linux-sg2042/arch/parisc/kernel/time.c

274 lines
7.5 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/*
* linux/arch/parisc/kernel/time.c
*
* Copyright (C) 1991, 1992, 1995 Linus Torvalds
* Modifications for ARM (C) 1994, 1995, 1996,1997 Russell King
* Copyright (C) 1999 SuSE GmbH, (Philipp Rumpf, prumpf@tux.org)
*
* 1994-07-02 Alan Modra
* fixed set_rtc_mmss, fixed time.year for >= 2000, new mktime
* 1998-12-20 Updated NTP code according to technical memorandum Jan '96
* "A Kernel Model for Precision Timekeeping" by Dave Mills
*/
#include <linux/errno.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/sched.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/param.h>
#include <linux/string.h>
#include <linux/mm.h>
#include <linux/interrupt.h>
#include <linux/time.h>
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/smp.h>
#include <linux/profile.h>
#include <linux/clocksource.h>
#include <linux/platform_device.h>
#include <linux/ftrace.h>
#include <asm/uaccess.h>
#include <asm/io.h>
#include <asm/irq.h>
#include <asm/page.h>
#include <asm/param.h>
#include <asm/pdc.h>
#include <asm/led.h>
#include <linux/timex.h>
static unsigned long clocktick __read_mostly; /* timer cycles per tick */
/*
* We keep time on PA-RISC Linux by using the Interval Timer which is
* a pair of registers; one is read-only and one is write-only; both
* accessed through CR16. The read-only register is 32 or 64 bits wide,
* and increments by 1 every CPU clock tick. The architecture only
* guarantees us a rate between 0.5 and 2, but all implementations use a
* rate of 1. The write-only register is 32-bits wide. When the lowest
* 32 bits of the read-only register compare equal to the write-only
* register, it raises a maskable external interrupt. Each processor has
* an Interval Timer of its own and they are not synchronised.
*
* We want to generate an interrupt every 1/HZ seconds. So we program
* CR16 to interrupt every @clocktick cycles. The it_value in cpu_data
* is programmed with the intended time of the next tick. We can be
* held off for an arbitrarily long period of time by interrupts being
* disabled, so we may miss one or more ticks.
*/
irqreturn_t __irq_entry timer_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
{
parisc: fix "delay!" timer handling Rewrote timer_interrupt() to properly handle the "delayed!" case. If we used floating point math to compute the number of ticks that had elapsed since the last timer interrupt, it could take up to 12K cycles (emperical!) to handle the interrupt. Existing code assumed it would never take more than 8k cycles. We end up programming Interval Timer to a value less than "current" cycle counter. Thus have to wait until Interval Timer "wrapped" and would then get the "delayed!" printk that I moved below. Since we don't really know what the upper limit is, I prefer to read CR16 again after we've programmed it to make sure we won't have to wait for CR16 to wrap. Further, the printk was between reading CR16 (cycle couner) and writing CR16 (the interval timer). This would cause us to continue to set the interval timer to a value that was "behind" the cycle counter. Rinse and repeat. So no printk's between reading CR16 and setting next interval timer. Tested on A500 (550 Mhz PA8600). Signed-off-by: Grant Grundler <grundler@parisc-linux.org> Tested-by: Kyle McMartin <kyle@mcmartin.ca> Signed-off-by: Kyle McMartin <kyle@mcmartin.ca> ---- Kyle, Helge, and other parisc's, Please test on 32-bit before committing. I think I have it right but recognize I might not. TODO: I wanted to use "do_div()" in order to get both remainder and value back with one division op. That should help with the latency alot but can be applied seperately from this patch. thanks, grant
2009-06-01 08:20:23 +08:00
unsigned long now, now2;
unsigned long next_tick;
