locking/rwsem: Always release wait_lock before waking up tasks
With the use of wake_q, we can do task wakeups without holding the wait_lock. There is one exception in the rwsem code, though. It is when the writer in the slowpath detects that there are waiters ahead but the rwsem is not held by a writer. This can lead to a long wait_lock hold time especially when a large number of readers are to be woken up. Remediate this situation by releasing the wait_lock before waking up tasks and re-acquiring it afterward. The rwsem_try_write_lock() function is also modified to read the rwsem count directly to avoid stale count value. Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: huang ying <huang.ying.caritas@gmail.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190520205918.22251-9-longman@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
4f23dbc1e6
commit
00f3c5a3df
|
@ -51,6 +51,11 @@ static inline void wake_q_init(struct wake_q_head *head)
|
|||
head->lastp = &head->first;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static inline bool wake_q_empty(struct wake_q_head *head)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return head->first == WAKE_Q_TAIL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
extern void wake_q_add(struct wake_q_head *head, struct task_struct *task);
|
||||
extern void wake_q_add_safe(struct wake_q_head *head, struct task_struct *task);
|
||||
extern void wake_up_q(struct wake_q_head *head);
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -400,13 +400,14 @@ static void rwsem_mark_wake(struct rw_semaphore *sem,
|
|||
* If wstate is WRITER_HANDOFF, it will make sure that either the handoff
|
||||
* bit is set or the lock is acquired with handoff bit cleared.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static inline bool rwsem_try_write_lock(long count, struct rw_semaphore *sem,
|
||||
static inline bool rwsem_try_write_lock(struct rw_semaphore *sem,
|
||||
enum writer_wait_state wstate)
|
||||
{
|
||||
long new;
|
||||
long count, new;
|
||||
|
||||
lockdep_assert_held(&sem->wait_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
count = atomic_long_read(&sem->count);
|
||||
do {
|
||||
bool has_handoff = !!(count & RWSEM_FLAG_HANDOFF);
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -751,26 +752,25 @@ rwsem_down_write_slowpath(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int state)
|
|||
? RWSEM_WAKE_READERS
|
||||
: RWSEM_WAKE_ANY, &wake_q);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!wake_q_empty(&wake_q)) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* The wakeup is normally called _after_ the wait_lock
|
||||
* is released, but given that we are proactively waking
|
||||
* readers we can deal with the wake_q overhead as it is
|
||||
* similar to releasing and taking the wait_lock again
|
||||
* for attempting rwsem_try_write_lock().
|
||||
* We want to minimize wait_lock hold time especially
|
||||
* when a large number of readers are to be woken up.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
|
||||
wake_up_q(&wake_q);
|
||||
|
||||
/* We need wake_q again below, reinitialize */
|
||||
wake_q_init(&wake_q);
|
||||
wake_q_init(&wake_q); /* Used again, reinit */
|
||||
raw_spin_lock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
count = atomic_long_add_return(RWSEM_FLAG_WAITERS, &sem->count);
|
||||
atomic_long_or(RWSEM_FLAG_WAITERS, &sem->count);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
wait:
|
||||
/* wait until we successfully acquire the lock */
|
||||
set_current_state(state);
|
||||
while (true) {
|
||||
if (rwsem_try_write_lock(count, sem, wstate))
|
||||
if (rwsem_try_write_lock(sem, wstate))
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
|
||||
|
@ -811,7 +811,6 @@ wait:
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
raw_spin_lock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
|
||||
count = atomic_long_read(&sem->count);
|
||||
}
|
||||
__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
|
||||
list_del(&waiter.list);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue