linux-sg2042/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c

2285 lines
59 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/*
* Copyright © 2003 Rick Bronson
*
* Derived from drivers/mtd/nand/autcpu12.c
* Copyright © 2001 Thomas Gleixner (gleixner@autronix.de)
*
* Derived from drivers/mtd/spia.c
* Copyright © 2000 Steven J. Hill (sjhill@cotw.com)
*
*
* Add Hardware ECC support for AT91SAM9260 / AT91SAM9263
* Richard Genoud (richard.genoud@gmail.com), Adeneo Copyright © 2007
*
* Derived from Das U-Boot source code
* (u-boot-1.1.5/board/atmel/at91sam9263ek/nand.c)
* © Copyright 2006 ATMEL Rousset, Lacressonniere Nicolas
*
* Add Programmable Multibit ECC support for various AT91 SoC
* © Copyright 2012 ATMEL, Hong Xu
*
mtd: atmel_nand: add Nand Flash Controller (NFC) support Nand Flash Controller (NFC) can handle automatic transfers, sending the commands and address cycles to the NAND Flash. To use NFC in this driver, user needs to add NFC child node in nand flash driver. The NFC child node includes NFC's compatible string and regiters of the address and size of NFC command registers, NFC registers (embedded in HSMC) and NFC SRAM. Also user need to set up the HSMC irq, which use to check whether nfc command is finish or not. This driver has been tested on SAMA5D3X-EK board with JFFS2, YAFFS, UBIFS and mtd-utils. I put the part of the mtd_speedtest result here for your information. >From the mtd_speedtest, we can see the NFC will reduce the %50 of cpu load when writing nand flash. No change when reading. In the meantime, the speed will be slow about %8. - commands use to test: #insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 & #top -n 30 -d 1 | grep speedtest - test result: Before the patch: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 515 495 root R 1164 0% 93% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 99% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock write speed is 5768 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 92% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 5932 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page write speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page write speed is 5770 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 89% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 5910 KiB/s After the patch: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock write speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 49% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 50% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 47% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock write speed is 5370 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 92% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 95% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 5715 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page write speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 48% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 47% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 50% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page write speed is 5224 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 89% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 93% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 5641 KiB/s Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2013-08-05 19:14:35 +08:00
* Add Nand Flash Controller support for SAMA5 SoC
* © Copyright 2013 ATMEL, Josh Wu (josh.wu@atmel.com)
*
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
* it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
* published by the Free Software Foundation.
*
*/
#include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/moduleparam.h>
#include <linux/platform_device.h>
#include <linux/of.h>
#include <linux/of_device.h>
#include <linux/of_gpio.h>
#include <linux/of_mtd.h>
#include <linux/mtd/mtd.h>
#include <linux/mtd/nand.h>
#include <linux/mtd/partitions.h>
mtd: atmel_nand: add Nand Flash Controller (NFC) support Nand Flash Controller (NFC) can handle automatic transfers, sending the commands and address cycles to the NAND Flash. To use NFC in this driver, user needs to add NFC child node in nand flash driver. The NFC child node includes NFC's compatible string and regiters of the address and size of NFC command registers, NFC registers (embedded in HSMC) and NFC SRAM. Also user need to set up the HSMC irq, which use to check whether nfc command is finish or not. This driver has been tested on SAMA5D3X-EK board with JFFS2, YAFFS, UBIFS and mtd-utils. I put the part of the mtd_speedtest result here for your information. >From the mtd_speedtest, we can see the NFC will reduce the %50 of cpu load when writing nand flash. No change when reading. In the meantime, the speed will be slow about %8. - commands use to test: #insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 & #top -n 30 -d 1 | grep speedtest - test result: Before the patch: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 515 495 root R 1164 0% 93% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 99% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock write speed is 5768 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 92% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 5932 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page write speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page write speed is 5770 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 89% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 5910 KiB/s After the patch: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock write speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 49% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 50% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 47% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock write speed is 5370 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 92% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 95% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 5715 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page write speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 48% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 47% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 50% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page write speed is 5224 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 89% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 93% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 5641 KiB/s Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2013-08-05 19:14:35 +08:00
#include <linux/delay.h>
#include <linux/dmaengine.h>
#include <linux/gpio.h>
mtd: atmel_nand: add Nand Flash Controller (NFC) support Nand Flash Controller (NFC) can handle automatic transfers, sending the commands and address cycles to the NAND Flash. To use NFC in this driver, user needs to add NFC child node in nand flash driver. The NFC child node includes NFC's compatible string and regiters of the address and size of NFC command registers, NFC registers (embedded in HSMC) and NFC SRAM. Also user need to set up the HSMC irq, which use to check whether nfc command is finish or not. This driver has been tested on SAMA5D3X-EK board with JFFS2, YAFFS, UBIFS and mtd-utils. I put the part of the mtd_speedtest result here for your information. >From the mtd_speedtest, we can see the NFC will reduce the %50 of cpu load when writing nand flash. No change when reading. In the meantime, the speed will be slow about %8. - commands use to test: #insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 & #top -n 30 -d 1 | grep speedtest - test result: Before the patch: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 515 495 root R 1164 0% 93% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 99% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock write speed is 5768 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 92% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 5932 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page write speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page write speed is 5770 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 89% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 5910 KiB/s After the patch: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock write speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 49% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 50% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 47% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock write speed is 5370 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 92% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 95% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 5715 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page write speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 48% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 47% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 50% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page write speed is 5224 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 89% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 93% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 5641 KiB/s Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2013-08-05 19:14:35 +08:00
#include <linux/interrupt.h>
#include <linux/io.h>
#include <linux/platform_data/atmel.h>
static int use_dma = 1;
module_param(use_dma, int, 0);
static int on_flash_bbt = 0;
module_param(on_flash_bbt, int, 0);
/* Register access macros */
#define ecc_readl(add, reg) \
__raw_readl(add + ATMEL_ECC_##reg)
#define ecc_writel(add, reg, value) \
__raw_writel((value), add + ATMEL_ECC_##reg)
#include "atmel_nand_ecc.h" /* Hardware ECC registers */
mtd: atmel_nand: add Nand Flash Controller (NFC) support Nand Flash Controller (NFC) can handle automatic transfers, sending the commands and address cycles to the NAND Flash. To use NFC in this driver, user needs to add NFC child node in nand flash driver. The NFC child node includes NFC's compatible string and regiters of the address and size of NFC command registers, NFC registers (embedded in HSMC) and NFC SRAM. Also user need to set up the HSMC irq, which use to check whether nfc command is finish or not. This driver has been tested on SAMA5D3X-EK board with JFFS2, YAFFS, UBIFS and mtd-utils. I put the part of the mtd_speedtest result here for your information. >From the mtd_speedtest, we can see the NFC will reduce the %50 of cpu load when writing nand flash. No change when reading. In the meantime, the speed will be slow about %8. - commands use to test: #insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 & #top -n 30 -d 1 | grep speedtest - test result: Before the patch: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 515 495 root R 1164 0% 93% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 99% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock write speed is 5768 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 92% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 5932 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page write speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page write speed is 5770 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 89% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 5910 KiB/s After the patch: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock write speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 49% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 50% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 47% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock write speed is 5370 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 92% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 95% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 5715 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page write speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 48% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 47% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 50% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page write speed is 5224 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 89% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 93% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 5641 KiB/s Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2013-08-05 19:14:35 +08:00
#include "atmel_nand_nfc.h" /* Nand Flash Controller definition */
/* oob layout for large page size
* bad block info is on bytes 0 and 1
* the bytes have to be consecutives to avoid
* several NAND_CMD_RNDOUT during read
*/
static struct nand_ecclayout atmel_oobinfo_large = {
.eccbytes = 4,
.eccpos = {60, 61, 62, 63},
.oobfree = {
{2, 58}
},
};
/* oob layout for small page size
* bad block info is on bytes 4 and 5
* the bytes have to be consecutives to avoid
* several NAND_CMD_RNDOUT during read
*/
static struct nand_ecclayout atmel_oobinfo_small = {
.eccbytes = 4,
.eccpos = {0, 1, 2, 3},
.oobfree = {
{6, 10}
},
};
mtd: atmel_nand: add Nand Flash Controller (NFC) support Nand Flash Controller (NFC) can handle automatic transfers, sending the commands and address cycles to the NAND Flash. To use NFC in this driver, user needs to add NFC child node in nand flash driver. The NFC child node includes NFC's compatible string and regiters of the address and size of NFC command registers, NFC registers (embedded in HSMC) and NFC SRAM. Also user need to set up the HSMC irq, which use to check whether nfc command is finish or not. This driver has been tested on SAMA5D3X-EK board with JFFS2, YAFFS, UBIFS and mtd-utils. I put the part of the mtd_speedtest result here for your information. >From the mtd_speedtest, we can see the NFC will reduce the %50 of cpu load when writing nand flash. No change when reading. In the meantime, the speed will be slow about %8. - commands use to test: #insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 & #top -n 30 -d 1 | grep speedtest - test result: Before the patch: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 515 495 root R 1164 0% 93% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 99% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock write speed is 5768 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 92% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 5932 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page write speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page write speed is 5770 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 89% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 5910 KiB/s After the patch: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock write speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 49% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 50% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 47% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock write speed is 5370 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 92% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 95% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 5715 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page write speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 48% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 47% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 50% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page write speed is 5224 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 89% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 93% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 5641 KiB/s Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2013-08-05 19:14:35 +08:00
struct atmel_nfc {
void __iomem *base_cmd_regs;
void __iomem *hsmc_regs;
void __iomem *sram_bank0;
dma_addr_t sram_bank0_phys;
mtd: atmel_nand: enable Nand Flash Controller (NFC) read data via sram NFC has embedded sram which can use to transfer data. This patch enable reading nand flash via NFC SRAM. It will minimize the CPU overhead. This driver has been tested on SAMA5D3X-EK with JFFS2, YAFFS2, UBIFS and mtd-utils. Here puts the part of mtd_speedtest (read test) result as following: Compare with non-NFC mtd_speedtest result, reading will reduce %45 cpu load with increase %80 speed. - commands use to test: # insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 & # top -n 30 -d 1 | grep speedtest - test result: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 28% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 25% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 26% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 9403 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 31% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 57% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 53% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 71% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 9258 KiB/s Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com> Acked-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2013-08-05 19:14:36 +08:00
bool use_nfc_sram;
mtd: atmel_nand: enable Nand Flash Controller (NFC) write via sram This patch enable writing nand flash via NFC SRAM. It will minimize the CPU overhead. The SRAM write only support ECC_NONE and ECC_HW with PMECC. To enable this NFC write by SRAM feature, you can add a string in dts under NFC driver node. This driver has been tested on SAMA5D3X-EK with JFFS2, YAFFS2, UBIFS and mtd-utils. Here is part of mtd_speedtest (writing test) result, compare with non-NFC writing, it reduces %65 cpu load with loss %12 speed. - commands use to test: # insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 & # top -n 30 -d 1 | grep speedtest - test result: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock write speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 7% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 8% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 5% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock write speed is 5194 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page write speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 32% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 27% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 25% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 30% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page write speed is 5024 KiB/s Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com> Acked-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2013-08-05 19:14:37 +08:00
bool write_by_sram;
mtd: atmel_nand: add Nand Flash Controller (NFC) support Nand Flash Controller (NFC) can handle automatic transfers, sending the commands and address cycles to the NAND Flash. To use NFC in this driver, user needs to add NFC child node in nand flash driver. The NFC child node includes NFC's compatible string and regiters of the address and size of NFC command registers, NFC registers (embedded in HSMC) and NFC SRAM. Also user need to set up the HSMC irq, which use to check whether nfc command is finish or not. This driver has been tested on SAMA5D3X-EK board with JFFS2, YAFFS, UBIFS and mtd-utils. I put the part of the mtd_speedtest result here for your information. >From the mtd_speedtest, we can see the NFC will reduce the %50 of cpu load when writing nand flash. No change when reading. In the meantime, the speed will be slow about %8. - commands use to test: #insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 & #top -n 30 -d 1 | grep speedtest - test result: Before the patch: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 515 495 root R 1164 0% 93% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 99% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock write speed is 5768 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 92% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 5932 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page write speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page write speed is 5770 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 89% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 5910 KiB/s After the patch: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock write speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 49% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 50% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 47% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock write speed is 5370 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 92% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 95% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 5715 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page write speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 48% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 47% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 50% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page write speed is 5224 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 89% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 93% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 5641 KiB/s Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2013-08-05 19:14:35 +08:00
bool is_initialized;
struct completion comp_nfc;
mtd: atmel_nand: enable Nand Flash Controller (NFC) read data via sram NFC has embedded sram which can use to transfer data. This patch enable reading nand flash via NFC SRAM. It will minimize the CPU overhead. This driver has been tested on SAMA5D3X-EK with JFFS2, YAFFS2, UBIFS and mtd-utils. Here puts the part of mtd_speedtest (read test) result as following: Compare with non-NFC mtd_speedtest result, reading will reduce %45 cpu load with increase %80 speed. - commands use to test: # insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 & # top -n 30 -d 1 | grep speedtest - test result: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 28% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 25% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 26% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 9403 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 31% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 57% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 53% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 71% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 9258 KiB/s Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com> Acked-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2013-08-05 19:14:36 +08:00
/* Point to the sram bank which include readed data via NFC */
void __iomem *data_in_sram;
mtd: atmel_nand: enable Nand Flash Controller (NFC) write via sram This patch enable writing nand flash via NFC SRAM. It will minimize the CPU overhead. The SRAM write only support ECC_NONE and ECC_HW with PMECC. To enable this NFC write by SRAM feature, you can add a string in dts under NFC driver node. This driver has been tested on SAMA5D3X-EK with JFFS2, YAFFS2, UBIFS and mtd-utils. Here is part of mtd_speedtest (writing test) result, compare with non-NFC writing, it reduces %65 cpu load with loss %12 speed. - commands use to test: # insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 & # top -n 30 -d 1 | grep speedtest - test result: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock write speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 7% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 8% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 5% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock write speed is 5194 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page write speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 32% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 27% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 25% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 30% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page write speed is 5024 KiB/s Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com> Acked-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2013-08-05 19:14:37 +08:00
bool will_write_sram;
mtd: atmel_nand: add Nand Flash Controller (NFC) support Nand Flash Controller (NFC) can handle automatic transfers, sending the commands and address cycles to the NAND Flash. To use NFC in this driver, user needs to add NFC child node in nand flash driver. The NFC child node includes NFC's compatible string and regiters of the address and size of NFC command registers, NFC registers (embedded in HSMC) and NFC SRAM. Also user need to set up the HSMC irq, which use to check whether nfc command is finish or not. This driver has been tested on SAMA5D3X-EK board with JFFS2, YAFFS, UBIFS and mtd-utils. I put the part of the mtd_speedtest result here for your information. >From the mtd_speedtest, we can see the NFC will reduce the %50 of cpu load when writing nand flash. No change when reading. In the meantime, the speed will be slow about %8. - commands use to test: #insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 & #top -n 30 -d 1 | grep speedtest - test result: Before the patch: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 515 495 root R 1164 0% 93% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 99% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock write speed is 5768 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 92% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 5932 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page write speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page write speed is 5770 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 89% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 5910 KiB/s After the patch: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock write speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 49% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 50% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 47% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock write speed is 5370 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 92% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 95% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 5715 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page write speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 48% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 47% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 50% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page write speed is 5224 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 89% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 93% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 5641 KiB/s Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2013-08-05 19:14:35 +08:00
};
static struct atmel_nfc nand_nfc;
struct atmel_nand_host {
struct nand_chip nand_chip;
struct mtd_info mtd;
void __iomem *io_base;
dma_addr_t io_phys;
struct atmel_nand_data board;
struct device *dev;
void __iomem *ecc;
struct completion comp;
struct dma_chan *dma_chan;
mtd: atmel_nand: add Nand Flash Controller (NFC) support Nand Flash Controller (NFC) can handle automatic transfers, sending the commands and address cycles to the NAND Flash. To use NFC in this driver, user needs to add NFC child node in nand flash driver. The NFC child node includes NFC's compatible string and regiters of the address and size of NFC command registers, NFC registers (embedded in HSMC) and NFC SRAM. Also user need to set up the HSMC irq, which use to check whether nfc command is finish or not. This driver has been tested on SAMA5D3X-EK board with JFFS2, YAFFS, UBIFS and mtd-utils. I put the part of the mtd_speedtest result here for your information. >From the mtd_speedtest, we can see the NFC will reduce the %50 of cpu load when writing nand flash. No change when reading. In the meantime, the speed will be slow about %8. - commands use to test: #insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 & #top -n 30 -d 1 | grep speedtest - test result: Before the patch: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 515 495 root R 1164 0% 93% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 99% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock write speed is 5768 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 92% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 5932 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page write speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page write speed is 5770 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 89% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 5910 KiB/s After the patch: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock write speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 49% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 50% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 47% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock write speed is 5370 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 92% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 95% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 5715 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page write speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 48% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 47% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 50% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page write speed is 5224 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 89% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 93% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 5641 KiB/s Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2013-08-05 19:14:35 +08:00
struct atmel_nfc *nfc;
bool has_pmecc;
u8 pmecc_corr_cap;
u16 pmecc_sector_size;
u32 pmecc_lookup_table_offset;
u32 pmecc_lookup_table_offset_512;
u32 pmecc_lookup_table_offset_1024;
int pmecc_bytes_per_sector;
int pmecc_sector_number;
int pmecc_degree; /* Degree of remainders */
int pmecc_cw_len; /* Length of codeword */
void __iomem *pmerrloc_base;
void __iomem *pmecc_rom_base;
/* lookup table for alpha_to and index_of */
void __iomem *pmecc_alpha_to;
void __iomem *pmecc_index_of;
/* data for pmecc computation */
int16_t *pmecc_partial_syn;
int16_t *pmecc_si;
int16_t *pmecc_smu; /* Sigma table */
int16_t *pmecc_lmu; /* polynomal order */
int *pmecc_mu;
int *pmecc_dmu;
int *pmecc_delta;
};
static struct nand_ecclayout atmel_pmecc_oobinfo;
/*
* Enable NAND.