parisc: fix "delay!" timer handling Rewrote timer_interrupt() to properly handle the "delayed!" case. If we used floating point math to compute the number of ticks that had elapsed since the last timer interrupt, it could take up to 12K cycles (emperical!) to handle the interrupt. Existing code assumed it would never take more than 8k cycles. We end up programming Interval Timer to a value less than "current" cycle counter. Thus have to wait until Interval Timer "wrapped" and would then get the "delayed!" printk that I moved below. Since we don't really know what the upper limit is, I prefer to read CR16 again after we've programmed it to make sure we won't have to wait for CR16 to wrap. Further, the printk was between reading CR16 (cycle couner) and writing CR16 (the interval timer). This would cause us to continue to set the interval timer to a value that was "behind" the cycle counter. Rinse and repeat. So no printk's between reading CR16 and setting next interval timer. Tested on A500 (550 Mhz PA8600). Signed-off-by: Grant Grundler <grundler@parisc-linux.org> Tested-by: Kyle McMartin <kyle@mcmartin.ca> Signed-off-by: Kyle McMartin <kyle@mcmartin.ca> ---- Kyle, Helge, and other parisc's, Please test on 32-bit before committing. I think I have it right but recognize I might not. TODO: I wanted to use "do_div()" in order to get both remainder and value back with one division op. That should help with the latency alot but can be applied seperately from this patch. thanks, grant
2009-06-01 08:20:23 +08:00
unsigned long cycles_elapsed, ticks_elapsed = 1;
unsigned long cycles_remainder;
unsigned int cpu = smp_processor_id();
struct cpuinfo_parisc *cpuinfo = &per_cpu(cpu_data, cpu);
/* gcc can optimize for "read-only" case with a local clocktick */
unsigned long cpt = clocktick;
profile_tick(CPU_PROFILING);
/* Initialize next_tick to the expected tick time. */
next_tick = cpuinfo->it_value;
parisc: fix "delay!" timer handling Rewrote timer_interrupt() to properly handle the "delayed!" case. If we used floating point math to compute the number of ticks that had elapsed since the last timer interrupt, it could take up to 12K cycles (emperical!) to handle the interrupt. Existing code assumed it would never take more than 8k cycles. We end up programming Interval Timer to a value less than "current" cycle counter. Thus have to wait until Interval Timer "wrapped" and would then get the "delayed!" printk that I moved below. Since we don't really know what the upper limit is, I prefer to read CR16 again after we've programmed it to make sure we won't have to wait for CR16 to wrap. Further, the printk was between reading CR16 (cycle couner) and writing CR16 (the interval timer). This would cause us to continue to set the interval timer to a value that was "behind" the cycle counter. Rinse and repeat. So no printk's between reading CR16 and setting next interval timer. Tested on A500 (550 Mhz PA8600). Signed-off-by: Grant Grundler <grundler@parisc-linux.org> Tested-by: Kyle McMartin <kyle@mcmartin.ca> Signed-off-by: Kyle McMartin <kyle@mcmartin.ca> ---- Kyle, Helge, and other parisc's, Please test on 32-bit before committing. I think I have it right but recognize I might not. TODO: I wanted to use "do_div()" in order to get both remainder and value back with one division op. That should help with the latency alot but can be applied seperately from this patch. thanks, grant
2009-06-01 08:20:23 +08:00
/* Get current cycle counter (Control Register 16). */
now = mfctl(16);
cycles_elapsed = now - next_tick;
parisc: fix "delay!" timer handling Rewrote timer_interrupt() to properly handle the "delayed!" case. If we used floating point math to compute the number of ticks that had elapsed since the last timer interrupt, it could take up to 12K cycles (emperical!) to handle the interrupt. Existing code assumed it would never take more than 8k cycles. We end up programming Interval Timer to a value less than "current" cycle counter. Thus have to wait until Interval Timer "wrapped" and would then get the "delayed!" printk that I moved below. Since we don't really know what the upper limit is, I prefer to read CR16 again after we've programmed it to make sure we won't have to wait for CR16 to wrap. Further, the printk was between reading CR16 (cycle couner) and writing CR16 (the interval timer). This would cause us to continue to set the interval timer to a value that was "behind" the cycle counter. Rinse and repeat. So no printk's between reading CR16 and setting next interval timer. Tested on A500 (550 Mhz PA8600). Signed-off-by: Grant Grundler <grundler@parisc-linux.org> Tested-by: Kyle McMartin <kyle@mcmartin.ca> Signed-off-by: Kyle McMartin <kyle@mcmartin.ca> ---- Kyle, Helge, and other parisc's, Please test on 32-bit before committing. I think I have it right but recognize I might not. TODO: I wanted to use "do_div()" in order to get both remainder and value back with one division op. That should help with the latency alot but can be applied seperately from this patch. thanks, grant
