hollalinux
/
linux-sg2042
mirror of https://github.com/sophgo/linux-riscv.git
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

locking/rwsem: Always release wait_lock before waking up tasks 

With the use of wake_q, we can do task wakeups without holding the
wait_lock. There is one exception in the rwsem code, though. It is
when the writer in the slowpath detects that there are waiters ahead
but the rwsem is not held by a writer. This can lead to a long wait_lock
hold time especially when a large number of readers are to be woken up.

Remediate this situation by releasing the wait_lock before waking
up tasks and re-acquiring it afterward. The rwsem_try_write_lock()
function is also modified to read the rwsem count directly to avoid
stale count value.

Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: huang ying <huang.ying.caritas@gmail.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190520205918.22251-9-longman@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Waiman Long 2019-05-20 16:59:07 -04:00 committed by Ingo Molnar
parent 4f23dbc1e6
commit 00f3c5a3df
2 changed files with 20 additions and 16 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

5
include/linux/sched/wake_q.h
View File

@ -51,6 +51,11 @@ static inline void wake_q_init(struct wake_q_head *head)
head->lastp = &head->first;
}
static inline bool wake_q_empty(struct wake_q_head *head)
{
return head->first == WAKE_Q_TAIL;
}
extern void wake_q_add(struct wake_q_head *head, struct task_struct *task);
extern void wake_q_add_safe(struct wake_q_head *head, struct task_struct *task);
extern void wake_up_q(struct wake_q_head *head);

31
kernel/locking/rwsem.c
View File

@ -400,13 +400,14 @@ static void rwsem_mark_wake(struct rw_semaphore *sem,
* If wstate is WRITER_HANDOFF, it will make sure that either the handoff
* bit is set or the lock is acquired with handoff bit cleared.
*/
static inline bool rwsem_try_write_lock(long count, struct rw_semaphore *sem,
static inline bool rwsem_try_write_lock(struct rw_semaphore *sem,
enum writer_wait_state wstate)
{
long new;
long count, new;
lockdep_assert_held(&sem->wait_lock);
count = atomic_long_read(&sem->count);
do {
bool has_handoff = !!(count & RWSEM_FLAG_HANDOFF);
@ -751,26 +752,25 @@ rwsem_down_write_slowpath(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int state)
? RWSEM_WAKE_READERS
: RWSEM_WAKE_ANY, &wake_q);
/*
* The wakeup is normally called _after_ the wait_lock
* is released, but given that we are proactively waking
* readers we can deal with the wake_q overhead as it is
* similar to releasing and taking the wait_lock again
* for attempting rwsem_try_write_lock().
*/
wake_up_q(&wake_q);
/* We need wake_q again below, reinitialize */
wake_q_init(&wake_q);
if (!wake_q_empty(&wake_q)) {
/*
* We want to minimize wait_lock hold time especially
* when a large number of readers are to be woken up.
*/
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
wake_up_q(&wake_q);
wake_q_init(&wake_q); /* Used again, reinit */
raw_spin_lock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
}
} else {
count = atomic_long_add_return(RWSEM_FLAG_WAITERS, &sem->count);
atomic_long_or(RWSEM_FLAG_WAITERS, &sem->count);
}
wait:
/* wait until we successfully acquire the lock */
set_current_state(state);
while (true) {
if (rwsem_try_write_lock(count, sem, wstate))
if (rwsem_try_write_lock(sem, wstate))
break;
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
@ -811,7 +811,6 @@ wait:
}
raw_spin_lock_irq(&sem->wait_lock);
count = atomic_long_read(&sem->count);
}
__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
list_del(&waiter.list);