*/
static void atmel_nand_enable(struct atmel_nand_host *host)
{
if (gpio_is_valid(host->board.enable_pin))
gpio_set_value(host->board.enable_pin, 0);
}
/*
* Disable NAND.
*/
static void atmel_nand_disable(struct atmel_nand_host *host)
{
if (gpio_is_valid(host->board.enable_pin))
gpio_set_value(host->board.enable_pin, 1);
}
/*
* Hardware specific access to control-lines
*/
static void atmel_nand_cmd_ctrl(struct mtd_info *mtd, int cmd, unsigned int ctrl)
{
struct nand_chip *nand_chip = mtd->priv;
struct atmel_nand_host *host = nand_chip->priv;
if (ctrl & NAND_CTRL_CHANGE) {
if (ctrl & NAND_NCE)
atmel_nand_enable(host);
else
atmel_nand_disable(host);
}
if (cmd == NAND_CMD_NONE)
return;
if (ctrl & NAND_CLE)
writeb(cmd, host->io_base + (1 << host->board.cle));
else
writeb(cmd, host->io_base + (1 << host->board.ale));
}
/*
* Read the Device Ready pin.
*/
static int atmel_nand_device_ready(struct mtd_info *mtd)
{
struct nand_chip *nand_chip = mtd->priv;
struct atmel_nand_host *host = nand_chip->priv;
return gpio_get_value(host->board.rdy_pin) ^
!!host->board.rdy_pin_active_low;
}
mtd: atmel_nand: add Nand Flash Controller (NFC) support Nand Flash Controller (NFC) can handle automatic transfers, sending the commands and address cycles to the NAND Flash. To use NFC in this driver, user needs to add NFC child node in nand flash driver. The NFC child node includes NFC's compatible string and regiters of the address and size of NFC command registers, NFC registers (embedded in HSMC) and NFC SRAM. Also user need to set up the HSMC irq, which use to check whether nfc command is finish or not. This driver has been tested on SAMA5D3X-EK board with JFFS2, YAFFS, UBIFS and mtd-utils. I put the part of the mtd_speedtest result here for your information. >From the mtd_speedtest, we can see the NFC will reduce the %50 of cpu load when writing nand flash. No change when reading. In the meantime, the speed will be slow about %8. - commands use to test: #insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 & #top -n 30 -d 1 | grep speedtest - test result: Before the patch: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 515 495 root R 1164 0% 93% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 99% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock write speed is 5768 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 92% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 5932 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page write speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page write speed is 5770 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 89% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 5910 KiB/s After the patch: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock write speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 49% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 50% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 47% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock write speed is 5370 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 92% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 95% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 5715 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page write speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 48% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 47% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 50% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page write speed is 5224 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 89% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 93% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 5641 KiB/s Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2013-08-05 19:14:35 +08:00
/* Set up for hardware ready pin and enable pin. */
static int atmel_nand_set_enable_ready_pins(struct mtd_info *mtd)
{
struct nand_chip *chip = mtd->priv;
struct atmel_nand_host *host = chip->priv;
int res = 0;
if (gpio_is_valid(host->board.rdy_pin)) {
res = devm_gpio_request(host->dev,
host->board.rdy_pin, "nand_rdy");
if (res < 0) {
dev_err(host->dev,
"can't request rdy gpio %d\n",
host->board.rdy_pin);
return res;
}
res = gpio_direction_input(host->board.rdy_pin);
if (res < 0) {
dev_err(host->dev,
"can't request input direction rdy gpio %d\n",
host->board.rdy_pin);
return res;
}
chip->dev_ready = atmel_nand_device_ready;
}
if (gpio_is_valid(host->board.enable_pin)) {
res = devm_gpio_request(host->dev,
host->board.enable_pin, "nand_enable");
if (res < 0) {
dev_err(host->dev,
"can't request enable gpio %d\n",
host->board.enable_pin);
return res;
}
res = gpio_direction_output(host->board.enable_pin, 1);
if (res < 0) {
dev_err(host->dev,
"can't request output direction enable gpio %d\n",
host->board.enable_pin);
return res;
}
}
return res;
}
mtd: atmel_nand: enable Nand Flash Controller (NFC) read data via sram NFC has embedded sram which can use to transfer data. This patch enable reading nand flash via NFC SRAM. It will minimize the CPU overhead. This driver has been tested on SAMA5D3X-EK with JFFS2, YAFFS2, UBIFS and mtd-utils. Here puts the part of mtd_speedtest (read test) result as following: Compare with non-NFC mtd_speedtest result, reading will reduce %45 cpu load with increase %80 speed. - commands use to test: # insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 & # top -n 30 -d 1 | grep speedtest - test result: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 28% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 25% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 26% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 9403 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 31% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 57% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 53% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 71% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 9258 KiB/s Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com> Acked-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2013-08-05 19:14:36 +08:00
static void memcpy32_fromio(void *trg, const void __iomem *src, size_t size)
{
int i;
u32 *t = trg;
const __iomem u32 *s = src;
for (i = 0; i < (size >> 2); i++)
*t++ = readl_relaxed(s++);
}
mtd: atmel_nand: enable Nand Flash Controller (NFC) write via sram This patch enable writing nand flash via NFC SRAM. It will minimize the CPU overhead. The SRAM write only support ECC_NONE and ECC_HW with PMECC. To enable this NFC write by SRAM feature, you can add a string in dts under NFC driver node. This driver has been tested on SAMA5D3X-EK with JFFS2, YAFFS2, UBIFS and mtd-utils. Here is part of mtd_speedtest (writing test) result, compare with non-NFC writing, it reduces %65 cpu load with loss %12 speed. - commands use to test: # insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 & # top -n 30 -d 1 | grep speedtest - test result: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock write speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 7% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 8% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 5% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock write speed is 5194 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page write speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 32% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 27% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 25% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 30% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page write speed is 5024 KiB/s Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com> Acked-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2013-08-05 19:14:37 +08:00
static void memcpy32_toio(void __iomem *trg, const void *src, int size)
{
int i;
u32 __iomem *t = trg;
const u32 *s = src;
for (i = 0; i < (size >> 2); i++)
writel_relaxed(*s++, t++);
}
/*
* Minimal-overhead PIO for data access.
*/
static void atmel_read_buf8(struct mtd_info *mtd, u8 *buf, int len)
{
struct nand_chip *nand_chip = mtd->priv;
mtd: atmel_nand: enable Nand Flash Controller (NFC) read data via sram NFC has embedded sram which can use to transfer data. This patch enable reading nand flash via NFC SRAM. It will minimize the CPU overhead. This driver has been tested on SAMA5D3X-EK with JFFS2, YAFFS2, UBIFS and mtd-utils. Here puts the part of mtd_speedtest (read test) result as following: Compare with non-NFC mtd_speedtest result, reading will reduce %45 cpu load with increase %80 speed. - commands use to test: # insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 & # top -n 30 -d 1 | grep speedtest - test result: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 28% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 25% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 26% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 9403 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 31% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 57% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 53% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 71% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 9258 KiB/s Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com> Acked-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2013-08-05 19:14:36 +08:00
struct atmel_nand_host *host = nand_chip->priv;
mtd: atmel_nand: enable Nand Flash Controller (NFC) read data via sram NFC has embedded sram which can use to transfer data. This patch enable reading nand flash via NFC SRAM. It will minimize the CPU overhead. This driver has been tested on SAMA5D3X-EK with JFFS2, YAFFS2, UBIFS and mtd-utils. Here puts the part of mtd_speedtest (read test) result as following: Compare with non-NFC mtd_speedtest result, reading will reduce %45 cpu load with increase %80 speed. - commands use to test: # insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 & # top -n 30 -d 1 | grep speedtest - test result: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 28% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 25% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 26% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 9403 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 31% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 57% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 53% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 71% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 9258 KiB/s Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com> Acked-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2013-08-05 19:14:36 +08:00
if (host->nfc && host->nfc->use_nfc_sram && host->nfc->data_in_sram) {
memcpy32_fromio(buf, host->nfc->data_in_sram, len);
host->nfc->data_in_sram += len;
} else {
__raw_readsb(nand_chip->IO_ADDR_R, buf, len);
}
}
static void atmel_read_buf16(struct mtd_info *mtd, u8 *buf, int len)
{
struct nand_chip *nand_chip = mtd->priv;
mtd: atmel_nand: enable Nand Flash Controller (NFC) read data via sram NFC has embedded sram which can use to transfer data. This patch enable reading nand flash via NFC SRAM. It will minimize the CPU overhead. This driver has been tested on SAMA5D3X-EK with JFFS2, YAFFS2, UBIFS and mtd-utils. Here puts the part of mtd_speedtest (read test) result as following: Compare with non-NFC mtd_speedtest result, reading will reduce %45 cpu load with increase %80 speed. - commands use to test: # insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 & # top -n 30 -d 1 | grep speedtest - test result: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 28% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 25% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 26% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 9403 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 31% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 57% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 53% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 71% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 9258 KiB/s Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com> Acked-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2013-08-05 19:14:36 +08:00
struct atmel_nand_host *host = nand_chip->priv;
mtd: atmel_nand: enable Nand Flash Controller (NFC) read data via sram NFC has embedded sram which can use to transfer data. This patch enable reading nand flash via NFC SRAM. It will minimize the CPU overhead. This driver has been tested on SAMA5D3X-EK with JFFS2, YAFFS2, UBIFS and mtd-utils. Here puts the part of mtd_speedtest (read test) result as following: Compare with non-NFC mtd_speedtest result, reading will reduce %45 cpu load with increase %80 speed. - commands use to test: # insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 & # top -n 30 -d 1 | grep speedtest - test result: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 28% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 25% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 26% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 9403 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 31% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 57% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 53% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 71% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 9258 KiB/s Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com> Acked-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2013-08-05 19:14:36 +08:00
if (host->nfc && host->nfc->use_nfc_sram && host->nfc->data_in_sram) {
memcpy32_fromio(buf, host->nfc->data_in_sram, len);
host->nfc->data_in_sram += len;
} else {
__raw_readsw(nand_chip->IO_ADDR_R, buf, len / 2);
}
}
static void atmel_write_buf8(struct mtd_info *mtd, const u8 *buf, int len)
{
struct nand_chip *nand_chip = mtd->priv;
__raw_writesb(nand_chip->IO_ADDR_W, buf, len);
}
static void atmel_write_buf16(struct mtd_info *mtd, const u8 *buf, int len)
{
struct nand_chip *nand_chip = mtd->priv;
__raw_writesw(nand_chip->IO_ADDR_W, buf, len / 2);
}
static void dma_complete_func(void *completion)
{
complete(completion);
}
mtd: atmel_nand: enable Nand Flash Controller (NFC) read data via sram NFC has embedded sram which can use to transfer data. This patch enable reading nand flash via NFC SRAM. It will minimize the CPU overhead. This driver has been tested on SAMA5D3X-EK with JFFS2, YAFFS2, UBIFS and mtd-utils. Here puts the part of mtd_speedtest (read test) result as following: Compare with non-NFC mtd_speedtest result, reading will reduce %45 cpu load with increase %80 speed. - commands use to test: # insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 & # top -n 30 -d 1 | grep speedtest - test result: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 28% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 25% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 26% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 9403 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 31% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 57% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 53% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 71% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 9258 KiB/s Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com> Acked-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2013-08-05 19:14:36 +08:00
static int nfc_set_sram_bank(struct atmel_nand_host *host, unsigned int bank)
{
/* NFC only has two banks. Must be 0 or 1 */
if (bank > 1)
return -EINVAL;
if (bank) {
/* Only for a 2k-page or lower flash, NFC can handle 2 banks */
if (host->mtd.writesize > 2048)
return -EINVAL;
nfc_writel(host->nfc->hsmc_regs, BANK, ATMEL_HSMC_NFC_BANK1);
} else {
nfc_writel(host->nfc->hsmc_regs, BANK, ATMEL_HSMC_NFC_BANK0);
}
return 0;
}
static uint nfc_get_sram_off(struct atmel_nand_host *host)
{
if (nfc_readl(host->nfc->hsmc_regs, BANK) & ATMEL_HSMC_NFC_BANK1)
return NFC_SRAM_BANK1_OFFSET;
else
return 0;
}
static dma_addr_t nfc_sram_phys(struct atmel_nand_host *host)
{
if (nfc_readl(host->nfc->hsmc_regs, BANK) & ATMEL_HSMC_NFC_BANK1)
return host->nfc->sram_bank0_phys + NFC_SRAM_BANK1_OFFSET;
else
return host->nfc->sram_bank0_phys;
}
static int atmel_nand_dma_op(struct mtd_info *mtd, void *buf, int len,
int is_read)
{
struct dma_device *dma_dev;
enum dma_ctrl_flags flags;
dma_addr_t dma_src_addr, dma_dst_addr, phys_addr;
struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *tx = NULL;
dma_cookie_t cookie;
struct nand_chip *chip = mtd->priv;
struct atmel_nand_host *host = chip->priv;
void *p = buf;
int err = -EIO;
enum dma_data_direction dir = is_read ? DMA_FROM_DEVICE : DMA_TO_DEVICE;
mtd: atmel_nand: enable Nand Flash Controller (NFC) read data via sram NFC has embedded sram which can use to transfer data. This patch enable reading nand flash via NFC SRAM. It will minimize the CPU overhead. This driver has been tested on SAMA5D3X-EK with JFFS2, YAFFS2, UBIFS and mtd-utils. Here puts the part of mtd_speedtest (read test) result as following: Compare with non-NFC mtd_speedtest result, reading will reduce %45 cpu load with increase %80 speed. - commands use to test: # insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 & # top -n 30 -d 1 | grep speedtest - test result: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 28% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 25% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 26% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 9403 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 31% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 57% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 53% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 71% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 9258 KiB/s Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com> Acked-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2013-08-05 19:14:36 +08:00
struct atmel_nfc *nfc = host->nfc;
if (buf >= high_memory)
goto err_buf;
dma_dev = host->dma_chan->device;
flags = DMA_CTRL_ACK | DMA_PREP_INTERRUPT | DMA_COMPL_SKIP_SRC_UNMAP |
DMA_COMPL_SKIP_DEST_UNMAP;
phys_addr = dma_map_single(dma_dev->dev, p, len, dir);
if (dma_mapping_error(dma_dev->dev, phys_addr)) {
dev_err(host->dev, "Failed to dma_map_single\n");
goto err_buf;
}
if (is_read) {
mtd: atmel_nand: enable Nand Flash Controller (NFC) read data via sram NFC has embedded sram which can use to transfer data. This patch enable reading nand flash via NFC SRAM. It will minimize the CPU overhead. This driver has been tested on SAMA5D3X-EK with JFFS2, YAFFS2, UBIFS and mtd-utils. Here puts the part of mtd_speedtest (read test) result as following: Compare with non-NFC mtd_speedtest result, reading will reduce %45 cpu load with increase %80 speed. - commands use to test: # insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 & # top -n 30 -d 1 | grep speedtest - test result: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 28% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 25% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 26% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 9403 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 31% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 57% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 53% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 71% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 9258 KiB/s Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com> Acked-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2013-08-05 19:14:36 +08:00
if (nfc && nfc->data_in_sram)
dma_src_addr = nfc_sram_phys(host) + (nfc->data_in_sram
- (nfc->sram_bank0 + nfc_get_sram_off(host)));
else
dma_src_addr = host->io_phys;
dma_dst_addr = phys_addr;
} else {
dma_src_addr = phys_addr;
mtd: atmel_nand: enable Nand Flash Controller (NFC) write via sram This patch enable writing nand flash via NFC SRAM. It will minimize the CPU overhead. The SRAM write only support ECC_NONE and ECC_HW with PMECC. To enable this NFC write by SRAM feature, you can add a string in dts under NFC driver node. This driver has been tested on SAMA5D3X-EK with JFFS2, YAFFS2, UBIFS and mtd-utils. Here is part of mtd_speedtest (writing test) result, compare with non-NFC writing, it reduces %65 cpu load with loss %12 speed. - commands use to test: # insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 & # top -n 30 -d 1 | grep speedtest - test result: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock write speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 7% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 8% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 5% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock write speed is 5194 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page write speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 32% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 27% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 25% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 30% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page write speed is 5024 KiB/s Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com> Acked-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2013-08-05 19:14:37 +08:00
if (nfc && nfc->write_by_sram)
dma_dst_addr = nfc_sram_phys(host);
else
dma_dst_addr = host->io_phys;
}
tx = dma_dev->device_prep_dma_memcpy(host->dma_chan, dma_dst_addr,
dma_src_addr, len, flags);
if (!tx) {
dev_err(host->dev, "Failed to prepare DMA memcpy\n");
goto err_dma;
}
init_completion(&host->comp);
tx->callback = dma_complete_func;
tx->callback_param = &host->comp;
cookie = tx->tx_submit(tx);
if (dma_submit_error(cookie)) {
dev_err(host->dev, "Failed to do DMA tx_submit\n");
goto err_dma;
}
dma_async_issue_pending(host->dma_chan);
wait_for_completion(&host->comp);
mtd: atmel_nand: enable Nand Flash Controller (NFC) read data via sram NFC has embedded sram which can use to transfer data. This patch enable reading nand flash via NFC SRAM. It will minimize the CPU overhead. This driver has been tested on SAMA5D3X-EK with JFFS2, YAFFS2, UBIFS and mtd-utils. Here puts the part of mtd_speedtest (read test) result as following: Compare with non-NFC mtd_speedtest result, reading will reduce %45 cpu load with increase %80 speed. - commands use to test: # insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 & # top -n 30 -d 1 | grep speedtest - test result: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 28% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 25% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 26% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 9403 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 31% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 57% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 53% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 71% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 9258 KiB/s Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com> Acked-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2013-08-05 19:14:36 +08:00
if (is_read && nfc && nfc->data_in_sram)
/* After read data from SRAM, need to increase the position */
nfc->data_in_sram += len;
err = 0;
err_dma:
dma_unmap_single(dma_dev->dev, phys_addr, len, dir);
err_buf:
if (err != 0)
dev_warn(host->dev, "Fall back to CPU I/O\n");
return err;
}
static void atmel_read_buf(struct mtd_info *mtd, u8 *buf, int len)
{
struct nand_chip *chip = mtd->priv;
struct atmel_nand_host *host = chip->priv;
if (use_dma && len > mtd->oobsize)
/* only use DMA for bigger than oob size: better performances */
if (atmel_nand_dma_op(mtd, buf, len, 1) == 0)
return;
if (host->board.bus_width_16)
atmel_read_buf16(mtd, buf, len);
else
atmel_read_buf8(mtd, buf, len);
}
static void atmel_write_buf(struct mtd_info *mtd, const u8 *buf, int len)
{
struct nand_chip *chip = mtd->priv;
struct atmel_nand_host *host = chip->priv;
if (use_dma && len > mtd->oobsize)
/* only use DMA for bigger than oob size: better performances */
if (atmel_nand_dma_op(mtd, (void *)buf, len, 0) == 0)
return;
if (host->board.bus_width_16)
atmel_write_buf16(mtd, buf, len);
else
atmel_write_buf8(mtd, buf, len);
}
/*
* Return number of ecc bytes per sector according to sector size and
* correction capability
*
* Following table shows what at91 PMECC supported:
* Correction Capability Sector_512_bytes Sector_1024_bytes
* ===================== ================ =================
* 2-bits 4-bytes 4-bytes
* 4-bits 7-bytes 7-bytes
* 8-bits 13-bytes 14-bytes
* 12-bits 20-bytes 21-bytes
* 24-bits 39-bytes 42-bytes
*/
static int pmecc_get_ecc_bytes(int cap, int sector_size)
{
int m = 12 + sector_size / 512;
return (m * cap + 7) / 8;
}
static void pmecc_config_ecc_layout(struct nand_ecclayout *layout,
int oobsize, int ecc_len)
{
int i;
layout->eccbytes = ecc_len;
/* ECC will occupy the last ecc_len bytes continuously */
for (i = 0; i < ecc_len; i++)
layout->eccpos[i] = oobsize - ecc_len + i;
layout->oobfree[0].offset = 2;
layout->oobfree[0].length =
oobsize - ecc_len - layout->oobfree[0].offset;
}
static void __iomem *pmecc_get_alpha_to(struct atmel_nand_host *host)
{
int table_size;
table_size = host->pmecc_sector_size == 512 ?