2009-06-01 08:20:23 +08:00
if ((cycles_elapsed >> 6) < cpt) {
/* use "cheap" math (add/subtract) instead
* of the more expensive div/mul method
*/
cycles_remainder = cycles_elapsed;
while (cycles_remainder > cpt) {
cycles_remainder -= cpt;
ticks_elapsed++;
}
} else {
parisc: fix "delay!" timer handling Rewrote timer_interrupt() to properly handle the "delayed!" case. If we used floating point math to compute the number of ticks that had elapsed since the last timer interrupt, it could take up to 12K cycles (emperical!) to handle the interrupt. Existing code assumed it would never take more than 8k cycles. We end up programming Interval Timer to a value less than "current" cycle counter. Thus have to wait until Interval Timer "wrapped" and would then get the "delayed!" printk that I moved below. Since we don't really know what the upper limit is, I prefer to read CR16 again after we've programmed it to make sure we won't have to wait for CR16 to wrap. Further, the printk was between reading CR16 (cycle couner) and writing CR16 (the interval timer). This would cause us to continue to set the interval timer to a value that was "behind" the cycle counter. Rinse and repeat. So no printk's between reading CR16 and setting next interval timer. Tested on A500 (550 Mhz PA8600). Signed-off-by: Grant Grundler <grundler@parisc-linux.org> Tested-by: Kyle McMartin <kyle@mcmartin.ca> Signed-off-by: Kyle McMartin <kyle@mcmartin.ca> ---- Kyle, Helge, and other parisc's, Please test on 32-bit before committing. I think I have it right but recognize I might not. TODO: I wanted to use "do_div()" in order to get both remainder and value back with one division op. That should help with the latency alot but can be applied seperately from this patch. thanks, grant
2009-06-01 08:20:23 +08:00
/* TODO: Reduce this to one fdiv op */
cycles_remainder = cycles_elapsed % cpt;
parisc: fix "delay!" timer handling Rewrote timer_interrupt() to properly handle the "delayed!" case. If we used floating point math to compute the number of ticks that had elapsed since the last timer interrupt, it could take up to 12K cycles (emperical!) to handle the interrupt. Existing code assumed it would never take more than 8k cycles. We end up programming Interval Timer to a value less than "current" cycle counter. Thus have to wait until Interval Timer "wrapped" and would then get the "delayed!" printk that I moved below. Since we don't really know what the upper limit is, I prefer to read CR16 again after we've programmed it to make sure we won't have to wait for CR16 to wrap. Further, the printk was between reading CR16 (cycle couner) and writing CR16 (the interval timer). This would cause us to continue to set the interval timer to a value that was "behind" the cycle counter. Rinse and repeat. So no printk's between reading CR16 and setting next interval timer. Tested on A500 (550 Mhz PA8600). Signed-off-by: Grant Grundler <grundler@parisc-linux.org> Tested-by: Kyle McMartin <kyle@mcmartin.ca> Signed-off-by: Kyle McMartin <kyle@mcmartin.ca> ---- Kyle, Helge, and other parisc's, Please test on 32-bit before committing. I think I have it right but recognize I might not. TODO: I wanted to use "do_div()" in order to get both remainder and value back with one division op. That should help with the latency alot but can be applied seperately from this patch. thanks, grant
2009-06-01 08:20:23 +08:00
ticks_elapsed += cycles_elapsed / cpt;
}
/* convert from "division remainder" to "remainder of clock tick" */
cycles_remainder = cpt - cycles_remainder;
/* Determine when (in CR16 cycles) next IT interrupt will fire.
