FLAGS_BIT_NONEXCLUSIVE,
|
||||
"s5m8767");
|
||||
if (IS_ERR(rdata->ext_control_gpiod))
|
||||
if (PTR_ERR(rdata->ext_control_gpiod) == -ENOENT)
|
||||
rdata->ext_control_gpiod = NULL;
|
||||
else if (IS_ERR(rdata->ext_control_gpiod))
|
||||
return PTR_ERR(rdata->ext_control_gpiod);
|
||||
|
||||
rdata->id = i;
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -371,11 +371,12 @@ static struct tps65090_platform_data *tps65090_parse_dt_reg_data(
|
|||
"dcdc-ext-control-gpios", 0,
|
||||
gflags,
|
||||
"tps65090");
|
||||
if (IS_ERR(rpdata->gpiod))
|
||||
return ERR_CAST(rpdata->gpiod);
|
||||
if (!rpdata->gpiod)
|
||||
if (PTR_ERR(rpdata->gpiod) == -ENOENT) {
|
||||
dev_err(&pdev->dev,
|
||||
"could not find DCDC external control GPIO\n");
|
||||
rpdata->gpiod = NULL;
|
||||
} else if (IS_ERR(rpdata->gpiod))
|
||||
return ERR_CAST(rpdata->gpiod);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (of_property_read_u32(tps65090_matches[idx].of_node,
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue