2012-03-29 01:30:02 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Copyright IBM Corp. 1999, 2009
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Author(s): Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#ifndef __ASM_FACILITY_H
|
|
|
|
#define __ASM_FACILITY_H
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/string.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/preempt.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <asm/lowcore.h>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#define MAX_FACILITY_BIT (256*8) /* stfle_fac_list has 256 bytes */
|
|
|
|
|
2013-06-20 21:11:39 +08:00
|
|
|
static inline int __test_facility(unsigned long nr, void *facilities)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
unsigned char *ptr;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (nr >= MAX_FACILITY_BIT)
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
ptr = (unsigned char *) facilities + (nr >> 3);
|
|
|
|
return (*ptr & (0x80 >> (nr & 7))) != 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2012-03-29 01:30:02 +08:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* The test_facility function uses the bit odering where the MSB is bit 0.
|
|
|
|
* That makes it easier to query facility bits with the bit number as
|
|
|
|
* documented in the Principles of Operation.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
static inline int test_facility(unsigned long nr)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2013-06-20 21:11:39 +08:00
|
|
|
return __test_facility(nr, &S390_lowcore.stfle_fac_list);
|
2012-03-29 01:30:02 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* stfle - Store facility list extended
|
|
|
|
* @stfle_fac_list: array where facility list can be stored
|
|
|
|
* @size: size of passed in array in double words
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
static inline void stfle(u64 *stfle_fac_list, int size)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
unsigned long nr;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
preempt_disable();
|
|
|
|
asm volatile(
|
|
|
|
" .insn s,0xb2b10000,0(0)\n" /* stfl */
|
|
|
|
"0:\n"
|
|
|
|
EX_TABLE(0b, 0b)
|
[S390] Fix stfle() lowcore protection problem
The stfle() function writes into lowcore memory when stfl_fac_list
is initialized with "S390_lowcore.stfl_fac_list = 0". For older
compilers this triggers a lowcore exception. With newer compilers
and "-OXX" compile option the bug does not show up because
the "S390_lowcore.stfl_fac_list" initialization is removed by the
compiler. The reason for thatis the incorrect "=m"
(S390_lowcore.stfl_fac_list) constraint in the stfl inline assembly.
The following shows the disassembly of the stfle() optimized code
that is inlined in the lgr_info_get() function:
000000000011325c <lgr_info_get>:
11325c: eb 9f f0 60 00 24 stmg %r9,%r15,96(%r15)
113262: c0 d0 00 29 0e 47 larl %r13,634ef0 <servi..>
113268: a7 f1 3f c0 tml %r15,16320
11326c: b9 04 00 ef lgr %r14,%r15
113270: a7 84 00 01 je 113272 <lgr_info_g..>
113274: a7 fb ff c0 aghi %r15,-64
113278: b9 04 00 c2 lgr %r12,%r2
11327c: a7 29 00 01 lghi %r2,1
113280: e3 e0 f0 98 00 24 stg %r14,152(%r15)
113286: d7 97 c0 00 c0 00 xc 0(152,%r12),0(%r12)
11328c: c0 e5 00 28 db 4c brasl %r14,62e924 <add_e..>
113292: b2 b1 00 00 stfl 0
To fix the problem we now clear the S390_lowcore.stfl_fac_list at
startup in "head.S" for all machine types before lowcore protection
is enabled.
In addition to that the "=m" constraint is replaced by "+m".
Signed-off-by: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
2012-04-11 20:28:11 +08:00
|
|
|
: "+m" (S390_lowcore.stfl_fac_list));
|
2012-03-29 01:30:02 +08:00
|
|
|
nr = 4; /* bytes stored by stfl */
|
|
|
|
memcpy(stfle_fac_list, &S390_lowcore.stfl_fac_list, 4);
|
|
|
|
if (S390_lowcore.stfl_fac_list & 0x01000000) {
|
|
|
|
/* More facility bits available with stfle */
|
|
|
|
register unsigned long reg0 asm("0") = size - 1;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
asm volatile(".insn s,0xb2b00000,0(%1)" /* stfle */
|
|
|
|
: "+d" (reg0)
|
|
|
|
: "a" (stfle_fac_list)
|
|
|
|
: "memory", "cc");
|
|
|
|
nr = (reg0 + 1) * 8; /* # bytes stored by stfle */
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
memset((char *) stfle_fac_list + nr, 0, size * 8 - nr);
|
|
|
|
preempt_enable();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#endif /* __ASM_FACILITY_H */
|