* We want IT to fire modulo clocktick even if we miss/skip some.
* But those interrupts don't in fact get delivered that regularly.
*/
next_tick = now + cycles_remainder;
cpuinfo->it_value = next_tick;
parisc: fix "delay!" timer handling Rewrote timer_interrupt() to properly handle the "delayed!" case. If we used floating point math to compute the number of ticks that had elapsed since the last timer interrupt, it could take up to 12K cycles (emperical!) to handle the interrupt. Existing code assumed it would never take more than 8k cycles. We end up programming Interval Timer to a value less than "current" cycle counter. Thus have to wait until Interval Timer "wrapped" and would then get the "delayed!" printk that I moved below. Since we don't really know what the upper limit is, I prefer to read CR16 again after we've programmed it to make sure we won't have to wait for CR16 to wrap. Further, the printk was between reading CR16 (cycle couner) and writing CR16 (the interval timer). This would cause us to continue to set the interval timer to a value that was "behind" the cycle counter. Rinse and repeat. So no printk's between reading CR16 and setting next interval timer. Tested on A500 (550 Mhz PA8600). Signed-off-by: Grant Grundler <grundler@parisc-linux.org> Tested-by: Kyle McMartin <kyle@mcmartin.ca> Signed-off-by: Kyle McMartin <kyle@mcmartin.ca> ---- Kyle, Helge, and other parisc's, Please test on 32-bit before committing. I think I have it right but recognize I might not. TODO: I wanted to use "do_div()" in order to get both remainder and value back with one division op. That should help with the latency alot but can be applied seperately from this patch. thanks, grant
2009-06-01 08:20:23 +08:00
/* Program the IT when to deliver the next interrupt.
* Only bottom 32-bits of next_tick are writable in CR16!
*/
mtctl(next_tick, 16);
parisc: fix "delay!" timer handling Rewrote timer_interrupt() to properly handle the "delayed!" case. If we used floating point math to compute the number of ticks that had elapsed since the last timer interrupt, it could take up to 12K cycles (emperical!) to handle the interrupt. Existing code assumed it would never take more than 8k cycles. We end up programming Interval Timer to a value less than "current" cycle counter. Thus have to wait until Interval Timer "wrapped" and would then get the "delayed!" printk that I moved below. Since we don't really know what the upper limit is, I prefer to read CR16 again after we've programmed it to make sure we won't have to wait for CR16 to wrap. Further, the printk was between reading CR16 (cycle couner) and writing CR16 (the interval timer). This would cause us to continue to set the interval timer to a value that was "behind" the cycle counter. Rinse and repeat. So no printk's between reading CR16 and setting next interval timer. Tested on A500 (550 Mhz PA8600). Signed-off-by: Grant Grundler <grundler@parisc-linux.org> Tested-by: Kyle McMartin <kyle@mcmartin.ca> Signed-off-by: Kyle McMartin <kyle@mcmartin.ca> ---- Kyle, Helge, and other parisc's, Please test on 32-bit before committing. I think I have it right but recognize I might not. TODO: I wanted to use "do_div()" in order to get both remainder and value back with one division op. That should help with the latency alot but can be applied seperately from this patch. thanks, grant
2009-06-01 08:20:23 +08:00
/* Skip one clocktick on purpose if we missed next_tick.
* The new CR16 must be "later" than current CR16 otherwise
* itimer would not fire until CR16 wrapped - e.g 4 seconds
* later on a 1Ghz processor. We'll account for the missed
* tick on the next timer interrupt.
*
* "next_tick - now" will always give the difference regardless
* if one or the other wrapped. If "now" is "bigger" we'll end up
* with a very large unsigned number.
*/
now2 = mfctl(16);
if (next_tick - now2 > cpt)
mtctl(next_tick+cpt, 16);
#if 1
/*
* GGG: DEBUG code for how many cycles programming CR16 used.