PMECC_LOOKUP_TABLE_SIZE_512 : PMECC_LOOKUP_TABLE_SIZE_1024;
return host->pmecc_rom_base + host->pmecc_lookup_table_offset +
table_size * sizeof(int16_t);
}
static int pmecc_data_alloc(struct atmel_nand_host *host)
{
const int cap = host->pmecc_corr_cap;
int size;
size = (2 * cap + 1) * sizeof(int16_t);
host->pmecc_partial_syn = devm_kzalloc(host->dev, size, GFP_KERNEL);
host->pmecc_si = devm_kzalloc(host->dev, size, GFP_KERNEL);
host->pmecc_lmu = devm_kzalloc(host->dev,
(cap + 1) * sizeof(int16_t), GFP_KERNEL);
host->pmecc_smu = devm_kzalloc(host->dev,
(cap + 2) * size, GFP_KERNEL);
size = (cap + 1) * sizeof(int);
host->pmecc_mu = devm_kzalloc(host->dev, size, GFP_KERNEL);
host->pmecc_dmu = devm_kzalloc(host->dev, size, GFP_KERNEL);
host->pmecc_delta = devm_kzalloc(host->dev, size, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!host->pmecc_partial_syn ||
!host->pmecc_si ||
!host->pmecc_lmu ||
!host->pmecc_smu ||
!host->pmecc_mu ||
!host->pmecc_dmu ||
!host->pmecc_delta)
return -ENOMEM;
return 0;
}
static void pmecc_gen_syndrome(struct mtd_info *mtd, int sector)
{
struct nand_chip *nand_chip = mtd->priv;
struct atmel_nand_host *host = nand_chip->priv;
int i;
uint32_t value;
/* Fill odd syndromes */
for (i = 0; i < host->pmecc_corr_cap; i++) {
value = pmecc_readl_rem_relaxed(host->ecc, sector, i / 2);
if (i & 1)
value >>= 16;
value &= 0xffff;
host->pmecc_partial_syn[(2 * i) + 1] = (int16_t)value;
}
}
static void pmecc_substitute(struct mtd_info *mtd)
{
struct nand_chip *nand_chip = mtd->priv;
struct atmel_nand_host *host = nand_chip->priv;
int16_t __iomem *alpha_to = host->pmecc_alpha_to;
int16_t __iomem *index_of = host->pmecc_index_of;
int16_t *partial_syn = host->pmecc_partial_syn;
const int cap = host->pmecc_corr_cap;
int16_t *si;
int i, j;
/* si[] is a table that holds the current syndrome value,
* an element of that table belongs to the field
*/
si = host->pmecc_si;
memset(&si[1], 0, sizeof(int16_t) * (2 * cap - 1));
/* Computation 2t syndromes based on S(x) */
/* Odd syndromes */
for (i = 1; i < 2 * cap; i += 2) {
for (j = 0; j < host->pmecc_degree; j++) {
if (partial_syn[i] & ((unsigned short)0x1 << j))
si[i] = readw_relaxed(alpha_to + i * j) ^ si[i];
}
}
/* Even syndrome = (Odd syndrome) ** 2 */
for (i = 2, j = 1; j <= cap; i = ++j << 1) {
if (si[j] == 0) {
si[i] = 0;
} else {
int16_t tmp;
tmp = readw_relaxed(index_of + si[j]);
tmp = (tmp * 2) % host->pmecc_cw_len;
si[i] = readw_relaxed(alpha_to + tmp);
}
}
return;
}
static void pmecc_get_sigma(struct mtd_info *mtd)
{
struct nand_chip *nand_chip = mtd->priv;
struct atmel_nand_host *host = nand_chip->priv;
int16_t *lmu = host->pmecc_lmu;
int16_t *si = host->pmecc_si;
int *mu = host->pmecc_mu;
int *dmu = host->pmecc_dmu; /* Discrepancy */
int *delta = host->pmecc_delta; /* Delta order */
int cw_len = host->pmecc_cw_len;
const int16_t cap = host->pmecc_corr_cap;
const int num = 2 * cap + 1;
int16_t __iomem *index_of = host->pmecc_index_of;
int16_t __iomem *alpha_to = host->pmecc_alpha_to;
int i, j, k;
uint32_t dmu_0_count, tmp;
int16_t *smu = host->pmecc_smu;
/* index of largest delta */
int ro;
int largest;
int diff;
dmu_0_count = 0;
/* First Row */
/* Mu */
mu[0] = -1;
memset(smu, 0, sizeof(int16_t) * num);
smu[0] = 1;
/* discrepancy set to 1 */
dmu[0] = 1;
/* polynom order set to 0 */
lmu[0] = 0;
delta[0] = (mu[0] * 2 - lmu[0]) >> 1;
/* Second Row */
/* Mu */
mu[1] = 0;
/* Sigma(x) set to 1 */
memset(&smu[num], 0, sizeof(int16_t) * num);
smu[num] = 1;
/* discrepancy set to S1 */
dmu[1] = si[1];
/* polynom order set to 0 */
lmu[1] = 0;
delta[1] = (mu[1] * 2 - lmu[1]) >> 1;
/* Init the Sigma(x) last row */
memset(&smu[(cap + 1) * num], 0, sizeof(int16_t) * num);
for (i = 1; i <= cap; i++) {
mu[i + 1] = i << 1;
/* Begin Computing Sigma (Mu+1) and L(mu) */
/* check if discrepancy is set to 0 */
if (dmu[i] == 0) {
dmu_0_count++;
tmp = ((cap - (lmu[i] >> 1) - 1) / 2);
if ((cap - (lmu[i] >> 1) - 1) & 0x1)
tmp += 2;
else
tmp += 1;
if (dmu_0_count == tmp) {
for (j = 0; j <= (lmu[i] >> 1) + 1; j++)
smu[(cap + 1) * num + j] =
smu[i * num + j];
lmu[cap + 1] = lmu[i];
return;
}
/* copy polynom */
for (j = 0; j <= lmu[i] >> 1; j++)
smu[(i + 1) * num + j] = smu[i * num + j];
/* copy previous polynom order to the next */
lmu[i + 1] = lmu[i];
} else {
ro = 0;
largest = -1;
/* find largest delta with dmu != 0 */
for (j = 0; j < i; j++) {
if ((dmu[j]) && (delta[j] > largest)) {
largest = delta[j];
ro = j;
}
}
/* compute difference */
diff = (mu[i] - mu[ro]);
/* Compute degree of the new smu polynomial */
if ((lmu[i] >> 1) > ((lmu[ro] >> 1) + diff))
lmu[i + 1] = lmu[i];
else
lmu[i + 1] = ((lmu[ro] >> 1) + diff) * 2;
/* Init smu[i+1] with 0 */
for (k = 0; k < num; k++)
smu[(i + 1) * num + k] = 0;
/* Compute smu[i+1] */
for (k = 0; k <= lmu[ro] >> 1; k++) {
int16_t a, b, c;
if (!(smu[ro * num + k] && dmu[i]))
continue;
a = readw_relaxed(index_of + dmu[i]);
b = readw_relaxed(index_of + dmu[ro]);
c = readw_relaxed(index_of + smu[ro * num + k]);
tmp = a + (cw_len - b) + c;
a = readw_relaxed(alpha_to + tmp % cw_len);
smu[(i + 1) * num + (k + diff)] = a;
}
for (k = 0; k <= lmu[i] >> 1; k++)
smu[(i + 1) * num + k] ^= smu[i * num + k];
}
/* End Computing Sigma (Mu+1) and L(mu) */
/* In either case compute delta */
delta[i + 1] = (mu[i + 1] * 2 - lmu[i + 1]) >> 1;
/* Do not compute discrepancy for the last iteration */
if (i >= cap)
continue;
for (k = 0; k <= (lmu[i + 1] >> 1); k++) {
tmp = 2 * (i - 1);
if (k == 0) {
dmu[i + 1] = si[tmp + 3];
} else if (smu[(i + 1) * num + k] && si[tmp + 3 - k]) {
int16_t a, b, c;
a = readw_relaxed(index_of +
smu[(i + 1) * num + k]);
b = si[2 * (i - 1) + 3 - k];
c = readw_relaxed(index_of + b);
tmp = a + c;
tmp %= cw_len;
dmu[i + 1] = readw_relaxed(alpha_to + tmp) ^
dmu[i + 1];
}
}
}
return;
}
static int pmecc_err_location(struct mtd_info *mtd)
{
struct nand_chip *nand_chip = mtd->priv;
struct atmel_nand_host *host = nand_chip->priv;
unsigned long end_time;
const int cap = host->pmecc_corr_cap;
const int num = 2 * cap + 1;
int sector_size = host->pmecc_sector_size;
int err_nbr = 0; /* number of error */
int roots_nbr; /* number of roots */
int i;
uint32_t val;
int16_t *smu = host->pmecc_smu;
pmerrloc_writel(host->pmerrloc_base, ELDIS, PMERRLOC_DISABLE);
for (i = 0; i <= host->pmecc_lmu[cap + 1] >> 1; i++) {
pmerrloc_writel_sigma_relaxed(host->pmerrloc_base, i,
smu[(cap + 1) * num + i]);
err_nbr++;
}
val = (err_nbr - 1) << 16;
if (sector_size == 1024)
val |= 1;
pmerrloc_writel(host->pmerrloc_base, ELCFG, val);
pmerrloc_writel(host->pmerrloc_base, ELEN,
sector_size * 8 + host->pmecc_degree * cap);
end_time = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(PMECC_MAX_TIMEOUT_MS);
while (!(pmerrloc_readl_relaxed(host->pmerrloc_base, ELISR)
& PMERRLOC_CALC_DONE)) {
if (unlikely(time_after(jiffies, end_time))) {
dev_err(host->dev, "PMECC: Timeout to calculate error location.\n");
return -1;
}
cpu_relax();
}
roots_nbr = (pmerrloc_readl_relaxed(host->pmerrloc_base, ELISR)
& PMERRLOC_ERR_NUM_MASK) >> 8;
/* Number of roots == degree of smu hence <= cap */
if (roots_nbr == host->pmecc_lmu[cap + 1] >> 1)
return err_nbr - 1;
/* Number of roots does not match the degree of smu
* unable to correct error */
return -1;
}
static void pmecc_correct_data(struct mtd_info *mtd, uint8_t *buf, uint8_t *ecc,
int sector_num, int extra_bytes, int err_nbr)
{
struct nand_chip *nand_chip = mtd->priv;
struct atmel_nand_host *host = nand_chip->priv;
int i = 0;
int byte_pos, bit_pos, sector_size, pos;
uint32_t tmp;
uint8_t err_byte;
sector_size = host->pmecc_sector_size;
while (err_nbr) {
tmp = pmerrloc_readl_el_relaxed(host->pmerrloc_base, i) - 1;
byte_pos = tmp / 8;
bit_pos = tmp % 8;
if (byte_pos >= (sector_size + extra_bytes))
BUG(); /* should never happen */
if (byte_pos < sector_size) {
err_byte = *(buf + byte_pos);
*(buf + byte_pos) ^= (1 << bit_pos);
pos = sector_num * host->pmecc_sector_size + byte_pos;
dev_info(host->dev, "Bit flip in data area, byte_pos: %d, bit_pos: %d, 0x%02x -> 0x%02x\n",
pos, bit_pos, err_byte, *(buf + byte_pos));
} else {
/* Bit flip in OOB area */
tmp = sector_num * host->pmecc_bytes_per_sector
+ (byte_pos - sector_size);
err_byte = ecc[tmp];
ecc[tmp] ^= (1 << bit_pos);
pos = tmp + nand_chip->ecc.layout->eccpos[0];
dev_info(host->dev, "Bit flip in OOB, oob_byte_pos: %d, bit_pos: %d, 0x%02x -> 0x%02x\n",
pos, bit_pos, err_byte, ecc[tmp]);
}
i++;
err_nbr--;
}
return;
}
static int pmecc_correction(struct mtd_info *mtd, u32 pmecc_stat, uint8_t *buf,
u8 *ecc)
{
struct nand_chip *nand_chip = mtd->priv;
struct atmel_nand_host *host = nand_chip->priv;
int i, err_nbr, eccbytes;
uint8_t *buf_pos;
int total_err = 0;
eccbytes = nand_chip->ecc.bytes;
for (i = 0; i < eccbytes; i++)
if (ecc[i] != 0xff)
goto normal_check;
/* Erased page, return OK */
return 0;
normal_check:
for (i = 0; i < host->pmecc_sector_number; i++) {
err_nbr = 0;
if (pmecc_stat & 0x1) {
buf_pos = buf + i * host->pmecc_sector_size;
pmecc_gen_syndrome(mtd, i);
pmecc_substitute(mtd);
pmecc_get_sigma(mtd);
err_nbr = pmecc_err_location(mtd);
if (err_nbr == -1) {
dev_err(host->dev, "PMECC: Too many errors\n");
mtd->ecc_stats.failed++;
return -EIO;
} else {
pmecc_correct_data(mtd, buf_pos, ecc, i,
host->pmecc_bytes_per_sector, err_nbr);
mtd->ecc_stats.corrected += err_nbr;
total_err += err_nbr;
}
}
pmecc_stat >>= 1;
}
return total_err;
}
static void pmecc_enable(struct atmel_nand_host *host, int ecc_op)
{
u32 val;
pmecc_writel(host->ecc, CTRL, PMECC_CTRL_RST);
pmecc_writel(host->ecc, CTRL, PMECC_CTRL_DISABLE);
val = pmecc_readl_relaxed(host->ecc, CFG);
if (ecc_op != NAND_ECC_READ && ecc_op != NAND_ECC_WRITE) {
dev_err(host->dev, "atmel_nand: wrong pmecc operation type!");
return;
}
if (ecc_op == NAND_ECC_READ)
pmecc_writel(host->ecc, CFG, (val & ~PMECC_CFG_WRITE_OP)
| PMECC_CFG_AUTO_ENABLE);
else
pmecc_writel(host->ecc, CFG, (val | PMECC_CFG_WRITE_OP)
& ~PMECC_CFG_AUTO_ENABLE);
pmecc_writel(host->ecc, CTRL, PMECC_CTRL_ENABLE);
pmecc_writel(host->ecc, CTRL, PMECC_CTRL_DATA);
}
static int atmel_nand_pmecc_read_page(struct mtd_info *mtd,
struct nand_chip *chip, uint8_t *buf, int oob_required, int page)
{
struct atmel_nand_host *host = chip->priv;
int eccsize = chip->ecc.size;
uint8_t *oob = chip->oob_poi;
uint32_t *eccpos = chip->ecc.layout->eccpos;
uint32_t stat;
unsigned long end_time;
int bitflips = 0;
mtd: atmel_nand: enable Nand Flash Controller (NFC) read data via sram NFC has embedded sram which can use to transfer data. This patch enable reading nand flash via NFC SRAM. It will minimize the CPU overhead. This driver has been tested on SAMA5D3X-EK with JFFS2, YAFFS2, UBIFS and mtd-utils. Here puts the part of mtd_speedtest (read test) result as following: Compare with non-NFC mtd_speedtest result, reading will reduce %45 cpu load with increase %80 speed. - commands use to test: # insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 & # top -n 30 -d 1 | grep speedtest - test result: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 28% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 25% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 26% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 9403 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 31% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 57% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 53% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 71% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 9258 KiB/s Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com> Acked-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2013-08-05 19:14:36 +08:00
if (!host->nfc || !host->nfc->use_nfc_sram)
pmecc_enable(host, NAND_ECC_READ);
chip->read_buf(mtd, buf, eccsize);
chip->read_buf(mtd, oob, mtd->oobsize);
end_time = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(PMECC_MAX_TIMEOUT_MS);
while ((pmecc_readl_relaxed(host->ecc, SR) & PMECC_SR_BUSY)) {
if (unlikely(time_after(jiffies, end_time))) {
dev_err(host->dev, "PMECC: Timeout to get error status.\n");
return -EIO;
}
cpu_relax();
}
stat = pmecc_readl_relaxed(host->ecc, ISR);
if (stat != 0) {
bitflips = pmecc_correction(mtd, stat, buf, &oob[eccpos[0]]);
if (bitflips < 0)
/* uncorrectable errors */
return 0;
}
return bitflips;
}
static int atmel_nand_pmecc_write_page(struct mtd_info *mtd,
struct nand_chip *chip, const uint8_t *buf, int oob_required)
{
struct atmel_nand_host *host = chip->priv;
uint32_t *eccpos = chip->ecc.layout->eccpos;
int i, j;
unsigned long end_time;
mtd: atmel_nand: enable Nand Flash Controller (NFC) write via sram This patch enable writing nand flash via NFC SRAM. It will minimize the CPU overhead. The SRAM write only support ECC_NONE and ECC_HW with PMECC. To enable this NFC write by SRAM feature, you can add a string in dts under NFC driver node. This driver has been tested on SAMA5D3X-EK with JFFS2, YAFFS2, UBIFS and mtd-utils. Here is part of mtd_speedtest (writing test) result, compare with non-NFC writing, it reduces %65 cpu load with loss %12 speed. - commands use to test: # insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 & # top -n 30 -d 1 | grep speedtest - test result: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock write speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 7% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 8% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 5% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock write speed is 5194 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page write speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 32% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 27% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 25% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 30% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page write speed is 5024 KiB/s Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com> Acked-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2013-08-05 19:14:37 +08:00
if (!host->nfc || !host->nfc->write_by_sram) {
pmecc_enable(host, NAND_ECC_WRITE);
chip->write_buf(mtd, (u8 *)buf, mtd->writesize);
}
end_time = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(PMECC_MAX_TIMEOUT_MS);
while ((pmecc_readl_relaxed(host->ecc, SR) & PMECC_SR_BUSY)) {
if (unlikely(time_after(jiffies, end_time))) {
dev_err(host->dev, "PMECC: Timeout to get ECC value.\n");
return -EIO;
}
cpu_relax();
}
for (i = 0; i < host->pmecc_sector_number; i++) {
for (j = 0; j < host->pmecc_bytes_per_sector; j++) {
int pos;
pos = i * host->pmecc_bytes_per_sector + j;
chip->oob_poi[eccpos[pos]] =
pmecc_readb_ecc_relaxed(host->ecc, i, j);
}
}
chip->write_buf(mtd, chip->oob_poi, mtd->oobsize);
return 0;
}
static void atmel_pmecc_core_init(struct mtd_info *mtd)
{
struct nand_chip *nand_chip = mtd->priv;
struct atmel_nand_host *host = nand_chip->priv;
uint32_t val = 0;
struct nand_ecclayout *ecc_layout;
pmecc_writel(host->ecc, CTRL, PMECC_CTRL_RST);
pmecc_writel(host->ecc, CTRL, PMECC_CTRL_DISABLE);
switch (host->pmecc_corr_cap) {
case 2:
val = PMECC_CFG_BCH_ERR2;
break;
case 4:
val = PMECC_CFG_BCH_ERR4;
break;
case 8:
val = PMECC_CFG_BCH_ERR8;
break;
case 12:
val = PMECC_CFG_BCH_ERR12;
break;
case 24:
val = PMECC_CFG_BCH_ERR24;
break;
}
if (host->pmecc_sector_size == 512)
val |= PMECC_CFG_SECTOR512;
else if (host->pmecc_sector_size == 1024)
val |= PMECC_CFG_SECTOR1024;
switch (host->pmecc_sector_number) {
case 1:
val |= PMECC_CFG_PAGE_1SECTOR;
break;
case 2:
val |= PMECC_CFG_PAGE_2SECTORS;
break;
case 4:
val |= PMECC_CFG_PAGE_4SECTORS;
break;
case 8:
val |= PMECC_CFG_PAGE_8SECTORS;
break;
}
val |= (PMECC_CFG_READ_OP | PMECC_CFG_SPARE_DISABLE
| PMECC_CFG_AUTO_DISABLE);
pmecc_writel(host->ecc, CFG, val);
ecc_layout = nand_chip->ecc.layout;
pmecc_writel(host->ecc, SAREA, mtd->oobsize - 1);
pmecc_writel(host->ecc, SADDR, ecc_layout->eccpos[0]);
pmecc_writel(host->ecc, EADDR,
ecc_layout->eccpos[ecc_layout->eccbytes - 1]);
/* See datasheet about PMECC Clock Control Register */
pmecc_writel(host->ecc, CLK, 2);
pmecc_writel(host->ecc, IDR, 0xff);
pmecc_writel(host->ecc, CTRL, PMECC_CTRL_ENABLE);
}
/*
* Get ECC requirement in ONFI parameters, returns -1 if ONFI
* parameters is not supported.
