virtiofs: Fix old-style declaration

There expect the 'static' keyword to come first in a declaration, and we
get warnings like this with "make W=1":

fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c:687:1: warning: 'static' is not at beginning of declaration [-Wold-style-declaration]
fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c:692:1: warning: 'static' is not at beginning of declaration [-Wold-style-declaration]
fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c:1029:1: warning: 'static' is not at beginning of declaration [-Wold-style-declaration]

Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
YueHaibing 2019-11-11 20:23:59 +08:00 committed by Miklos Szeredi
parent c634da718d
commit 00929447f5
1 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions

View File

@ -684,12 +684,12 @@ static int virtio_fs_restore(struct virtio_device *vdev)
}
#endif /* CONFIG_PM_SLEEP */
const static struct virtio_device_id id_table[] = {
static const struct virtio_device_id id_table[] = {
{ VIRTIO_ID_FS, VIRTIO_DEV_ANY_ID },
{},
};
const static unsigned int feature_table[] = {};
static const unsigned int feature_table[] = {};
static struct virtio_driver virtio_fs_driver = {
.driver.name = KBUILD_MODNAME,
@ -1026,7 +1026,7 @@ __releases(fiq->lock)
}
}
const static struct fuse_iqueue_ops virtio_fs_fiq_ops = {
static const struct fuse_iqueue_ops virtio_fs_fiq_ops = {
.wake_forget_and_unlock = virtio_fs_wake_forget_and_unlock,
.wake_interrupt_and_unlock = virtio_fs_wake_interrupt_and_unlock,
.wake_pending_and_unlock = virtio_fs_wake_pending_and_unlock,