*/
if (unlikely(now2 - now > 0x3000)) /* 12K cycles */
printk (KERN_CRIT "timer_interrupt(CPU %d): SLOW! 0x%lx cycles!"
" cyc %lX rem %lX "
" next/now %lX/%lX\n",
cpu, now2 - now, cycles_elapsed, cycles_remainder,
next_tick, now );
#endif
/* Can we differentiate between "early CR16" (aka Scenario 1) and
* "long delay" (aka Scenario 3)? I don't think so.
*
* Timer_interrupt will be delivered at least a few hundred cycles
* after the IT fires. But it's arbitrary how much time passes
* before we call it "late". I've picked one second.
*
* It's important NO printk's are between reading CR16 and
* setting up the next value. May introduce huge variance.
*/
if (unlikely(ticks_elapsed > HZ)) {
/* Scenario 3: very long delay? bad in any case */
printk (KERN_CRIT "timer_interrupt(CPU %d): delayed!"
" cycles %lX rem %lX "
" next/now %lX/%lX\n",
cpu,
cycles_elapsed, cycles_remainder,
next_tick, now );
}
/* Done mucking with unreliable delivery of interrupts.
* Go do system house keeping.
*/
if (!--cpuinfo->prof_counter) {
cpuinfo->prof_counter = cpuinfo->prof_multiplier;
update_process_times(user_mode(get_irq_regs()));
}
if (cpu == 0)
xtime_update(ticks_elapsed);
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
unsigned long profile_pc(struct pt_regs *regs)
{
unsigned long pc = instruction_pointer(regs);
if (regs->gr[0] & PSW_N)
pc -= 4;
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
if (in_lock_functions(pc))
pc = regs->gr[2];
#endif
return pc;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(profile_pc);
/* clock source code */
static cycle_t read_cr16(struct clocksource *cs)
{
return get_cycles();
}
static struct clocksource clocksource_cr16 = {
.name = "cr16",
.rating = 300,
.read = read_cr16,
.mask = CLOCKSOURCE_MASK(BITS_PER_LONG),
.flags = CLOCK_SOURCE_IS_CONTINUOUS,
};
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
int update_cr16_clocksource(void)
{
/* since the cr16 cycle counters are not synchronized across CPUs,
we'll check if we should switch to a safe clocksource: */
if (clocksource_cr16.rating != 0 && num_online_cpus() > 1) {
clocksource_change_rating(&clocksource_cr16, 0);
return 1;
}
return 0;
}
#else
int update_cr16_clocksource(void)
{
return 0; /* no change */
}
#endif /*CONFIG_SMP*/
void __init start_cpu_itimer(void)
{
unsigned int cpu = smp_processor_id();
unsigned long next_tick = mfctl(16) + clocktick;
mtctl(next_tick, 16); /* kick off Interval Timer (CR16) */
per_cpu(cpu_data, cpu).it_value = next_tick;
}
static struct platform_device rtc_generic_dev = {
.name = "rtc-generic",
.id = -1,
};
static int __init rtc_init(void)
{
if (platform_device_register(&rtc_generic_dev) < 0)
printk(KERN_ERR "unable to register rtc device...\n");
/* not necessarily an error */
return 0;
}
module_init(rtc_init);
void read_persistent_clock(struct timespec *ts)
{
static struct pdc_tod tod_data;
if (pdc_tod_read(&tod_data) == 0) {
ts->tv_sec = tod_data.tod_sec;
ts->tv_nsec = tod_data.tod_usec * 1000;
} else {
printk(KERN_ERR "Error reading tod clock\n");
ts->tv_sec = 0;
ts->tv_nsec = 0;
}
}
void __init time_init(void)
{
unsigned long current_cr16_khz;
clocktick = (100 * PAGE0->mem_10msec) / HZ;
start_cpu_itimer(); /* get CPU 0 started */
/* register at clocksource framework */
current_cr16_khz = PAGE0->mem_10msec/10; /* kHz */
clocksource_register_khz(&clocksource_cr16, current_cr16_khz);
}