* return 0 if success to get the ECC requirement.
*/
static int get_onfi_ecc_param(struct nand_chip *chip,
int *ecc_bits, int *sector_size)
{
*ecc_bits = *sector_size = 0;
if (chip->onfi_params.ecc_bits == 0xff)
/* TODO: the sector_size and ecc_bits need to be find in
* extended ecc parameter, currently we don't support it.
*/
return -1;
*ecc_bits = chip->onfi_params.ecc_bits;
/* The default sector size (ecc codeword size) is 512 */
*sector_size = 512;
return 0;
}
/*
* Get ecc requirement from ONFI parameters ecc requirement.
* If pmecc-cap, pmecc-sector-size in DTS are not specified, this function
* will set them according to ONFI ecc requirement. Otherwise, use the
* value in DTS file.
* return 0 if success. otherwise return error code.
*/
static int pmecc_choose_ecc(struct atmel_nand_host *host,
int *cap, int *sector_size)
{
/* Get ECC requirement from ONFI parameters */
*cap = *sector_size = 0;
if (host->nand_chip.onfi_version) {
if (!get_onfi_ecc_param(&host->nand_chip, cap, sector_size))
dev_info(host->dev, "ONFI params, minimum required ECC: %d bits in %d bytes\n",
*cap, *sector_size);
else
dev_info(host->dev, "NAND chip ECC reqirement is in Extended ONFI parameter, we don't support yet.\n");
} else {
dev_info(host->dev, "NAND chip is not ONFI compliant, assume ecc_bits is 2 in 512 bytes");
}
if (*cap == 0 && *sector_size == 0) {
*cap = 2;
*sector_size = 512;
}
/* If dts file doesn't specify then use the one in ONFI parameters */
if (host->pmecc_corr_cap == 0) {
/* use the most fitable ecc bits (the near bigger one ) */
if (*cap <= 2)
host->pmecc_corr_cap = 2;
else if (*cap <= 4)
host->pmecc_corr_cap = 4;
else if (*cap <= 8)
host->pmecc_corr_cap = 8;
else if (*cap <= 12)
host->pmecc_corr_cap = 12;
else if (*cap <= 24)
host->pmecc_corr_cap = 24;
else
return -EINVAL;
}
if (host->pmecc_sector_size == 0) {
/* use the most fitable sector size (the near smaller one ) */
if (*sector_size >= 1024)
host->pmecc_sector_size = 1024;
else if (*sector_size >= 512)
host->pmecc_sector_size = 512;
else
return -EINVAL;
}
return 0;
}
static int __init atmel_pmecc_nand_init_params(struct platform_device *pdev,
struct atmel_nand_host *host)
{
struct mtd_info *mtd = &host->mtd;
struct nand_chip *nand_chip = &host->nand_chip;
struct resource *regs, *regs_pmerr, *regs_rom;
int cap, sector_size, err_no;
err_no = pmecc_choose_ecc(host, &cap, &sector_size);
if (err_no) {
dev_err(host->dev, "The NAND flash's ECC requirement are not support!");
return err_no;
}
if (cap > host->pmecc_corr_cap ||
sector_size != host->pmecc_sector_size)
dev_info(host->dev, "WARNING: Be Caution! Using different PMECC parameters from Nand ONFI ECC reqirement.\n");
cap = host->pmecc_corr_cap;
sector_size = host->pmecc_sector_size;
host->pmecc_lookup_table_offset = (sector_size == 512) ?
host->pmecc_lookup_table_offset_512 :
host->pmecc_lookup_table_offset_1024;
dev_info(host->dev, "Initialize PMECC params, cap: %d, sector: %d\n",
cap, sector_size);
regs = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 1);
if (!regs) {
dev_warn(host->dev,
"Can't get I/O resource regs for PMECC controller, rolling back on software ECC\n");
nand_chip->ecc.mode = NAND_ECC_SOFT;
return 0;
}
host->ecc = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, regs);
if (IS_ERR(host->ecc)) {
dev_err(host->dev, "ioremap failed\n");
err_no = PTR_ERR(host->ecc);
goto err;
}
regs_pmerr = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 2);
host->pmerrloc_base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, regs_pmerr);
if (IS_ERR(host->pmerrloc_base)) {
dev_err(host->dev,
"Can not get I/O resource for PMECC ERRLOC controller!\n");
err_no = PTR_ERR(host->pmerrloc_base);
goto err;
}
regs_rom = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 3);
host->pmecc_rom_base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, regs_rom);
if (IS_ERR(host->pmecc_rom_base)) {
dev_err(host->dev, "Can not get I/O resource for ROM!\n");
err_no = PTR_ERR(host->pmecc_rom_base);
goto err;
}
/* ECC is calculated for the whole page (1 step) */
nand_chip->ecc.size = mtd->writesize;
/* set ECC page size and oob layout */
switch (mtd->writesize) {
case 2048:
host->pmecc_degree = PMECC_GF_DIMENSION_13;
host->pmecc_cw_len = (1 << host->pmecc_degree) - 1;
host->pmecc_sector_number = mtd->writesize / sector_size;
host->pmecc_bytes_per_sector = pmecc_get_ecc_bytes(
cap, sector_size);
host->pmecc_alpha_to = pmecc_get_alpha_to(host);
host->pmecc_index_of = host->pmecc_rom_base +
host->pmecc_lookup_table_offset;
nand_chip->ecc.steps = 1;
nand_chip->ecc.strength = cap;
nand_chip->ecc.bytes = host->pmecc_bytes_per_sector *
host->pmecc_sector_number;
if (nand_chip->ecc.bytes > mtd->oobsize - 2) {
dev_err(host->dev, "No room for ECC bytes\n");
err_no = -EINVAL;
goto err;
}
pmecc_config_ecc_layout(&atmel_pmecc_oobinfo,
mtd->oobsize,
nand_chip->ecc.bytes);
nand_chip->ecc.layout = &atmel_pmecc_oobinfo;
break;
case 512:
case 1024:
case 4096:
/* TODO */
dev_warn(host->dev,
"Unsupported page size for PMECC, use Software ECC\n");
default:
/* page size not handled by HW ECC */
/* switching back to soft ECC */
nand_chip->ecc.mode = NAND_ECC_SOFT;
return 0;
}
/* Allocate data for PMECC computation */
err_no = pmecc_data_alloc(host);
if (err_no) {
dev_err(host->dev,
"Cannot allocate memory for PMECC computation!\n");
goto err;
}
nand_chip->ecc.read_page = atmel_nand_pmecc_read_page;
nand_chip->ecc.write_page = atmel_nand_pmecc_write_page;
atmel_pmecc_core_init(mtd);
return 0;
err:
return err_no;
}
/*
* Calculate HW ECC
*
* function called after a write
*
* mtd: MTD block structure
* dat: raw data (unused)
* ecc_code: buffer for ECC
*/
static int atmel_nand_calculate(struct mtd_info *mtd,
const u_char *dat, unsigned char *ecc_code)
{
struct nand_chip *nand_chip = mtd->priv;
struct atmel_nand_host *host = nand_chip->priv;
unsigned int ecc_value;
/* get the first 2 ECC bytes */
ecc_value = ecc_readl(host->ecc, PR);
ecc_code[0] = ecc_value & 0xFF;
ecc_code[1] = (ecc_value >> 8) & 0xFF;
/* get the last 2 ECC bytes */
ecc_value = ecc_readl(host->ecc, NPR) & ATMEL_ECC_NPARITY;
ecc_code[2] = ecc_value & 0xFF;
ecc_code[3] = (ecc_value >> 8) & 0xFF;
return 0;
}
/*
* HW ECC read page function
*
* mtd: mtd info structure
* chip: nand chip info structure
* buf: buffer to store read data
mtd: nand: add 'oob_required' argument to NAND {read,write}_page interfaces New NAND controllers can perform read/write via HW engines which don't expose OOB data in their DMA mode. To reflect this, we should rework the nand_chip / nand_ecc_ctrl interfaces that assume that drivers will always read/write OOB data in the nand_chip.oob_poi buffer. A better interface includes a boolean argument that explicitly tells the callee when OOB data is requested by the calling layer (for reading/writing to/from nand_chip.oob_poi). This patch adds the 'oob_required' parameter to each relevant {read,write}_page interface; all 'oob_required' parameters are left unused for now. The next patch will set the parameter properly in the nand_base.c callers, and follow-up patches will make use of 'oob_required' in some of the callee functions. Note that currently, there is no harm in ignoring the 'oob_required' parameter and *always* utilizing nand_chip.oob_poi, but there can be performance/complexity/design benefits from avoiding filling oob_poi in the common case. I will try to implement this for some drivers which can be ported easily. Note: I couldn't compile-test all of these easily, as some had ARCH dependencies. [dwmw2: Merge later 1/0 vs. true/false cleanup] Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com> Acked-by: Jiandong Zheng <jdzheng@broadcom.com> Acked-by: Mike Dunn <mikedunn@newsguy.com> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2012-05-03 01:14:55 +08:00
* oob_required: caller expects OOB data read to chip->oob_poi
*/
mtd: nand: add 'oob_required' argument to NAND {read,write}_page interfaces New NAND controllers can perform read/write via HW engines which don't expose OOB data in their DMA mode. To reflect this, we should rework the nand_chip / nand_ecc_ctrl interfaces that assume that drivers will always read/write OOB data in the nand_chip.oob_poi buffer. A better interface includes a boolean argument that explicitly tells the callee when OOB data is requested by the calling layer (for reading/writing to/from nand_chip.oob_poi). This patch adds the 'oob_required' parameter to each relevant {read,write}_page interface; all 'oob_required' parameters are left unused for now. The next patch will set the parameter properly in the nand_base.c callers, and follow-up patches will make use of 'oob_required' in some of the callee functions. Note that currently, there is no harm in ignoring the 'oob_required' parameter and *always* utilizing nand_chip.oob_poi, but there can be performance/complexity/design benefits from avoiding filling oob_poi in the common case. I will try to implement this for some drivers which can be ported easily. Note: I couldn't compile-test all of these easily, as some had ARCH dependencies. [dwmw2: Merge later 1/0 vs. true/false cleanup] Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com> Acked-by: Jiandong Zheng <jdzheng@broadcom.com> Acked-by: Mike Dunn <mikedunn@newsguy.com> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2012-05-03 01:14:55 +08:00
static int atmel_nand_read_page(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct nand_chip *chip,
uint8_t *buf, int oob_required, int page)
{
int eccsize = chip->ecc.size;
int eccbytes = chip->ecc.bytes;
uint32_t *eccpos = chip->ecc.layout->eccpos;
uint8_t *p = buf;
uint8_t *oob = chip->oob_poi;
uint8_t *ecc_pos;
int stat;
unsigned int max_bitflips = 0;
/*
* Errata: ALE is incorrectly wired up to the ECC controller
* on the AP7000, so it will include the address cycles in the
* ECC calculation.
*
* Workaround: Reset the parity registers before reading the
* actual data.
*/
struct atmel_nand_host *host = chip->priv;
if (host->board.need_reset_workaround)
ecc_writel(host->ecc, CR, ATMEL_ECC_RST);
/* read the page */
chip->read_buf(mtd, p, eccsize);
/* move to ECC position if needed */
if (eccpos[0] != 0) {
/* This only works on large pages
* because the ECC controller waits for
* NAND_CMD_RNDOUTSTART after the
* NAND_CMD_RNDOUT.
* anyway, for small pages, the eccpos[0] == 0
*/
chip->cmdfunc(mtd, NAND_CMD_RNDOUT,
mtd->writesize + eccpos[0], -1);
}
/* the ECC controller needs to read the ECC just after the data */
ecc_pos = oob + eccpos[0];
chip->read_buf(mtd, ecc_pos, eccbytes);
/* check if there's an error */
stat = chip->ecc.correct(mtd, p, oob, NULL);
if (stat < 0) {
mtd->ecc_stats.failed++;
} else {
mtd->ecc_stats.corrected += stat;
max_bitflips = max_t(unsigned int, max_bitflips, stat);
}
/* get back to oob start (end of page) */
chip->cmdfunc(mtd, NAND_CMD_RNDOUT, mtd->writesize, -1);
/* read the oob */
chip->read_buf(mtd, oob, mtd->oobsize);
return max_bitflips;
}
/*
* HW ECC Correction
*
* function called after a read
*
* mtd: MTD block structure
* dat: raw data read from the chip
* read_ecc: ECC from the chip (unused)
* isnull: unused
*
* Detect and correct a 1 bit error for a page
*/
static int atmel_nand_correct(struct mtd_info *mtd, u_char *dat,
u_char *read_ecc, u_char *isnull)
{
struct nand_chip *nand_chip = mtd->priv;
struct atmel_nand_host *host = nand_chip->priv;
unsigned int ecc_status;
unsigned int ecc_word, ecc_bit;
/* get the status from the Status Register */
ecc_status = ecc_readl(host->ecc, SR);
/* if there's no error */
if (likely(!(ecc_status & ATMEL_ECC_RECERR)))
return 0;
/* get error bit offset (4 bits) */
ecc_bit = ecc_readl(host->ecc, PR) & ATMEL_ECC_BITADDR;
/* get word address (12 bits) */
ecc_word = ecc_readl(host->ecc, PR) & ATMEL_ECC_WORDADDR;
ecc_word >>= 4;
/* if there are multiple errors */
if (ecc_status & ATMEL_ECC_MULERR) {
/* check if it is a freshly erased block
* (filled with 0xff) */
if ((ecc_bit == ATMEL_ECC_BITADDR)
&& (ecc_word == (ATMEL_ECC_WORDADDR >> 4))) {
/* the block has just been erased, return OK */
return 0;
}
/* it doesn't seems to be a freshly
* erased block.
* We can't correct so many errors */
dev_dbg(host->dev, "atmel_nand : multiple errors detected."
" Unable to correct.\n");
return -EIO;
}
/* if there's a single bit error : we can correct it */
if (ecc_status & ATMEL_ECC_ECCERR) {
/* there's nothing much to do here.
* the bit error is on the ECC itself.
*/
dev_dbg(host->dev, "atmel_nand : one bit error on ECC code."
" Nothing to correct\n");
return 0;
}
dev_dbg(host->dev, "atmel_nand : one bit error on data."
" (word offset in the page :"
" 0x%x bit offset : 0x%x)\n",
ecc_word, ecc_bit);
/* correct the error */
if (nand_chip->options & NAND_BUSWIDTH_16) {
/* 16 bits words */
((unsigned short *) dat)[ecc_word] ^= (1 << ecc_bit);
} else {
/* 8 bits words */
dat[ecc_word] ^= (1 << ecc_bit);
}
dev_dbg(host->dev, "atmel_nand : error corrected\n");
return 1;
}
/*
* Enable HW ECC : unused on most chips
*/
static void atmel_nand_hwctl(struct mtd_info *mtd, int mode)
{
struct nand_chip *nand_chip = mtd->priv;
struct atmel_nand_host *host = nand_chip->priv;
if (host->board.need_reset_workaround)
ecc_writel(host->ecc, CR, ATMEL_ECC_RST);
}
#if defined(CONFIG_OF)
static int atmel_of_init_port(struct atmel_nand_host *host,
struct device_node *np)
{
u32 val;
u32 offset[2];
int ecc_mode;
struct atmel_nand_data *board = &host->board;
enum of_gpio_flags flags;
if (of_property_read_u32(np, "atmel,nand-addr-offset", &val) == 0) {
if (val >= 32) {
dev_err(host->dev, "invalid addr-offset %u\n", val);
return -EINVAL;
}
board->ale = val;
}
if (of_property_read_u32(np, "atmel,nand-cmd-offset", &val) == 0) {
if (val >= 32) {
dev_err(host->dev, "invalid cmd-offset %u\n", val);
return -EINVAL;
}
board->cle = val;
}
ecc_mode = of_get_nand_ecc_mode(np);
board->ecc_mode = ecc_mode < 0 ? NAND_ECC_SOFT : ecc_mode;
board->on_flash_bbt = of_get_nand_on_flash_bbt(np);
board->has_dma = of_property_read_bool(np, "atmel,nand-has-dma");
if (of_get_nand_bus_width(np) == 16)
board->bus_width_16 = 1;
board->rdy_pin = of_get_gpio_flags(np, 0, &flags);
board->rdy_pin_active_low = (flags == OF_GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW);
board->enable_pin = of_get_gpio(np, 1);
board->det_pin = of_get_gpio(np, 2);
host->has_pmecc = of_property_read_bool(np, "atmel,has-pmecc");
mtd: atmel_nand: add Nand Flash Controller (NFC) support Nand Flash Controller (NFC) can handle automatic transfers, sending the commands and address cycles to the NAND Flash. To use NFC in this driver, user needs to add NFC child node in nand flash driver. The NFC child node includes NFC's compatible string and regiters of the address and size of NFC command registers, NFC registers (embedded in HSMC) and NFC SRAM. Also user need to set up the HSMC irq, which use to check whether nfc command is finish or not. This driver has been tested on SAMA5D3X-EK board with JFFS2, YAFFS, UBIFS and mtd-utils. I put the part of the mtd_speedtest result here for your information. >From the mtd_speedtest, we can see the NFC will reduce the %50 of cpu load when writing nand flash. No change when reading. In the meantime, the speed will be slow about %8. - commands use to test: #insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 & #top -n 30 -d 1 | grep speedtest - test result: Before the patch: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 515 495 root R 1164 0% 93% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 99% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock write speed is 5768 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 92% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 5932 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page write speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page write speed is 5770 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 89% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 5910 KiB/s After the patch: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock write speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 49% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 50% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 47% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock write speed is 5370 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 92% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 95% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 5715 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page write speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 48% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 47% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 50% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page write speed is 5224 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 89% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 93% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 5641 KiB/s Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2013-08-05 19:14:35 +08:00
/* load the nfc driver if there is */
of_platform_populate(np, NULL, NULL, host->dev);
if (!(board->ecc_mode == NAND_ECC_HW) || !host->has_pmecc)
return 0; /* Not using PMECC */
/* use PMECC, get correction capability, sector size and lookup
* table offset.
* If correction bits and sector size are not specified, then find
* them from NAND ONFI parameters.
*/
if (of_property_read_u32(np, "atmel,pmecc-cap", &val) == 0) {
if ((val != 2) && (val != 4) && (val != 8) && (val != 12) &&
(val != 24)) {
dev_err(host->dev,
"Unsupported PMECC correction capability: %d; should be 2, 4, 8, 12 or 24\n",
val);
return -EINVAL;
}
host->pmecc_corr_cap = (u8)val;
}
if (of_property_read_u32(np, "atmel,pmecc-sector-size", &val) == 0) {
if ((val != 512) && (val != 1024)) {
dev_err(host->dev,
"Unsupported PMECC sector size: %d; should be 512 or 1024 bytes\n",
val);
return -EINVAL;
}
host->pmecc_sector_size = (u16)val;
}
if (of_property_read_u32_array(np, "atmel,pmecc-lookup-table-offset",
offset, 2) != 0) {
dev_err(host->dev, "Cannot get PMECC lookup table offset\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
if (!offset[0] && !offset[1]) {
dev_err(host->dev, "Invalid PMECC lookup table offset\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
host->pmecc_lookup_table_offset_512 = offset[0];
host->pmecc_lookup_table_offset_1024 = offset[1];
return 0;
}
#else
static int atmel_of_init_port(struct atmel_nand_host *host,
struct device_node *np)
{
return -EINVAL;
}
#endif
static int __init atmel_hw_nand_init_params(struct platform_device *pdev,
struct atmel_nand_host *host)
{
struct mtd_info *mtd = &host->mtd;
struct nand_chip *nand_chip = &host->nand_chip;
struct resource *regs;
regs = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 1);
if (!regs) {
dev_err(host->dev,
"Can't get I/O resource regs, use software ECC\n");
nand_chip->ecc.mode = NAND_ECC_SOFT;
return 0;
}
host->ecc = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, regs);
if (IS_ERR(host->ecc)) {
dev_err(host->dev, "ioremap failed\n");
return PTR_ERR(host->ecc);
}
/* ECC is calculated for the whole page (1 step) */
nand_chip->ecc.size = mtd->writesize;
/* set ECC page size and oob layout */
switch (mtd->writesize) {
case 512:
nand_chip->ecc.layout = &atmel_oobinfo_small;
ecc_writel(host->ecc, MR, ATMEL_ECC_PAGESIZE_528);
break;
case 1024:
nand_chip->ecc.layout = &atmel_oobinfo_large;
ecc_writel(host->ecc, MR, ATMEL_ECC_PAGESIZE_1056);
break;
case 2048:
nand_chip->ecc.layout = &atmel_oobinfo_large;
ecc_writel(host->ecc, MR, ATMEL_ECC_PAGESIZE_2112);
break;
case 4096:
nand_chip->ecc.layout = &atmel_oobinfo_large;
ecc_writel(host->ecc, MR, ATMEL_ECC_PAGESIZE_4224);
break;
default:
/* page size not handled by HW ECC */
/* switching back to soft ECC */
nand_chip->ecc.mode = NAND_ECC_SOFT;
return 0;
}
/* set up for HW ECC */
nand_chip->ecc.calculate = atmel_nand_calculate;
nand_chip->ecc.correct = atmel_nand_correct;
nand_chip->ecc.hwctl = atmel_nand_hwctl;
nand_chip->ecc.read_page = atmel_nand_read_page;
nand_chip->ecc.bytes = 4;
nand_chip->ecc.strength = 1;
return 0;
}
mtd: atmel_nand: add Nand Flash Controller (NFC) support Nand Flash Controller (NFC) can handle automatic transfers, sending the commands and address cycles to the NAND Flash. To use NFC in this driver, user needs to add NFC child node in nand flash driver. The NFC child node includes NFC's compatible string and regiters of the address and size of NFC command registers, NFC registers (embedded in HSMC) and NFC SRAM. Also user need to set up the HSMC irq, which use to check whether nfc command is finish or not. This driver has been tested on SAMA5D3X-EK board with JFFS2, YAFFS, UBIFS and mtd-utils. I put the part of the mtd_speedtest result here for your information. >From the mtd_speedtest, we can see the NFC will reduce the %50 of cpu load when writing nand flash. No change when reading. In the meantime, the speed will be slow about %8. - commands use to test: #insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 & #top -n 30 -d 1 | grep speedtest - test result: Before the patch: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 515 495 root R 1164 0% 93% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 99% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock write speed is 5768 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 92% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 5932 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page write speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page write speed is 5770 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 89% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 5910 KiB/s After the patch: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock write speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 49% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 50% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 47% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock write speed is 5370 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 92% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 95% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 5715 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page write speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 48% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 47% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 50% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page write speed is 5224 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 89% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 93% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 5641 KiB/s Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2013-08-05 19:14:35 +08:00
/* SMC interrupt service routine */
static irqreturn_t hsmc_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
{
struct atmel_nand_host *host = dev_id;
u32 status, mask, pending;
irqreturn_t ret = IRQ_HANDLED;
status = nfc_readl(host->nfc->hsmc_regs, SR);
mask = nfc_readl(host->nfc->hsmc_regs, IMR);
pending = status & mask;
if (pending & NFC_SR_XFR_DONE) {
complete(&host->nfc->comp_nfc);
nfc_writel(host->nfc->hsmc_regs, IDR, NFC_SR_XFR_DONE);
} else if (pending & NFC_SR_RB_EDGE) {
complete(&host->nfc->comp_nfc);
nfc_writel(host->nfc->hsmc_regs, IDR, NFC_SR_RB_EDGE);
} else if (pending & NFC_SR_CMD_DONE) {
complete(&host->nfc->comp_nfc);
nfc_writel(host->nfc->hsmc_regs, IDR, NFC_SR_CMD_DONE);
} else {
ret = IRQ_NONE;
}
return ret;
}
/* NFC(Nand Flash Controller) related functions */
static int nfc_wait_interrupt(struct atmel_nand_host *host, u32 flag)
{
unsigned long timeout;
init_completion(&host->nfc->comp_nfc);
/* Enable interrupt that need to wait for */
nfc_writel(host->nfc->hsmc_regs, IER, flag);
timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(&host->nfc->comp_nfc,
msecs_to_jiffies(NFC_TIME_OUT_MS));
if (timeout)
return 0;
/* Time out to wait for the interrupt */
dev_err(host->dev, "Time out to wait for interrupt: 0x%08x\n", flag);
return -ETIMEDOUT;
}
static int nfc_send_command(struct atmel_nand_host *host,
unsigned int cmd, unsigned int addr, unsigned char cycle0)
{
unsigned long timeout;
dev_dbg(host->dev,
"nfc_cmd: 0x%08x, addr1234: 0x%08x, cycle0: 0x%02x\n",
cmd, addr, cycle0);
timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(NFC_TIME_OUT_MS);
while (nfc_cmd_readl(NFCADDR_CMD_NFCBUSY, host->nfc->base_cmd_regs)
& NFCADDR_CMD_NFCBUSY) {
if (time_after(jiffies, timeout)) {
dev_err(host->dev,
"Time out to wait CMD_NFCBUSY ready!\n");
return -ETIMEDOUT;
}
}
nfc_writel(host->nfc->hsmc_regs, CYCLE0, cycle0);
nfc_cmd_addr1234_writel(cmd, addr, host->nfc->base_cmd_regs);
return nfc_wait_interrupt(host, NFC_SR_CMD_DONE);
}
static int nfc_device_ready(struct mtd_info *mtd)
{
struct nand_chip *nand_chip = mtd->priv;
struct atmel_nand_host *host = nand_chip->priv;
if (!nfc_wait_interrupt(host, NFC_SR_RB_EDGE))
return 1;
return 0;
}
static void nfc_select_chip(struct mtd_info *mtd, int chip)
{
struct nand_chip *nand_chip = mtd->priv;
struct atmel_nand_host *host = nand_chip->priv;
if (chip == -1)
nfc_writel(host->nfc->hsmc_regs, CTRL, NFC_CTRL_DISABLE);
else
nfc_writel(host->nfc->hsmc_regs, CTRL, NFC_CTRL_ENABLE);
}
static int nfc_make_addr(struct mtd_info *mtd, int column, int page_addr,
unsigned int *addr1234, unsigned int *cycle0)
{
struct nand_chip *chip = mtd->priv;
int acycle = 0;
unsigned char addr_bytes[8];
int index = 0, bit_shift;
BUG_ON(addr1234 == NULL || cycle0 == NULL);
*cycle0 = 0;
*addr1234 = 0;
if (column != -1) {
if (chip->options & NAND_BUSWIDTH_16)
column >>= 1;
addr_bytes[acycle++] = column & 0xff;
if (mtd->writesize > 512)
addr_bytes[acycle++] = (column >> 8) & 0xff;
}
if (page_addr != -1) {
addr_bytes[acycle++] = page_addr & 0xff;
addr_bytes[acycle++] = (page_addr >> 8) & 0xff;
if (chip->chipsize > (128 << 20))
addr_bytes[acycle++] = (page_addr >> 16) & 0xff;
}
if (acycle > 4)
*cycle0 = addr_bytes[index++];
for (bit_shift = 0; index < acycle; bit_shift += 8)
*addr1234 += addr_bytes[index++] << bit_shift;
/* return acycle in cmd register */
return acycle << NFCADDR_CMD_ACYCLE_BIT_POS;
}
static void nfc_nand_command(struct mtd_info *mtd, unsigned int command,
int column, int page_addr)
{
struct nand_chip *chip = mtd->priv;
struct atmel_nand_host *host = chip->priv;
unsigned long timeout;
unsigned int nfc_addr_cmd = 0;
unsigned int cmd1 = command << NFCADDR_CMD_CMD1_BIT_POS;
/* Set default settings: no cmd2, no addr cycle. read from nand */
unsigned int cmd2 = 0;
unsigned int vcmd2 = 0;
int acycle = NFCADDR_CMD_ACYCLE_NONE;
int csid = NFCADDR_CMD_CSID_3;
int dataen = NFCADDR_CMD_DATADIS;
int nfcwr = NFCADDR_CMD_NFCRD;
unsigned int addr1234 = 0;
unsigned int cycle0 = 0;
bool do_addr = true;
mtd: atmel_nand: enable Nand Flash Controller (NFC) read data via sram NFC has embedded sram which can use to transfer data. This patch enable reading nand flash via NFC SRAM. It will minimize the CPU overhead. This driver has been tested on SAMA5D3X-EK with JFFS2, YAFFS2, UBIFS and mtd-utils. Here puts the part of mtd_speedtest (read test) result as following: Compare with non-NFC mtd_speedtest result, reading will reduce %45 cpu load with increase %80 speed. - commands use to test: # insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 & # top -n 30 -d 1 | grep speedtest - test result: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 28% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 25% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 26% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 9403 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 31% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 57% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 53% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 71% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 9258 KiB/s Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com> Acked-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2013-08-05 19:14:36 +08:00
host->nfc->data_in_sram = NULL;
mtd: atmel_nand: add Nand Flash Controller (NFC) support Nand Flash Controller (NFC) can handle automatic transfers, sending the commands and address cycles to the NAND Flash. To use NFC in this driver, user needs to add NFC child node in nand flash driver. The NFC child node includes NFC's compatible string and regiters of the address and size of NFC command registers, NFC registers (embedded in HSMC) and NFC SRAM. Also user need to set up the HSMC irq, which use to check whether nfc command is finish or not. This driver has been tested on SAMA5D3X-EK board with JFFS2, YAFFS, UBIFS and mtd-utils. I put the part of the mtd_speedtest result here for your information. >From the mtd_speedtest, we can see the NFC will reduce the %50 of cpu load when writing nand flash. No change when reading. In the meantime, the speed will be slow about %8. - commands use to test: #insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 & #top -n 30 -d 1 | grep speedtest - test result: Before the patch: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 515 495 root R 1164 0% 93% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 99% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock write speed is 5768 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 92% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 5932 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page write speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page write speed is 5770 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 89% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 5910 KiB/s After the patch: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock write speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 49% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 50% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 47% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock write speed is 5370 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 92% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 95% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 5715 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page write speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 48% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 47% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 50% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page write speed is 5224 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 89% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 93% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 5641 KiB/s Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2013-08-05 19:14:35 +08:00
dev_dbg(host->dev, "%s: cmd = 0x%02x, col = 0x%08x, page = 0x%08x\n",
__func__, command, column, page_addr);
switch (command) {
case NAND_CMD_RESET:
nfc_addr_cmd = cmd1 | acycle | csid | dataen | nfcwr;
nfc_send_command(host, nfc_addr_cmd, addr1234, cycle0);
udelay(chip->chip_delay);
nfc_nand_command(mtd, NAND_CMD_STATUS, -1, -1);
timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(NFC_TIME_OUT_MS);
while (!(chip->read_byte(mtd) & NAND_STATUS_READY)) {
if (time_after(jiffies, timeout)) {
dev_err(host->dev,
"Time out to wait status ready!\n");
break;
}
}
return;
case NAND_CMD_STATUS:
do_addr = false;
break;
case NAND_CMD_PARAM:
case NAND_CMD_READID:
do_addr = false;
acycle = NFCADDR_CMD_ACYCLE_1;
if (column != -1)
addr1234 = column;
break;
case NAND_CMD_RNDOUT:
cmd2 = NAND_CMD_RNDOUTSTART << NFCADDR_CMD_CMD2_BIT_POS;
vcmd2 = NFCADDR_CMD_VCMD2;
break;
case NAND_CMD_READ0:
case NAND_CMD_READOOB:
if (command == NAND_CMD_READOOB) {
column += mtd->writesize;
command = NAND_CMD_READ0; /* only READ0 is valid */
cmd1 = command << NFCADDR_CMD_CMD1_BIT_POS;
}
mtd: atmel_nand: enable Nand Flash Controller (NFC) read data via sram NFC has embedded sram which can use to transfer data. This patch enable reading nand flash via NFC SRAM. It will minimize the CPU overhead. This driver has been tested on SAMA5D3X-EK with JFFS2, YAFFS2, UBIFS and mtd-utils. Here puts the part of mtd_speedtest (read test) result as following: Compare with non-NFC mtd_speedtest result, reading will reduce %45 cpu load with increase %80 speed. - commands use to test: # insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 & # top -n 30 -d 1 | grep speedtest - test result: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 28% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 25% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 26% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 9403 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 31% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 57% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 53% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 71% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 9258 KiB/s Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com> Acked-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2013-08-05 19:14:36 +08:00
if (host->nfc->use_nfc_sram) {
/* Enable Data transfer to sram */
dataen = NFCADDR_CMD_DATAEN;
/* Need enable PMECC now, since NFC will transfer
* data in bus after sending nfc read command.
*/
if (chip->ecc.mode == NAND_ECC_HW && host->has_pmecc)
pmecc_enable(host, NAND_ECC_READ);
}
mtd: atmel_nand: add Nand Flash Controller (NFC) support Nand Flash Controller (NFC) can handle automatic transfers, sending the commands and address cycles to the NAND Flash. To use NFC in this driver, user needs to add NFC child node in nand flash driver. The NFC child node includes NFC's compatible string and regiters of the address and size of NFC command registers, NFC registers (embedded in HSMC) and NFC SRAM. Also user need to set up the HSMC irq, which use to check whether nfc command is finish or not. This driver has been tested on SAMA5D3X-EK board with JFFS2, YAFFS, UBIFS and mtd-utils. I put the part of the mtd_speedtest result here for your information. >From the mtd_speedtest, we can see the NFC will reduce the %50 of cpu load when writing nand flash. No change when reading. In the meantime, the speed will be slow about %8. - commands use to test: #insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 & #top -n 30 -d 1 | grep speedtest - test result: Before the patch: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 515 495 root R 1164 0% 93% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 99% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock write speed is 5768 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 92% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 5932 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page write speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page write speed is 5770 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 89% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 5910 KiB/s After the patch: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock write speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 49% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 50% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 47% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock write speed is 5370 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 92% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 95% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 5715 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page write speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 48% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 47% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 50% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page write speed is 5224 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 89% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 93% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 5641 KiB/s Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2013-08-05 19:14:35 +08:00
cmd2 = NAND_CMD_READSTART << NFCADDR_CMD_CMD2_BIT_POS;
vcmd2 = NFCADDR_CMD_VCMD2;
break;
/* For prgramming command, the cmd need set to write enable */
case NAND_CMD_PAGEPROG:
case NAND_CMD_SEQIN:
case NAND_CMD_RNDIN:
nfcwr = NFCADDR_CMD_NFCWR;
mtd: atmel_nand: enable Nand Flash Controller (NFC) write via sram This patch enable writing nand flash via NFC SRAM. It will minimize the CPU overhead. The SRAM write only support ECC_NONE and ECC_HW with PMECC. To enable this NFC write by SRAM feature, you can add a string in dts under NFC driver node. This driver has been tested on SAMA5D3X-EK with JFFS2, YAFFS2, UBIFS and mtd-utils. Here is part of mtd_speedtest (writing test) result, compare with non-NFC writing, it reduces %65 cpu load with loss %12 speed. - commands use to test: # insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 & # top -n 30 -d 1 | grep speedtest - test result: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock write speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 7% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 8% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 5% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock write speed is 5194 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page write speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 32% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 27% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 25% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 30% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page write speed is 5024 KiB/s Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com> Acked-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2013-08-05 19:14:37 +08:00
if (host->nfc->will_write_sram && command == NAND_CMD_SEQIN)
dataen = NFCADDR_CMD_DATAEN;
mtd: atmel_nand: add Nand Flash Controller (NFC) support Nand Flash Controller (NFC) can handle automatic transfers, sending the commands and address cycles to the NAND Flash. To use NFC in this driver, user needs to add NFC child node in nand flash driver. The NFC child node includes NFC's compatible string and regiters of the address and size of NFC command registers, NFC registers (embedded in HSMC) and NFC SRAM. Also user need to set up the HSMC irq, which use to check whether nfc command is finish or not. This driver has been tested on SAMA5D3X-EK board with JFFS2, YAFFS, UBIFS and mtd-utils. I put the part of the mtd_speedtest result here for your information. >From the mtd_speedtest, we can see the NFC will reduce the %50 of cpu load when writing nand flash. No change when reading. In the meantime, the speed will be slow about %8. - commands use to test: #insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 & #top -n 30 -d 1 | grep speedtest - test result: Before the patch: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 515 495 root R 1164 0% 93% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 99% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock write speed is 5768 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 92% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 5932 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page write speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page write speed is 5770 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 89% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 5910 KiB/s After the patch: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock write speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 49% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 50% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 47% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock write speed is 5370 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 92% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 95% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 5715 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page write speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 48% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 47% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 50% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page write speed is 5224 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 89% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 93% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 5641 KiB/s Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2013-08-05 19:14:35 +08:00
break;
default:
break;
}
if (do_addr)
acycle = nfc_make_addr(mtd, column, page_addr, &addr1234,
&cycle0);
nfc_addr_cmd = cmd1 | cmd2 | vcmd2 | acycle | csid | dataen | nfcwr;
nfc_send_command(host, nfc_addr_cmd, addr1234, cycle0);
mtd: atmel_nand: enable Nand Flash Controller (NFC) read data via sram NFC has embedded sram which can use to transfer data. This patch enable reading nand flash via NFC SRAM. It will minimize the CPU overhead. This driver has been tested on SAMA5D3X-EK with JFFS2, YAFFS2, UBIFS and mtd-utils. Here puts the part of mtd_speedtest (read test) result as following: Compare with non-NFC mtd_speedtest result, reading will reduce %45 cpu load with increase %80 speed. - commands use to test: # insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 & # top -n 30 -d 1 | grep speedtest - test result: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 28% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 25% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 26% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 9403 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 31% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 57% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 53% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 71% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 9258 KiB/s Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com> Acked-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2013-08-05 19:14:36 +08:00
if (dataen == NFCADDR_CMD_DATAEN)
if (nfc_wait_interrupt(host, NFC_SR_XFR_DONE))
dev_err(host->dev, "something wrong, No XFR_DONE interrupt comes.\n");
mtd: atmel_nand: add Nand Flash Controller (NFC) support Nand Flash Controller (NFC) can handle automatic transfers, sending the commands and address cycles to the NAND Flash. To use NFC in this driver, user needs to add NFC child node in nand flash driver. The NFC child node includes NFC's compatible string and regiters of the address and size of NFC command registers, NFC registers (embedded in HSMC) and NFC SRAM. Also user need to set up the HSMC irq, which use to check whether nfc command is finish or not. This driver has been tested on SAMA5D3X-EK board with JFFS2, YAFFS, UBIFS and mtd-utils. I put the part of the mtd_speedtest result here for your information. >From the mtd_speedtest, we can see the NFC will reduce the %50 of cpu load when writing nand flash. No change when reading. In the meantime, the speed will be slow about %8. - commands use to test: #insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 & #top -n 30 -d 1 | grep speedtest - test result: Before the patch: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 515 495 root R 1164 0% 93% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 99% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock write speed is 5768 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 92% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 5932 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page write speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page write speed is 5770 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 89% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 5910 KiB/s After the patch: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock write speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 49% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 50% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 47% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock write speed is 5370 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 92% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 95% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 5715 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page write speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 48% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 47% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 50% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page write speed is 5224 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 89% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 93% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 5641 KiB/s Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2013-08-05 19:14:35 +08:00
/*
* Program and erase have their own busy handlers status, sequential
* in, and deplete1 need no delay.
*/
switch (command) {
case NAND_CMD_CACHEDPROG:
case NAND_CMD_PAGEPROG:
case NAND_CMD_ERASE1:
case NAND_CMD_ERASE2:
case NAND_CMD_RNDIN:
case NAND_CMD_STATUS:
case NAND_CMD_RNDOUT:
case NAND_CMD_SEQIN:
case NAND_CMD_READID:
return;
case NAND_CMD_READ0:
mtd: atmel_nand: enable Nand Flash Controller (NFC) read data via sram NFC has embedded sram which can use to transfer data. This patch enable reading nand flash via NFC SRAM. It will minimize the CPU overhead. This driver has been tested on SAMA5D3X-EK with JFFS2, YAFFS2, UBIFS and mtd-utils. Here puts the part of mtd_speedtest (read test) result as following: Compare with non-NFC mtd_speedtest result, reading will reduce %45 cpu load with increase %80 speed. - commands use to test: # insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 & # top -n 30 -d 1 | grep speedtest - test result: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 28% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 25% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 26% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 9403 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 31% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 57% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 53% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 71% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 9258 KiB/s Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com> Acked-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2013-08-05 19:14:36 +08:00
if (dataen == NFCADDR_CMD_DATAEN) {
host->nfc->data_in_sram = host->nfc->sram_bank0 +
nfc_get_sram_off(host);
return;
}
mtd: atmel_nand: add Nand Flash Controller (NFC) support Nand Flash Controller (NFC) can handle automatic transfers, sending the commands and address cycles to the NAND Flash. To use NFC in this driver, user needs to add NFC child node in nand flash driver. The NFC child node includes NFC's compatible string and regiters of the address and size of NFC command registers, NFC registers (embedded in HSMC) and NFC SRAM. Also user need to set up the HSMC irq, which use to check whether nfc command is finish or not. This driver has been tested on SAMA5D3X-EK board with JFFS2, YAFFS, UBIFS and mtd-utils. I put the part of the mtd_speedtest result here for your information. >From the mtd_speedtest, we can see the NFC will reduce the %50 of cpu load when writing nand flash. No change when reading. In the meantime, the speed will be slow about %8. - commands use to test: #insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 & #top -n 30 -d 1 | grep speedtest - test result: Before the patch: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 515 495 root R 1164 0% 93% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 99% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock write speed is 5768 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 92% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 5932 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page write speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page write speed is 5770 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 89% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 5910 KiB/s After the patch: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock write speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 49% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 50% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 47% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock write speed is 5370 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 92% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 95% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 5715 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page write speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 48% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 47% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 50% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page write speed is 5224 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 89% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 93% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 5641 KiB/s Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2013-08-05 19:14:35 +08:00
/* fall through */
default:
nfc_wait_interrupt(host, NFC_SR_RB_EDGE);
}
}
mtd: atmel_nand: enable Nand Flash Controller (NFC) write via sram This patch enable writing nand flash via NFC SRAM. It will minimize the CPU overhead. The SRAM write only support ECC_NONE and ECC_HW with PMECC. To enable this NFC write by SRAM feature, you can add a string in dts under NFC driver node. This driver has been tested on SAMA5D3X-EK with JFFS2, YAFFS2, UBIFS and mtd-utils. Here is part of mtd_speedtest (writing test) result, compare with non-NFC writing, it reduces %65 cpu load with loss %12 speed. - commands use to test: # insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 & # top -n 30 -d 1 | grep speedtest - test result: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock write speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 7% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 8% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 5% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock write speed is 5194 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page write speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 32% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 27% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 25% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 30% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page write speed is 5024 KiB/s Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com> Acked-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2013-08-05 19:14:37 +08:00
static int nfc_sram_write_page(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct nand_chip *chip,
uint32_t offset, int data_len, const uint8_t *buf,
int oob_required, int page, int cached, int raw)
{
int cfg, len;
int status = 0;
struct atmel_nand_host *host = chip->priv;
void __iomem *sram = host->nfc->sram_bank0 + nfc_get_sram_off(host);
/* Subpage write is not supported */
if (offset || (data_len < mtd->writesize))
return -EINVAL;
cfg = nfc_readl(host->nfc->hsmc_regs, CFG);
len = mtd->writesize;
if (unlikely(raw)) {
len += mtd->oobsize;
nfc_writel(host->nfc->hsmc_regs, CFG, cfg | NFC_CFG_WSPARE);
} else
nfc_writel(host->nfc->hsmc_regs, CFG, cfg & ~NFC_CFG_WSPARE);
/* Copy page data to sram that will write to nand via NFC */
if (use_dma) {
if (atmel_nand_dma_op(mtd, (void *)buf, len, 0) != 0)
/* Fall back to use cpu copy */
memcpy32_toio(sram, buf, len);
} else {
memcpy32_toio(sram, buf, len);
}
if (chip->ecc.mode == NAND_ECC_HW && host->has_pmecc)
/*
* When use NFC sram, need set up PMECC before send
* NAND_CMD_SEQIN command. Since when the nand command
* is sent, nfc will do transfer from sram and nand.
*/
pmecc_enable(host, NAND_ECC_WRITE);
host->nfc->will_write_sram = true;
chip->cmdfunc(mtd, NAND_CMD_SEQIN, 0x00, page);
host->nfc->will_write_sram = false;
if (likely(!raw))
/* Need to write ecc into oob */
status = chip->ecc.write_page(mtd, chip, buf, oob_required);
if (status < 0)
return status;
chip->cmdfunc(mtd, NAND_CMD_PAGEPROG, -1, -1);
status = chip->waitfunc(mtd, chip);
if ((status & NAND_STATUS_FAIL) && (chip->errstat))
status = chip->errstat(mtd, chip, FL_WRITING, status, page);
if (status & NAND_STATUS_FAIL)
return -EIO;
return 0;
}
mtd: atmel_nand: enable Nand Flash Controller (NFC) read data via sram NFC has embedded sram which can use to transfer data. This patch enable reading nand flash via NFC SRAM. It will minimize the CPU overhead. This driver has been tested on SAMA5D3X-EK with JFFS2, YAFFS2, UBIFS and mtd-utils. Here puts the part of mtd_speedtest (read test) result as following: Compare with non-NFC mtd_speedtest result, reading will reduce %45 cpu load with increase %80 speed. - commands use to test: # insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 & # top -n 30 -d 1 | grep speedtest - test result: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 28% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 25% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 26% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 9403 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 31% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 57% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 53% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 71% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 9258 KiB/s Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com> Acked-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2013-08-05 19:14:36 +08:00
static int nfc_sram_init(struct mtd_info *mtd)
{
struct nand_chip *chip = mtd->priv;
struct atmel_nand_host *host = chip->priv;
int res = 0;
/* Initialize the NFC CFG register */
unsigned int cfg_nfc = 0;
/* set page size and oob layout */
switch (mtd->writesize) {
case 512:
cfg_nfc = NFC_CFG_PAGESIZE_512;
break;
case 1024:
cfg_nfc = NFC_CFG_PAGESIZE_1024;
break;
case 2048:
cfg_nfc = NFC_CFG_PAGESIZE_2048;
break;
case 4096:
cfg_nfc = NFC_CFG_PAGESIZE_4096;
break;
case 8192:
cfg_nfc = NFC_CFG_PAGESIZE_8192;
break;
default:
dev_err(host->dev, "Unsupported page size for NFC.\n");
res = -ENXIO;
return res;
}
/* oob bytes size = (NFCSPARESIZE + 1) * 4
* Max support spare size is 512 bytes. */
cfg_nfc |= (((mtd->oobsize / 4) - 1) << NFC_CFG_NFC_SPARESIZE_BIT_POS
& NFC_CFG_NFC_SPARESIZE);
/* default set a max timeout */
cfg_nfc |= NFC_CFG_RSPARE |
NFC_CFG_NFC_DTOCYC | NFC_CFG_NFC_DTOMUL;
nfc_writel(host->nfc->hsmc_regs, CFG, cfg_nfc);
mtd: atmel_nand: enable Nand Flash Controller (NFC) write via sram This patch enable writing nand flash via NFC SRAM. It will minimize the CPU overhead. The SRAM write only support ECC_NONE and ECC_HW with PMECC. To enable this NFC write by SRAM feature, you can add a string in dts under NFC driver node. This driver has been tested on SAMA5D3X-EK with JFFS2, YAFFS2, UBIFS and mtd-utils. Here is part of mtd_speedtest (writing test) result, compare with non-NFC writing, it reduces %65 cpu load with loss %12 speed. - commands use to test: # insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 & # top -n 30 -d 1 | grep speedtest - test result: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock write speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 7% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 8% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 5% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock write speed is 5194 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page write speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 32% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 27% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 25% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 30% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page write speed is 5024 KiB/s Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com> Acked-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2013-08-05 19:14:37 +08:00
host->nfc->will_write_sram = false;
mtd: atmel_nand: enable Nand Flash Controller (NFC) read data via sram NFC has embedded sram which can use to transfer data. This patch enable reading nand flash via NFC SRAM. It will minimize the CPU overhead. This driver has been tested on SAMA5D3X-EK with JFFS2, YAFFS2, UBIFS and mtd-utils. Here puts the part of mtd_speedtest (read test) result as following: Compare with non-NFC mtd_speedtest result, reading will reduce %45 cpu load with increase %80 speed. - commands use to test: # insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 & # top -n 30 -d 1 | grep speedtest - test result: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 28% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 25% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 26% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 9403 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 31% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 57% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 53% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 71% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 9258 KiB/s Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com> Acked-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2013-08-05 19:14:36 +08:00
nfc_set_sram_bank(host, 0);
mtd: atmel_nand: enable Nand Flash Controller (NFC) write via sram This patch enable writing nand flash via NFC SRAM. It will minimize the CPU overhead. The SRAM write only support ECC_NONE and ECC_HW with PMECC. To enable this NFC write by SRAM feature, you can add a string in dts under NFC driver node. This driver has been tested on SAMA5D3X-EK with JFFS2, YAFFS2, UBIFS and mtd-utils. Here is part of mtd_speedtest (writing test) result, compare with non-NFC writing, it reduces %65 cpu load with loss %12 speed. - commands use to test: # insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 & # top -n 30 -d 1 | grep speedtest - test result: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock write speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 7% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 8% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 5% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock write speed is 5194 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page write speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 32% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 27% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 25% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 30% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page write speed is 5024 KiB/s Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com> Acked-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2013-08-05 19:14:37 +08:00
/* Use Write page with NFC SRAM only for PMECC or ECC NONE. */
if (host->nfc->write_by_sram) {
if ((chip->ecc.mode == NAND_ECC_HW && host->has_pmecc) ||
chip->ecc.mode == NAND_ECC_NONE)
chip->write_page = nfc_sram_write_page;
else
host->nfc->write_by_sram = false;
}
mtd: atmel_nand: enable Nand Flash Controller (NFC) read data via sram NFC has embedded sram which can use to transfer data. This patch enable reading nand flash via NFC SRAM. It will minimize the CPU overhead. This driver has been tested on SAMA5D3X-EK with JFFS2, YAFFS2, UBIFS and mtd-utils. Here puts the part of mtd_speedtest (read test) result as following: Compare with non-NFC mtd_speedtest result, reading will reduce %45 cpu load with increase %80 speed. - commands use to test: # insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 & # top -n 30 -d 1 | grep speedtest - test result: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 28% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 25% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 26% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 9403 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 31% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 57% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 53% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 71% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 9258 KiB/s Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com> Acked-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2013-08-05 19:14:36 +08:00
mtd: atmel_nand: enable Nand Flash Controller (NFC) write via sram This patch enable writing nand flash via NFC SRAM. It will minimize the CPU overhead. The SRAM write only support ECC_NONE and ECC_HW with PMECC. To enable this NFC write by SRAM feature, you can add a string in dts under NFC driver node. This driver has been tested on SAMA5D3X-EK with JFFS2, YAFFS2, UBIFS and mtd-utils. Here is part of mtd_speedtest (writing test) result, compare with non-NFC writing, it reduces %65 cpu load with loss %12 speed. - commands use to test: # insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 & # top -n 30 -d 1 | grep speedtest - test result: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock write speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 7% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 8% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 5% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock write speed is 5194 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page write speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 32% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 27% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 25% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 30% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page write speed is 5024 KiB/s Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com> Acked-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2013-08-05 19:14:37 +08:00
dev_info(host->dev, "Using NFC Sram read %s\n",
host->nfc->write_by_sram ? "and write" : "");
mtd: atmel_nand: enable Nand Flash Controller (NFC) read data via sram NFC has embedded sram which can use to transfer data. This patch enable reading nand flash via NFC SRAM. It will minimize the CPU overhead. This driver has been tested on SAMA5D3X-EK with JFFS2, YAFFS2, UBIFS and mtd-utils. Here puts the part of mtd_speedtest (read test) result as following: Compare with non-NFC mtd_speedtest result, reading will reduce %45 cpu load with increase %80 speed. - commands use to test: # insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 & # top -n 30 -d 1 | grep speedtest - test result: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 28% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 25% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 26% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 9403 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 31% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 57% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 53% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 71% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 9258 KiB/s Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com> Acked-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2013-08-05 19:14:36 +08:00
return 0;
}
mtd: atmel_nand: add Nand Flash Controller (NFC) support Nand Flash Controller (NFC) can handle automatic transfers, sending the commands and address cycles to the NAND Flash. To use NFC in this driver, user needs to add NFC child node in nand flash driver. The NFC child node includes NFC's compatible string and regiters of the address and size of NFC command registers, NFC registers (embedded in HSMC) and NFC SRAM. Also user need to set up the HSMC irq, which use to check whether nfc command is finish or not. This driver has been tested on SAMA5D3X-EK board with JFFS2, YAFFS, UBIFS and mtd-utils. I put the part of the mtd_speedtest result here for your information. >From the mtd_speedtest, we can see the NFC will reduce the %50 of cpu load when writing nand flash. No change when reading. In the meantime, the speed will be slow about %8. - commands use to test: #insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 & #top -n 30 -d 1 | grep speedtest - test result: Before the patch: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 515 495 root R 1164 0% 93% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 99% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock write speed is 5768 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 92% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 5932 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page write speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page write speed is 5770 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 89% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 5910 KiB/s After the patch: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock write speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 49% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 50% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 47% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock write speed is 5370 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 92% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 95% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 5715 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page write speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 48% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 47% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 50% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page write speed is 5224 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 89% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 93% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 5641 KiB/s Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2013-08-05 19:14:35 +08:00
static struct platform_driver atmel_nand_nfc_driver;
/*
* Probe for the NAND device.
*/
static int __init atmel_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct atmel_nand_host *host;
struct mtd_info *mtd;
struct nand_chip *nand_chip;
struct resource *mem;
struct mtd_part_parser_data ppdata = {};
mtd: atmel_nand: add Nand Flash Controller (NFC) support Nand Flash Controller (NFC) can handle automatic transfers, sending the commands and address cycles to the NAND Flash. To use NFC in this driver, user needs to add NFC child node in nand flash driver. The NFC child node includes NFC's compatible string and regiters of the address and size of NFC command registers, NFC registers (embedded in HSMC) and NFC SRAM. Also user need to set up the HSMC irq, which use to check whether nfc command is finish or not. This driver has been tested on SAMA5D3X-EK board with JFFS2, YAFFS, UBIFS and mtd-utils. I put the part of the mtd_speedtest result here for your information. >From the mtd_speedtest, we can see the NFC will reduce the %50 of cpu load when writing nand flash. No change when reading. In the meantime, the speed will be slow about %8. - commands use to test: #insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 & #top -n 30 -d 1 | grep speedtest - test result: Before the patch: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 515 495 root R 1164 0% 93% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 99% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock write speed is 5768 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 92% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 5932 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page write speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page write speed is 5770 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 89% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 5910 KiB/s After the patch: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock write speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 49% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 50% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 47% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock write speed is 5370 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 92% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 95% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 5715 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page write speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 48% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 47% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 50% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page write speed is 5224 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 89% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 93% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 5641 KiB/s Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2013-08-05 19:14:35 +08:00
int res, irq;
/* Allocate memory for the device structure (and zero it) */
host = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*host), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!host) {
printk(KERN_ERR "atmel_nand: failed to allocate device structure.\n");
return -ENOMEM;
}
mtd: atmel_nand: add Nand Flash Controller (NFC) support Nand Flash Controller (NFC) can handle automatic transfers, sending the commands and address cycles to the NAND Flash. To use NFC in this driver, user needs to add NFC child node in nand flash driver. The NFC child node includes NFC's compatible string and regiters of the address and size of NFC command registers, NFC registers (embedded in HSMC) and NFC SRAM. Also user need to set up the HSMC irq, which use to check whether nfc command is finish or not. This driver has been tested on SAMA5D3X-EK board with JFFS2, YAFFS, UBIFS and mtd-utils. I put the part of the mtd_speedtest result here for your information. >From the mtd_speedtest, we can see the NFC will reduce the %50 of cpu load when writing nand flash. No change when reading. In the meantime, the speed will be slow about %8. - commands use to test: #insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 & #top -n 30 -d 1 | grep speedtest - test result: Before the patch: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 515 495 root R 1164 0% 93% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 99% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock write speed is 5768 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 92% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 5932 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page write speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page write speed is 5770 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 89% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 5910 KiB/s After the patch: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock write speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 49% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 50% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 47% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock write speed is 5370 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 92% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 95% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 5715 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page write speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 48% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 47% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 50% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page write speed is 5224 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 89% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 93% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 5641 KiB/s Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2013-08-05 19:14:35 +08:00
res = platform_driver_register(&atmel_nand_nfc_driver);
if (res)
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "atmel_nand: can't register NFC driver\n");
mem = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
host->io_base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, mem);
if (IS_ERR(host->io_base)) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "atmel_nand: ioremap resource failed\n");
res = PTR_ERR(host->io_base);
goto err_nand_ioremap;
}
host->io_phys = (dma_addr_t)mem->start;
mtd = &host->mtd;
nand_chip = &host->nand_chip;
host->dev = &pdev->dev;
if (pdev->dev.of_node) {
res = atmel_of_init_port(host, pdev->dev.of_node);
if (res)
goto err_nand_ioremap;
} else {
memcpy(&host->board, pdev->dev.platform_data,
sizeof(struct atmel_nand_data));
}
nand_chip->priv = host; /* link the private data structures */
mtd->priv = nand_chip;
mtd->owner = THIS_MODULE;
/* Set address of NAND IO lines */
nand_chip->IO_ADDR_R = host->io_base;
nand_chip->IO_ADDR_W = host->io_base;
mtd: atmel_nand: add Nand Flash Controller (NFC) support Nand Flash Controller (NFC) can handle automatic transfers, sending the commands and address cycles to the NAND Flash. To use NFC in this driver, user needs to add NFC child node in nand flash driver. The NFC child node includes NFC's compatible string and regiters of the address and size of NFC command registers, NFC registers (embedded in HSMC) and NFC SRAM. Also user need to set up the HSMC irq, which use to check whether nfc command is finish or not. This driver has been tested on SAMA5D3X-EK board with JFFS2, YAFFS, UBIFS and mtd-utils. I put the part of the mtd_speedtest result here for your information. >From the mtd_speedtest, we can see the NFC will reduce the %50 of cpu load when writing nand flash. No change when reading. In the meantime, the speed will be slow about %8. - commands use to test: #insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 & #top -n 30 -d 1 | grep speedtest - test result: Before the patch: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 515 495 root R 1164 0% 93% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 99% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock write speed is 5768 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 92% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 5932 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page write speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page write speed is 5770 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 89% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 5910 KiB/s After the patch: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock write speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 49% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 50% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 47% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock write speed is 5370 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 92% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 95% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 5715 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page write speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 48% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 47% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 50% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page write speed is 5224 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 89% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 93% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 5641 KiB/s Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2013-08-05 19:14:35 +08:00
if (nand_nfc.is_initialized) {
/* NFC driver is probed and initialized */
host->nfc = &nand_nfc;
mtd: atmel_nand: add Nand Flash Controller (NFC) support Nand Flash Controller (NFC) can handle automatic transfers, sending the commands and address cycles to the NAND Flash. To use NFC in this driver, user needs to add NFC child node in nand flash driver. The NFC child node includes NFC's compatible string and regiters of the address and size of NFC command registers, NFC registers (embedded in HSMC) and NFC SRAM. Also user need to set up the HSMC irq, which use to check whether nfc command is finish or not. This driver has been tested on SAMA5D3X-EK board with JFFS2, YAFFS, UBIFS and mtd-utils. I put the part of the mtd_speedtest result here for your information. >From the mtd_speedtest, we can see the NFC will reduce the %50 of cpu load when writing nand flash. No change when reading. In the meantime, the speed will be slow about %8. - commands use to test: #insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 & #top -n 30 -d 1 | grep speedtest - test result: Before the patch: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 515 495 root R 1164 0% 93% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 99% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock write speed is 5768 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 92% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 5932 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page write speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page write speed is 5770 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 89% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 5910 KiB/s After the patch: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock write speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 49% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 50% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 47% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock write speed is 5370 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 92% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 95% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 5715 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page write speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 48% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 47% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 50% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page write speed is 5224 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 89% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 93% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 5641 KiB/s Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2013-08-05 19:14:35 +08:00
nand_chip->select_chip = nfc_select_chip;
nand_chip->dev_ready = nfc_device_ready;
nand_chip->cmdfunc = nfc_nand_command;
mtd: atmel_nand: add Nand Flash Controller (NFC) support Nand Flash Controller (NFC) can handle automatic transfers, sending the commands and address cycles to the NAND Flash. To use NFC in this driver, user needs to add NFC child node in nand flash driver. The NFC child node includes NFC's compatible string and regiters of the address and size of NFC command registers, NFC registers (embedded in HSMC) and NFC SRAM. Also user need to set up the HSMC irq, which use to check whether nfc command is finish or not. This driver has been tested on SAMA5D3X-EK board with JFFS2, YAFFS, UBIFS and mtd-utils. I put the part of the mtd_speedtest result here for your information. >From the mtd_speedtest, we can see the NFC will reduce the %50 of cpu load when writing nand flash. No change when reading. In the meantime, the speed will be slow about %8. - commands use to test: #insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 & #top -n 30 -d 1 | grep speedtest - test result: Before the patch: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 515 495 root R 1164 0% 93% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 99% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock write speed is 5768 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 92% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 5932 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page write speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page write speed is 5770 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 89% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 5910 KiB/s After the patch: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock write speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 49% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 50% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 47% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock write speed is 5370 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 92% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 95% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 5715 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page write speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 48% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 47% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 50% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page write speed is 5224 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 89% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 93% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 5641 KiB/s Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2013-08-05 19:14:35 +08:00
/* Initialize the interrupt for NFC */
irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
if (irq < 0) {
dev_err(host->dev, "Cannot get HSMC irq!\n");
goto err_nand_ioremap;
}
mtd: atmel_nand: add Nand Flash Controller (NFC) support Nand Flash Controller (NFC) can handle automatic transfers, sending the commands and address cycles to the NAND Flash. To use NFC in this driver, user needs to add NFC child node in nand flash driver. The NFC child node includes NFC's compatible string and regiters of the address and size of NFC command registers, NFC registers (embedded in HSMC) and NFC SRAM. Also user need to set up the HSMC irq, which use to check whether nfc command is finish or not. This driver has been tested on SAMA5D3X-EK board with JFFS2, YAFFS, UBIFS and mtd-utils. I put the part of the mtd_speedtest result here for your information. >From the mtd_speedtest, we can see the NFC will reduce the %50 of cpu load when writing nand flash. No change when reading. In the meantime, the speed will be slow about %8. - commands use to test: #insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 & #top -n 30 -d 1 | grep speedtest - test result: Before the patch: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 515 495 root R 1164 0% 93% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 99% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock write speed is 5768 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 92% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 5932 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page write speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page write speed is 5770 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 89% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 5910 KiB/s After the patch: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock write speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 49% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 50% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 47% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock write speed is 5370 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 92% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 95% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 5715 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page write speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 48% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 47% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 50% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page write speed is 5224 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 89% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 93% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 5641 KiB/s Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2013-08-05 19:14:35 +08:00
res = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, hsmc_interrupt,
0, "hsmc", host);
if (res) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Unable to request HSMC irq %d\n",
irq);
goto err_nand_ioremap;
}
mtd: atmel_nand: add Nand Flash Controller (NFC) support Nand Flash Controller (NFC) can handle automatic transfers, sending the commands and address cycles to the NAND Flash. To use NFC in this driver, user needs to add NFC child node in nand flash driver. The NFC child node includes NFC's compatible string and regiters of the address and size of NFC command registers, NFC registers (embedded in HSMC) and NFC SRAM. Also user need to set up the HSMC irq, which use to check whether nfc command is finish or not. This driver has been tested on SAMA5D3X-EK board with JFFS2, YAFFS, UBIFS and mtd-utils. I put the part of the mtd_speedtest result here for your information. >From the mtd_speedtest, we can see the NFC will reduce the %50 of cpu load when writing nand flash. No change when reading. In the meantime, the speed will be slow about %8. - commands use to test: #insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 & #top -n 30 -d 1 | grep speedtest - test result: Before the patch: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 515 495 root R 1164 0% 93% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 99% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock write speed is 5768 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 92% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 5932 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page write speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page write speed is 5770 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 89% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 5910 KiB/s After the patch: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock write speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 49% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 50% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 47% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock write speed is 5370 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 92% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 95% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 5715 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page write speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 48% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 47% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 50% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page write speed is 5224 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 89% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 93% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 5641 KiB/s Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2013-08-05 19:14:35 +08:00
} else {
res = atmel_nand_set_enable_ready_pins(mtd);
if (res)
goto err_nand_ioremap;
nand_chip->cmd_ctrl = atmel_nand_cmd_ctrl;
}
nand_chip->ecc.mode = host->board.ecc_mode;
nand_chip->chip_delay = 20; /* 20us command delay time */
if (host->board.bus_width_16) /* 16-bit bus width */
nand_chip->options |= NAND_BUSWIDTH_16;
nand_chip->read_buf = atmel_read_buf;
nand_chip->write_buf = atmel_write_buf;
platform_set_drvdata(pdev, host);
atmel_nand_enable(host);
if (gpio_is_valid(host->board.det_pin)) {
res = devm_gpio_request(&pdev->dev,
host->board.det_pin, "nand_det");
if (res < 0) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev,
"can't request det gpio %d\n",
host->board.det_pin);
goto err_no_card;
}
res = gpio_direction_input(host->board.det_pin);
if (res < 0) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev,
"can't request input direction det gpio %d\n",
host->board.det_pin);
goto err_no_card;
}
if (gpio_get_value(host->board.det_pin)) {
printk(KERN_INFO "No SmartMedia card inserted.\n");
res = -ENXIO;
goto err_no_card;
}
}
if (host->board.on_flash_bbt || on_flash_bbt) {
printk(KERN_INFO "atmel_nand: Use On Flash BBT\n");
nand_chip->bbt_options |= NAND_BBT_USE_FLASH;
}
if (!host->board.has_dma)
use_dma = 0;
if (use_dma) {
dma_cap_mask_t mask;
dma_cap_zero(mask);
dma_cap_set(DMA_MEMCPY, mask);
host->dma_chan = dma_request_channel(mask, NULL, NULL);
if (!host->dma_chan) {
dev_err(host->dev, "Failed to request DMA channel\n");
use_dma = 0;
}
}
if (use_dma)
dev_info(host->dev, "Using %s for DMA transfers.\n",
dma_chan_name(host->dma_chan));
else
dev_info(host->dev, "No DMA support for NAND access.\n");
/* first scan to find the device and get the page size */
if (nand_scan_ident(mtd, 1, NULL)) {
res = -ENXIO;
goto err_scan_ident;
}
if (nand_chip->ecc.mode == NAND_ECC_HW) {
if (host->has_pmecc)
res = atmel_pmecc_nand_init_params(pdev, host);
else
res = atmel_hw_nand_init_params(pdev, host);
if (res != 0)
goto err_hw_ecc;
}
mtd: atmel_nand: enable Nand Flash Controller (NFC) read data via sram NFC has embedded sram which can use to transfer data. This patch enable reading nand flash via NFC SRAM. It will minimize the CPU overhead. This driver has been tested on SAMA5D3X-EK with JFFS2, YAFFS2, UBIFS and mtd-utils. Here puts the part of mtd_speedtest (read test) result as following: Compare with non-NFC mtd_speedtest result, reading will reduce %45 cpu load with increase %80 speed. - commands use to test: # insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 & # top -n 30 -d 1 | grep speedtest - test result: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 28% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 25% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 26% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 9403 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 31% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 57% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 53% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 71% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 9258 KiB/s Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com> Acked-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2013-08-05 19:14:36 +08:00
/* initialize the nfc configuration register */
if (host->nfc && host->nfc->use_nfc_sram) {
res = nfc_sram_init(mtd);
if (res) {
host->nfc->use_nfc_sram = false;
dev_err(host->dev, "Disable use nfc sram for data transfer.\n");
}
}
/* second phase scan */
if (nand_scan_tail(mtd)) {
res = -ENXIO;
goto err_scan_tail;
}
mtd->name = "atmel_nand";
ppdata.of_node = pdev->dev.of_node;
res = mtd_device_parse_register(mtd, NULL, &ppdata,
host->board.parts, host->board.num_parts);
if (!res)
return res;
err_scan_tail:
if (host->has_pmecc && host->nand_chip.ecc.mode == NAND_ECC_HW)
pmecc_writel(host->ecc, CTRL, PMECC_CTRL_DISABLE);
err_hw_ecc:
err_scan_ident:
err_no_card:
atmel_nand_disable(host);
if (host->dma_chan)
dma_release_channel(host->dma_chan);
err_nand_ioremap:
mtd: atmel_nand: add Nand Flash Controller (NFC) support Nand Flash Controller (NFC) can handle automatic transfers, sending the commands and address cycles to the NAND Flash. To use NFC in this driver, user needs to add NFC child node in nand flash driver. The NFC child node includes NFC's compatible string and regiters of the address and size of NFC command registers, NFC registers (embedded in HSMC) and NFC SRAM. Also user need to set up the HSMC irq, which use to check whether nfc command is finish or not. This driver has been tested on SAMA5D3X-EK board with JFFS2, YAFFS, UBIFS and mtd-utils. I put the part of the mtd_speedtest result here for your information. >From the mtd_speedtest, we can see the NFC will reduce the %50 of cpu load when writing nand flash. No change when reading. In the meantime, the speed will be slow about %8. - commands use to test: #insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 & #top -n 30 -d 1 | grep speedtest - test result: Before the patch: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 515 495 root R 1164 0% 93% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 99% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock write speed is 5768 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 92% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 5932 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page write speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page write speed is 5770 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 89% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 5910 KiB/s After the patch: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock write speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 49% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 50% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 47% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock write speed is 5370 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 92% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 95% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 5715 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page write speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 48% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 47% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 50% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page write speed is 5224 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 89% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 93% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 5641 KiB/s Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2013-08-05 19:14:35 +08:00
platform_driver_unregister(&atmel_nand_nfc_driver);
return res;
}
/*
* Remove a NAND device.
*/
static int __exit atmel_nand_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct atmel_nand_host *host = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
struct mtd_info *mtd = &host->mtd;
nand_release(mtd);
atmel_nand_disable(host);
if (host->has_pmecc && host->nand_chip.ecc.mode == NAND_ECC_HW) {
pmecc_writel(host->ecc, CTRL, PMECC_CTRL_DISABLE);
pmerrloc_writel(host->pmerrloc_base, ELDIS,
PMERRLOC_DISABLE);
}
if (host->dma_chan)
dma_release_channel(host->dma_chan);
mtd: atmel_nand: add Nand Flash Controller (NFC) support Nand Flash Controller (NFC) can handle automatic transfers, sending the commands and address cycles to the NAND Flash. To use NFC in this driver, user needs to add NFC child node in nand flash driver. The NFC child node includes NFC's compatible string and regiters of the address and size of NFC command registers, NFC registers (embedded in HSMC) and NFC SRAM. Also user need to set up the HSMC irq, which use to check whether nfc command is finish or not. This driver has been tested on SAMA5D3X-EK board with JFFS2, YAFFS, UBIFS and mtd-utils. I put the part of the mtd_speedtest result here for your information. >From the mtd_speedtest, we can see the NFC will reduce the %50 of cpu load when writing nand flash. No change when reading. In the meantime, the speed will be slow about %8. - commands use to test: #insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 & #top -n 30 -d 1 | grep speedtest - test result: Before the patch: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 515 495 root R 1164 0% 93% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 99% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock write speed is 5768 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 92% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 5932 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page write speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page write speed is 5770 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 89% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 5910 KiB/s After the patch: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock write speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 49% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 50% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 47% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock write speed is 5370 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 92% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 95% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 5715 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page write speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 48% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 47% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 50% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page write speed is 5224 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 89% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 93% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 5641 KiB/s Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2013-08-05 19:14:35 +08:00
platform_driver_unregister(&atmel_nand_nfc_driver);
return 0;
}
#if defined(CONFIG_OF)
static const struct of_device_id atmel_nand_dt_ids[] = {
{ .compatible = "atmel,at91rm9200-nand" },
{ /* sentinel */ }
};
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, atmel_nand_dt_ids);
#endif
mtd: atmel_nand: add Nand Flash Controller (NFC) support Nand Flash Controller (NFC) can handle automatic transfers, sending the commands and address cycles to the NAND Flash. To use NFC in this driver, user needs to add NFC child node in nand flash driver. The NFC child node includes NFC's compatible string and regiters of the address and size of NFC command registers, NFC registers (embedded in HSMC) and NFC SRAM. Also user need to set up the HSMC irq, which use to check whether nfc command is finish or not. This driver has been tested on SAMA5D3X-EK board with JFFS2, YAFFS, UBIFS and mtd-utils. I put the part of the mtd_speedtest result here for your information. >From the mtd_speedtest, we can see the NFC will reduce the %50 of cpu load when writing nand flash. No change when reading. In the meantime, the speed will be slow about %8. - commands use to test: #insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 & #top -n 30 -d 1 | grep speedtest - test result: Before the patch: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 515 495 root R 1164 0% 93% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 99% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock write speed is 5768 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 92% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 5932 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page write speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page write speed is 5770 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 89% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 5910 KiB/s After the patch: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock write speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 49% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 50% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 47% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock write speed is 5370 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 92% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 95% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 5715 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page write speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 48% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 47% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 50% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page write speed is 5224 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 89% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 93% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 5641 KiB/s Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2013-08-05 19:14:35 +08:00
static int atmel_nand_nfc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct atmel_nfc *nfc = &nand_nfc;
struct resource *nfc_cmd_regs, *nfc_hsmc_regs, *nfc_sram;
nfc_cmd_regs = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
nfc->base_cmd_regs = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, nfc_cmd_regs);
if (IS_ERR(nfc->base_cmd_regs))
return PTR_ERR(nfc->base_cmd_regs);
nfc_hsmc_regs = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 1);
nfc->hsmc_regs = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, nfc_hsmc_regs);
if (IS_ERR(nfc->hsmc_regs))
return PTR_ERR(nfc->hsmc_regs);
nfc_sram = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 2);
if (nfc_sram) {
nfc->sram_bank0 = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, nfc_sram);
mtd: atmel_nand: enable Nand Flash Controller (NFC) read data via sram NFC has embedded sram which can use to transfer data. This patch enable reading nand flash via NFC SRAM. It will minimize the CPU overhead. This driver has been tested on SAMA5D3X-EK with JFFS2, YAFFS2, UBIFS and mtd-utils. Here puts the part of mtd_speedtest (read test) result as following: Compare with non-NFC mtd_speedtest result, reading will reduce %45 cpu load with increase %80 speed. - commands use to test: # insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 & # top -n 30 -d 1 | grep speedtest - test result: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 28% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 25% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 26% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 9403 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 31% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 57% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 53% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 71% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 9258 KiB/s Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com> Acked-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2013-08-05 19:14:36 +08:00
if (IS_ERR(nfc->sram_bank0)) {
mtd: atmel_nand: add Nand Flash Controller (NFC) support Nand Flash Controller (NFC) can handle automatic transfers, sending the commands and address cycles to the NAND Flash. To use NFC in this driver, user needs to add NFC child node in nand flash driver. The NFC child node includes NFC's compatible string and regiters of the address and size of NFC command registers, NFC registers (embedded in HSMC) and NFC SRAM. Also user need to set up the HSMC irq, which use to check whether nfc command is finish or not. This driver has been tested on SAMA5D3X-EK board with JFFS2, YAFFS, UBIFS and mtd-utils. I put the part of the mtd_speedtest result here for your information. >From the mtd_speedtest, we can see the NFC will reduce the %50 of cpu load when writing nand flash. No change when reading. In the meantime, the speed will be slow about %8. - commands use to test: #insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 & #top -n 30 -d 1 | grep speedtest - test result: Before the patch: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 515 495 root R 1164 0% 93% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 99% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock write speed is 5768 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 92% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 5932 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page write speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page write speed is 5770 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 89% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 5910 KiB/s After the patch: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock write speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 49% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 50% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 47% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock write speed is 5370 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 92% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 95% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 5715 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page write speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 48% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 47% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 50% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page write speed is 5224 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 89% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 93% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 5641 KiB/s Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2013-08-05 19:14:35 +08:00
dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "Fail to ioremap the NFC sram with error: %ld. So disable NFC sram.\n",
PTR_ERR(nfc->sram_bank0));
mtd: atmel_nand: enable Nand Flash Controller (NFC) read data via sram NFC has embedded sram which can use to transfer data. This patch enable reading nand flash via NFC SRAM. It will minimize the CPU overhead. This driver has been tested on SAMA5D3X-EK with JFFS2, YAFFS2, UBIFS and mtd-utils. Here puts the part of mtd_speedtest (read test) result as following: Compare with non-NFC mtd_speedtest result, reading will reduce %45 cpu load with increase %80 speed. - commands use to test: # insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 & # top -n 30 -d 1 | grep speedtest - test result: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 28% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 25% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 26% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 9403 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 31% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 57% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 53% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 71% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 9258 KiB/s Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com> Acked-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2013-08-05 19:14:36 +08:00
} else {
nfc->use_nfc_sram = true;
mtd: atmel_nand: add Nand Flash Controller (NFC) support Nand Flash Controller (NFC) can handle automatic transfers, sending the commands and address cycles to the NAND Flash. To use NFC in this driver, user needs to add NFC child node in nand flash driver. The NFC child node includes NFC's compatible string and regiters of the address and size of NFC command registers, NFC registers (embedded in HSMC) and NFC SRAM. Also user need to set up the HSMC irq, which use to check whether nfc command is finish or not. This driver has been tested on SAMA5D3X-EK board with JFFS2, YAFFS, UBIFS and mtd-utils. I put the part of the mtd_speedtest result here for your information. >From the mtd_speedtest, we can see the NFC will reduce the %50 of cpu load when writing nand flash. No change when reading. In the meantime, the speed will be slow about %8. - commands use to test: #insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 & #top -n 30 -d 1 | grep speedtest - test result: Before the patch: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 515 495 root R 1164 0% 93% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 99% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock write speed is 5768 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 92% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 5932 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page write speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page write speed is 5770 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 89% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 5910 KiB/s After the patch: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock write speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 49% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 50% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 47% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock write speed is 5370 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 92% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 95% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 5715 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page write speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 48% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 47% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 50% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page write speed is 5224 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 89% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 93% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 5641 KiB/s Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2013-08-05 19:14:35 +08:00
nfc->sram_bank0_phys = (dma_addr_t)nfc_sram->start;
mtd: atmel_nand: enable Nand Flash Controller (NFC) write via sram This patch enable writing nand flash via NFC SRAM. It will minimize the CPU overhead. The SRAM write only support ECC_NONE and ECC_HW with PMECC. To enable this NFC write by SRAM feature, you can add a string in dts under NFC driver node. This driver has been tested on SAMA5D3X-EK with JFFS2, YAFFS2, UBIFS and mtd-utils. Here is part of mtd_speedtest (writing test) result, compare with non-NFC writing, it reduces %65 cpu load with loss %12 speed. - commands use to test: # insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 & # top -n 30 -d 1 | grep speedtest - test result: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock write speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 7% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 8% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 5% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock write speed is 5194 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page write speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 32% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 27% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 25% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 30% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page write speed is 5024 KiB/s Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com> Acked-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2013-08-05 19:14:37 +08:00
if (pdev->dev.of_node)
nfc->write_by_sram = of_property_read_bool(
pdev->dev.of_node,
"atmel,write-by-sram");
mtd: atmel_nand: enable Nand Flash Controller (NFC) read data via sram NFC has embedded sram which can use to transfer data. This patch enable reading nand flash via NFC SRAM. It will minimize the CPU overhead. This driver has been tested on SAMA5D3X-EK with JFFS2, YAFFS2, UBIFS and mtd-utils. Here puts the part of mtd_speedtest (read test) result as following: Compare with non-NFC mtd_speedtest result, reading will reduce %45 cpu load with increase %80 speed. - commands use to test: # insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 & # top -n 30 -d 1 | grep speedtest - test result: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 28% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 25% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 26% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 9403 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 31% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 57% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 53% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 71% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 9258 KiB/s Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com> Acked-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2013-08-05 19:14:36 +08:00
}
mtd: atmel_nand: add Nand Flash Controller (NFC) support Nand Flash Controller (NFC) can handle automatic transfers, sending the commands and address cycles to the NAND Flash. To use NFC in this driver, user needs to add NFC child node in nand flash driver. The NFC child node includes NFC's compatible string and regiters of the address and size of NFC command registers, NFC registers (embedded in HSMC) and NFC SRAM. Also user need to set up the HSMC irq, which use to check whether nfc command is finish or not. This driver has been tested on SAMA5D3X-EK board with JFFS2, YAFFS, UBIFS and mtd-utils. I put the part of the mtd_speedtest result here for your information. >From the mtd_speedtest, we can see the NFC will reduce the %50 of cpu load when writing nand flash. No change when reading. In the meantime, the speed will be slow about %8. - commands use to test: #insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 & #top -n 30 -d 1 | grep speedtest - test result: Before the patch: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 515 495 root R 1164 0% 93% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 99% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock write speed is 5768 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 92% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 5932 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page write speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page write speed is 5770 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 89% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 5910 KiB/s After the patch: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock write speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 49% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 50% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 47% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock write speed is 5370 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 92% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 95% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 5715 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page write speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 48% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 47% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 50% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page write speed is 5224 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 89% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 93% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 5641 KiB/s Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2013-08-05 19:14:35 +08:00
}
nfc->is_initialized = true;
dev_info(&pdev->dev, "NFC is probed.\n");
return 0;
}
#if defined(CONFIG_OF)
mtd: atmel_nand: add Nand Flash Controller (NFC) support Nand Flash Controller (NFC) can handle automatic transfers, sending the commands and address cycles to the NAND Flash. To use NFC in this driver, user needs to add NFC child node in nand flash driver. The NFC child node includes NFC's compatible string and regiters of the address and size of NFC command registers, NFC registers (embedded in HSMC) and NFC SRAM. Also user need to set up the HSMC irq, which use to check whether nfc command is finish or not. This driver has been tested on SAMA5D3X-EK board with JFFS2, YAFFS, UBIFS and mtd-utils. I put the part of the mtd_speedtest result here for your information. >From the mtd_speedtest, we can see the NFC will reduce the %50 of cpu load when writing nand flash. No change when reading. In the meantime, the speed will be slow about %8. - commands use to test: #insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 & #top -n 30 -d 1 | grep speedtest - test result: Before the patch: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 515 495 root R 1164 0% 93% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 99% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock write speed is 5768 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 92% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 5932 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page write speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page write speed is 5770 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 89% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 5910 KiB/s After the patch: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock write speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 49% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 50% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 47% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock write speed is 5370 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 92% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 95% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 5715 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page write speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 48% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 47% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 50% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page write speed is 5224 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 89% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 93% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 5641 KiB/s Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2013-08-05 19:14:35 +08:00
static struct of_device_id atmel_nand_nfc_match[] = {
{ .compatible = "atmel,sama5d3-nfc" },
{ /* sentinel */ }
};
#endif
mtd: atmel_nand: add Nand Flash Controller (NFC) support Nand Flash Controller (NFC) can handle automatic transfers, sending the commands and address cycles to the NAND Flash. To use NFC in this driver, user needs to add NFC child node in nand flash driver. The NFC child node includes NFC's compatible string and regiters of the address and size of NFC command registers, NFC registers (embedded in HSMC) and NFC SRAM. Also user need to set up the HSMC irq, which use to check whether nfc command is finish or not. This driver has been tested on SAMA5D3X-EK board with JFFS2, YAFFS, UBIFS and mtd-utils. I put the part of the mtd_speedtest result here for your information. >From the mtd_speedtest, we can see the NFC will reduce the %50 of cpu load when writing nand flash. No change when reading. In the meantime, the speed will be slow about %8. - commands use to test: #insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 & #top -n 30 -d 1 | grep speedtest - test result: Before the patch: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 515 495 root R 1164 0% 93% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 99% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock write speed is 5768 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 92% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 5932 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page write speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 98% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page write speed is 5770 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 89% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 515 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 5910 KiB/s After the patch: ================================================= mtd_speedtest: MTD device: 2 mtd_speedtest: MTD device size 41943040, eraseblock size 131072, page size 2048, count of eraseblocks 320, pages per eraseblock 64, OOB size 64 mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock write speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 49% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 50% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 47% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock write speed is 5370 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing eraseblock read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 92% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 91% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 95% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: eraseblock read speed is 5715 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page write speed 509 495 root D 1164 0% 48% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 47% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root D 1164 0% 50% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page write speed is 5224 KiB/s mtd_speedtest: testing page read speed 509 495 root R 1164 0% 89% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 94% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 509 495 root R 1164 0% 93% insmod /mnt/mtd_speedtest.ko dev=2 mtd_speedtest: page read speed is 5641 KiB/s Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
2013-08-05 19:14:35 +08:00
static struct platform_driver atmel_nand_nfc_driver = {
.driver = {
.name = "atmel_nand_nfc",
.owner = THIS_MODULE,
.of_match_table = of_match_ptr(atmel_nand_nfc_match),
},
.probe = atmel_nand_nfc_probe,
};
static struct platform_driver atmel_nand_driver = {
.remove = __exit_p(atmel_nand_remove),
.driver = {
.name = "atmel_nand",
.owner = THIS_MODULE,
.of_match_table = of_match_ptr(atmel_nand_dt_ids),
},
};
module_platform_driver_probe(atmel_nand_driver, atmel_nand_probe);
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
MODULE_AUTHOR("Rick Bronson");
MODULE_DESCRIPTION("NAND/SmartMedia driver for AT91 / AVR32");
MODULE_ALIAS("platform:atmel_nand");